If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
BULL PUCKEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In article , Petros writes: Francis A. Miniter posted: You are not using a 35 mm camera, are you? If you are THE wedding photographer, 35 mm is not the right forma |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
If he is reacting to the sound of the sutter and THEN is closing his eyes they
you will be ok. figure the time for the sound to travel from the cam, and his reaction time his eyes will be open. In article , Petros writes: My question has to do with a wedding that I'll be shooting for a friend of mine next weekend. I did some test shots with the couple today, and found out that the groom has a reaction to the shutter that makes him close his eyes when he hears it, even if the flash is turned off. Does anybody have any advice for what I can do to minimalize his reaction? I'd hate for all the shots of the "happy couple" to be with his eyes closed. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
If he is reacting to the sound of the sutter and THEN is closing his eyes they
you will be ok. figure the time for the sound to travel from the cam, and his reaction time his eyes will be open. In article , Petros writes: My question has to do with a wedding that I'll be shooting for a friend of mine next weekend. I did some test shots with the couple today, and found out that the groom has a reaction to the shutter that makes him close his eyes when he hears it, even if the flash is turned off. Does anybody have any advice for what I can do to minimalize his reaction? I'd hate for all the shots of the "happy couple" to be with his eyes closed. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
Petros wrote:
Well... I'll be using two cameras. One is a duck Sigma SD9 Ouch! Digital. I'm wounded. and the other is a duck again 35mm slr. Favor the 35 mm slr. See if you can rent or borrow a second body for the day. The Sigma is mine, the 35mm belongs to the bride. I'm not doing this for money, but as a favor to the bride. As for medium format, the costs are too high here in Poland for such luxuries Too late for the wedding but you might look into a Russian Lubitel. A low cost and basic TLR. There is also the Chinese made Seagull. I don't do photography professionally, rather as a hobby, and the bride just happens to like my work. I do thank you for your advice, since this is one job I'd rather not screw up. Petros Francis A. Miniter |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
Petros wrote:
Well... I'll be using two cameras. One is a duck Sigma SD9 Ouch! Digital. I'm wounded. and the other is a duck again 35mm slr. Favor the 35 mm slr. See if you can rent or borrow a second body for the day. The Sigma is mine, the 35mm belongs to the bride. I'm not doing this for money, but as a favor to the bride. As for medium format, the costs are too high here in Poland for such luxuries Too late for the wedding but you might look into a Russian Lubitel. A low cost and basic TLR. There is also the Chinese made Seagull. I don't do photography professionally, rather as a hobby, and the bride just happens to like my work. I do thank you for your advice, since this is one job I'd rather not screw up. Petros Francis A. Miniter |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
This is my first time here, and I'm printing out articles like crazy, because there is a lot of helpful advice to be had. Thanks! My question has to do with a wedding that I'll be shooting for a friend of mine next weekend. I did some test shots with the couple today, and found out that the groom has a reaction to the shutter that makes him close his eyes when he hears it, even if the flash is turned off. Does anybody have any advice for what I can do to minimalize his reaction? I'd hate for all the shots of the "happy couple" to be with his eyes closed. Not likely to be from the sound of the shutter, probably he sees your finger tense on the shutter. One remedy would be to use a long cable release and hold your hand behind your back. A lot of pros use a flash bracket with a handle on the side and a pistol grip with a shutter release, with all the cables and stuff on the bracket handle, as well as the tilt of it, you can hide or obscure the trigger finger's flex. How often does he do this? half or more of the exposures? I've run across this problem several times, usually with (possibly) abused kids and some women (again possibly abused as kids) Never a guy. Frankly it sounds like latent assholism. You know, a weasel control freak. Use a tripod, you can stand and look at the couple's eyes when you shoot and see the reflection of the flash in their eyes, the catch lights. You can see if this guy is a jerk or just has a psychological problem. If its the former you can bash the guy upside the head with the tripod and then tell the bride (I'll bet she's the one you're friends with) not to marry this creep, she won't listen, they still won't be a happy couple but at least you won't spend the rest of your life knowing you saw your friend walk in front of a moving train without saying anything. If its the latter, then work with the guy, wait for a blink and then shoot, blinks are fast if you see one and shoot your finger will be slower than the blink, though some people do have a double blink (I think they are the aliens among us but that's another post.) If that doesn't work then tell the guy what the problem is and ask his help. Just look at me and don't blink, hey, that worked. Oh, direct flash can be painful for some people, use a tripod and bounce your flash off a side wall, use as wide a lens opening as you can, cause bounces wastes a lot of the light. to salvage what you can, have the guy look at her, shoot a close up, say her looking at her ring, he's looking right at her, nose bumping her cheek or ear, even if the guy is trying to be a jerk, he will still look romantic or at least his wife will think so. (that works with crosseyed subjects too.) There is an example of this posted in the photos section of the z-prophoto mailing list at yahoogroups.com Also, since you are shooting some digital, you could find the one shot with his eyes open and head swap with the other groups. again another reason to shoot with a tripod, you can cut and paste from one image to the next without doing much if any work to line up with the background. When I shoot I usually set the bride up, fluff her dress and leave her there, the groom gets posed next to her, and for most of the shots he can stay in that one spot too, bring in the parents, add the brothers and sisters, grandparents, the wedding party, his folks, now the office workers, old friends. blink blink blink, swap swap swap. with most photo editing programs you can draw a circle around the head, feather the selection, cut and drag it righ on to the closed eye shot. He'll have the same dopey expression in 9 of ten shots but you will have beaten him at his game, or helped him with his embarrassing medical or mental problem. If you hand hold you can find a lot of changes between shots that make it difficult to cut and paste from one to the other. so find one spot, one pose, don't zoom, if you have to crop then do so, or just leave some space, you can have one zoom or camera position for couples and another for the groups. then you'll need two shots without blinks. if he also kills shots by hidding smiles, either by turning his head (oh no wait) or quickly deciding his hair is out of place and running his hands up in front of his face, or frequently looking at the floor or anywhere than where a normal person then you know you have a guy with a serious personality disorder. If you think you have this problem already from the test shots then walk away. Tell the bride you can't, heck, buy the bride a wedding gift and hire someone to shoot the formals. (any photogs you don't really like?) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
This is my first time here, and I'm printing out articles like crazy, because there is a lot of helpful advice to be had. Thanks! My question has to do with a wedding that I'll be shooting for a friend of mine next weekend. I did some test shots with the couple today, and found out that the groom has a reaction to the shutter that makes him close his eyes when he hears it, even if the flash is turned off. Does anybody have any advice for what I can do to minimalize his reaction? I'd hate for all the shots of the "happy couple" to be with his eyes closed. Not likely to be from the sound of the shutter, probably he sees your finger tense on the shutter. One remedy would be to use a long cable release and hold your hand behind your back. A lot of pros use a flash bracket with a handle on the side and a pistol grip with a shutter release, with all the cables and stuff on the bracket handle, as well as the tilt of it, you can hide or obscure the trigger finger's flex. How often does he do this? half or more of the exposures? I've run across this problem several times, usually with (possibly) abused kids and some women (again possibly abused as kids) Never a guy. Frankly it sounds like latent assholism. You know, a weasel control freak. Use a tripod, you can stand and look at the couple's eyes when you shoot and see the reflection of the flash in their eyes, the catch lights. You can see if this guy is a jerk or just has a psychological problem. If its the former you can bash the guy upside the head with the tripod and then tell the bride (I'll bet she's the one you're friends with) not to marry this creep, she won't listen, they still won't be a happy couple but at least you won't spend the rest of your life knowing you saw your friend walk in front of a moving train without saying anything. If its the latter, then work with the guy, wait for a blink and then shoot, blinks are fast if you see one and shoot your finger will be slower than the blink, though some people do have a double blink (I think they are the aliens among us but that's another post.) If that doesn't work then tell the guy what the problem is and ask his help. Just look at me and don't blink, hey, that worked. Oh, direct flash can be painful for some people, use a tripod and bounce your flash off a side wall, use as wide a lens opening as you can, cause bounces wastes a lot of the light. to salvage what you can, have the guy look at her, shoot a close up, say her looking at her ring, he's looking right at her, nose bumping her cheek or ear, even if the guy is trying to be a jerk, he will still look romantic or at least his wife will think so. (that works with crosseyed subjects too.) There is an example of this posted in the photos section of the z-prophoto mailing list at yahoogroups.com Also, since you are shooting some digital, you could find the one shot with his eyes open and head swap with the other groups. again another reason to shoot with a tripod, you can cut and paste from one image to the next without doing much if any work to line up with the background. When I shoot I usually set the bride up, fluff her dress and leave her there, the groom gets posed next to her, and for most of the shots he can stay in that one spot too, bring in the parents, add the brothers and sisters, grandparents, the wedding party, his folks, now the office workers, old friends. blink blink blink, swap swap swap. with most photo editing programs you can draw a circle around the head, feather the selection, cut and drag it righ on to the closed eye shot. He'll have the same dopey expression in 9 of ten shots but you will have beaten him at his game, or helped him with his embarrassing medical or mental problem. If you hand hold you can find a lot of changes between shots that make it difficult to cut and paste from one to the other. so find one spot, one pose, don't zoom, if you have to crop then do so, or just leave some space, you can have one zoom or camera position for couples and another for the groups. then you'll need two shots without blinks. if he also kills shots by hidding smiles, either by turning his head (oh no wait) or quickly deciding his hair is out of place and running his hands up in front of his face, or frequently looking at the floor or anywhere than where a normal person then you know you have a guy with a serious personality disorder. If you think you have this problem already from the test shots then walk away. Tell the bride you can't, heck, buy the bride a wedding gift and hire someone to shoot the formals. (any photogs you don't really like?) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 23:55:21 +0200, Petros
wrote: Hi all! This is my first time here, and I'm printing out articles like crazy, because there is a lot of helpful advice to be had. Thanks! My question has to do with a wedding that I'll be shooting for a friend of mine next weekend. I did some test shots with the couple today, and found out that the groom has a reaction to the shutter that makes him close his eyes when he hears it, even if the flash is turned off. Does anybody have any advice for what I can do to minimalize his reaction? I'd hate for all the shots of the "happy couple" to be with his eyes closed. Thanks. aug204 from Lloyd Erlick, Concentrate on him for a short while, getting in close and tripping the shutter many times. Best of all would be to do this during a practice run. Perhaps do it at the very beginning of the session. And of course do not use the flash. His blink response will probably decondition quite rapidly. (It's a first-year-psychology conditioned response to the shutter sound. He's lucky not to have been one of Pavlov's dogs, because the surgery they had was not very nice.) As others have suggested, work with a quiet camera. The conditioned response occurs in response to the conditioning stimulus, in this case the sound of the camera. So if you get him used to the fact that the sound does not imply a flash in his eyes, plus if you use a quiet camera or make sure environmental noise and/or distance cover the noise for him, both his conditioning and the strength of the undesired stimulus will be reduced. I sometimes find that little kids squint and respond to the expectation of flash as soon as they see a camera -- or me. No sound stimulus required. Here's something that helps a lot, even with adults (definitely try it out on your groom...) -- after a few frames and plenty of friendly banter, invite a few folks to look through your camera. The kids especially love this, but adults respond, too. While they look at their family through the viewfinder (set it up carefully first), declaim to one and all about how beautiful things look through a camera viewfinder, and how much you love to look at the view it provides. **Let the kids trip the shutter once or twice each.** (Cable or electric remote release is essential for many reasons.) After this treatment, no child will squint at you! (Of course, the flash must be shut off for this to work...). I've long since abandoned flash altogether. To have anything but outright ugly light from flash, one's skill level must be very high. Examine the work of Shelby Lee Adams for an education in proper use of flash. Even before I saw his work, I knew my skill with flash was not high enough. But for me the pain on peoples' faces as soon as they see me is more than enough to convince me to never burden my body with a flash unit again. If other photogs have conditioned your subjects to squint, you can probably decondition them with some effort. But if you are planning to use flash, they will only be mentally sitting in the dentist's chair, outwardly calm, inwardly awaiting the drill. I like to explain I never use flash, so I need their cooperation by sitting calmly and being relaxed -- looking like themselves. Then I joke about my collection of antique dentist's drills... regards, --le ________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. voice: 416-686-0326 email: net: www.heylloyd.com ________________________________ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 23:55:21 +0200, Petros
wrote: Hi all! This is my first time here, and I'm printing out articles like crazy, because there is a lot of helpful advice to be had. Thanks! My question has to do with a wedding that I'll be shooting for a friend of mine next weekend. I did some test shots with the couple today, and found out that the groom has a reaction to the shutter that makes him close his eyes when he hears it, even if the flash is turned off. Does anybody have any advice for what I can do to minimalize his reaction? I'd hate for all the shots of the "happy couple" to be with his eyes closed. Thanks. aug204 from Lloyd Erlick, Concentrate on him for a short while, getting in close and tripping the shutter many times. Best of all would be to do this during a practice run. Perhaps do it at the very beginning of the session. And of course do not use the flash. His blink response will probably decondition quite rapidly. (It's a first-year-psychology conditioned response to the shutter sound. He's lucky not to have been one of Pavlov's dogs, because the surgery they had was not very nice.) As others have suggested, work with a quiet camera. The conditioned response occurs in response to the conditioning stimulus, in this case the sound of the camera. So if you get him used to the fact that the sound does not imply a flash in his eyes, plus if you use a quiet camera or make sure environmental noise and/or distance cover the noise for him, both his conditioning and the strength of the undesired stimulus will be reduced. I sometimes find that little kids squint and respond to the expectation of flash as soon as they see a camera -- or me. No sound stimulus required. Here's something that helps a lot, even with adults (definitely try it out on your groom...) -- after a few frames and plenty of friendly banter, invite a few folks to look through your camera. The kids especially love this, but adults respond, too. While they look at their family through the viewfinder (set it up carefully first), declaim to one and all about how beautiful things look through a camera viewfinder, and how much you love to look at the view it provides. **Let the kids trip the shutter once or twice each.** (Cable or electric remote release is essential for many reasons.) After this treatment, no child will squint at you! (Of course, the flash must be shut off for this to work...). I've long since abandoned flash altogether. To have anything but outright ugly light from flash, one's skill level must be very high. Examine the work of Shelby Lee Adams for an education in proper use of flash. Even before I saw his work, I knew my skill with flash was not high enough. But for me the pain on peoples' faces as soon as they see me is more than enough to convince me to never burden my body with a flash unit again. If other photogs have conditioned your subjects to squint, you can probably decondition them with some effort. But if you are planning to use flash, they will only be mentally sitting in the dentist's chair, outwardly calm, inwardly awaiting the drill. I like to explain I never use flash, so I need their cooperation by sitting calmly and being relaxed -- looking like themselves. Then I joke about my collection of antique dentist's drills... regards, --le ________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. voice: 416-686-0326 email: net: www.heylloyd.com ________________________________ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Difficult subject
Francis A. Miniter posted:
Petros wrote: Well... I'll be using two cameras. One is a duck Sigma SD9 Ouch! Digital. I'm wounded. Don't take it personally, I also used to paint with oils and watercolor, and built most of my furniture out of hardwood, but I live in a different reality now and the other is a duck again 35mm slr. Favor the 35 mm slr. See if you can rent or borrow a second body for the day. The Sigma is mine, the 35mm belongs to the bride. I'm not doing this for money, but as a favor to the bride. As for medium format, the costs are too high here in Poland for such luxuries Too late for the wedding but you might look into a Russian Lubitel. A low cost and basic TLR. There is also the Chinese made Seagull. I actually have an old rolliflex, which just needs some cleaning, but it's the film that costs too much here. 108 frames for $6 (bride's choice) vs. 12 frames for $10, plus waiting two weeks to get it developed... For most of the graphic work that I do, the digital is the best option, as it saves me many hours of scanning and transfer and money spent on developing film and driving back and forth to the photo store. No turning back now! -- Petros Ap' ola prin ipirche o Logos |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I don't know how to phrase the subject line... .. | Mike Henley | 35mm Photo Equipment | 9 | April 15th 06 05:41 AM |
Is selling photos difficult? | Mike Henley | 35mm Photo Equipment | 10 | July 1st 04 08:51 PM |
How to determine distance from KEY light to subject | Phil Lamerton | Photographing People | 12 | April 27th 04 05:49 PM |
Same subject at different apertures | Bunyip | General Photography Techniques | 10 | March 17th 04 05:00 PM |
got rid of shadows on portraits, but now subject too dark - help? | Lynn | Photographing People | 7 | October 15th 03 10:44 PM |