all-in-one-PC responses spread over what looks like 20 posts??!

On 2016-01-31 22:07:39 +0000, RichA said:

Something went wrong.

20 posts? After android contaminated the OP with his unwanted X-post to
we are up to 1148 so far! There are probably more to come.

Here is a little taste of the thread tree. It is so long I couldn't fit
it into a single screen capture.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_469.jpg

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2016-01-31 22:35:13 +0000, Savageduck said:

On 2016-01-31 22:07:39 +0000, RichA said:

Something went wrong.

20 posts? After android contaminated the OP with his unwanted X-post to
we are up to 1148 so far! There are probably more to come.

Here is a little taste of the thread tree. It is so long I couldn't fit
it into a single screen capture.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_469.jpg

BTW: So far 755 of the posts are in the X-posted batch.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

Savageduck wrote:

20 posts? After android contaminated the OP with his unwanted X-post to
we are up to 1148 so far! There are probably more to come.

And for what is essentially a resurrection of the OS wars. That so much
of a group's traffic should consist of this noise is yet another sad
indicator of Usenet's decline.

On 2016-01-31 18:32, Savageduck wrote:

BTW: So far 755 of the posts are in the X-posted batch.

Due to the android asshole.

--
"But I am somehow extraordinarily lucky, for a guy with ****ty luck."
..Harrison Ford, Rolling Stone - 2015-12-02

On 2016-01-31 23:56:16 +0000, Alan Browne
said:

On 2016-01-31 18:32, Savageduck wrote:

BTW: So far 755 of the posts are in the X-posted batch.

Due to the android asshole.

Yup! However, all the usual suspects in both NG's have played their
part in building the total in both r.p.d & c.s.m.s. It is also
noticeable that android has kept his further participation to a minimum.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2016-01-31 19:11, Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-01-31 23:56:16 +0000, Alan Browne
said:

On 2016-01-31 18:32, Savageduck wrote:

BTW: So far 755 of the posts are in the X-posted batch.

Due to the android asshole.

Yup! However, all the usual suspects in both NG's have played their part
in building the total in both r.p.d & c.s.m.s. It is also noticeable
that android has kept his further participation to a minimum.

Really minimum here since I've KF'd the little ****.

--
"But I am somehow extraordinarily lucky, for a guy with ****ty luck."
..Harrison Ford, Rolling Stone - 2015-12-02

On 2016-01-31 19:33, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 19:16:13 -0500, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2016-01-31 19:11, Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-01-31 23:56:16 +0000, Alan Browne
said:

On 2016-01-31 18:32, Savageduck wrote:

BTW: So far 755 of the posts are in the X-posted batch.

Due to the android asshole.

Yup! However, all the usual suspects in both NG's have played their part
in building the total in both r.p.d & c.s.m.s. It is also noticeable
that android has kept his further participation to a minimum.

Really minimum here since I've KF'd the little ****.

I see no problem with Android, but that Jolly Roger fellow seems to
have had his mind keelhauled. Thick as the plank he should walk.

JR is very knowledgeably and helpful with Mac issues. He leans into the
wind of Mac criticism a little strongly too.


--
"But I am somehow extraordinarily lucky, for a guy with ****ty luck."
..Harrison Ford, Rolling Stone - 2015-12-02

On 1/31/2016 6:45 PM, Neill Massello wrote:
Savageduck wrote:

20 posts? After android contaminated the OP with his unwanted X-post to
we are up to 1148 so far! There are probably more to come.

And for what is essentially a resurrection of the OS wars. That so much
of a group's traffic should consist of this noise is yet another sad
indicator of Usenet's decline.

It's no better on any unmoderated forum. So, I think that the
participants are the cause of such noise.

--
Best regards,

Neil