If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"
Supposedly hijackers turned off transponders making them invisible to
ATC. There is more to the story. Some theories are a bit in left field but look at OKC bombing- federal agents conveniently stayed home. On Sep 13, 3:14 pm, wrote: In misc.survivalism wrote: Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press, witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11: "That was no American Airlines jet" If what you suspect is true, then where did the AA planes end up? Are the passengers being kept in prisons? Were the planes dismantled in secret hangars? What happened to the guys in airport towers who were monitoring all the flights? How were they silenced when the AA planes were diverted to secret landing sites? Without these answers, I have trouble believing that the planes were not the AA planes. I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing that it was being done, but that can wait for another day. First I'd like to know what happened to the commercial jetliners and their passengers, and how the air traffic controllers were silenced. -- The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts. -- Bertrand Russel |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"
On Sep 13, 5:05 pm, wrote:
Supposedly hijackers turned off transponders making them invisible to ATC. There is more to the story. Yes, there is more to the story if you cared to check facts BEFORE trying to start more nonsense based on misinformation. Yes, the hijackers turned off the transponders. But no, that doesn't make the aircraft invisible to ATC radar. The transponder only provides a better radar return signal and info from the plane on it's altitude, airspeed, heading, etc. ATC still had radar images of the planes. They've even been shown occasionally on TV. A 757 is no more invisible to radar than a B-52. Wasn't that the whole point of the billions spent on new stealth military aircraft? Some theories are a bit in left field but look at OKC bombing- federal agents conveniently stayed home. Claiming that military aircraft brought down the WTC is just a bit in left field? And now, when you obviously don't know what the hell you;re talking about regarding aircraft and 911, we're supposed to believe your info that federal agents stayed home on the day of the OKC bombing? Where did you get that? From the same kooks that claim all the jews were told to stay home on 911? This crap is wreckless, irresponsible and only gives more aid to the terrorists who are trying to kill us all. On Sep 13, 3:14 pm, wrote: In misc.survivalism wrote: Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press, witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11: "That was no American Airlines jet" If what you suspect is true, then where did the AA planes end up? Are the passengers being kept in prisons? Were the planes dismantled in secret hangars? What happened to the guys in airport towers who were monitoring all the flights? How were they silenced when the AA planes were diverted to secret landing sites? Without these answers, I have trouble believing that the planes were not the AA planes. I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing that it was being done, but that can wait for another day. First I'd like to know what happened to the commercial jetliners and their passengers, and how the air traffic controllers were silenced. -- The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts. -- Bertrand Russel- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"
wrote in
ups.com: Supposedly hijackers turned off transponders making them invisible to ATC. There is more to the story. Some theories are a bit in left field but look at OKC bombing- federal agents conveniently stayed home. Are you a ****ing moron? Or do the 8 dead federal agents not count as "federal agents"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh "Although 168 people, including 19 children, were killed in the April 19, 1995, explosion, but murder charges were only brought against McVeigh for the eight federal agents who were on duty when the 5,000-pound fuel oil and fertilizer bomb ripped away the face of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building." |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"
RBrickston wrote:
Exactly, how do you hide the Attorney General's wife Barbara Olson? Slight correction: Barbara Olson was the wife of Ted Olson, then Solicitor General of the United States. Ted may, however, be the NEXT Attorney General. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"
Paul Heslop wrote:
wrote: Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press, witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11: "That was no American Airlines jet" "It was a military plane" "It was definitely no airliner" sod off you nutter Wahahaha........You sure are one stupid one. This is all you have? 12 Arabs that never flew a jumbo jet learned from a video game and this is what you think is the "truth". Wahhahaha.....What a loon........... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"
In misc.survivalism Jonathan wrote:
I can't get past the "controlled demolition" explanation. I've worked in a bunch of skyscrapers. Workmen are always questioned. And planting explosives secretly amongst tens of thousands of bored busybodies seems like a difficult task to me. That work is done by specialty firms. Lots and lots of manhours would be needed for two giant buildigs. It seems unlikely to me that the work could have been carried out in secret. Gee I saw no strange looking guys hiding anything under their coats. Man you are one NutJob. There are plenty of ways to place charges anywhere they wanted. Has anyone come up with a credible scenario? I'd love to see it. You sure are one simple minded soul aren't you? Do you think people would carry their tools in broad daylight while all the workers are on the job? When maintenance workers enter does do they ever do it while everyone is at work? No they don't fool. Does anyone even see the plumber or electrician while they are doing their job? I've often seen electricians in office buildings. They string new cables whenever offices are moved around. Ethernet, electical and telephone cable spools all over, with guys on ladders poking their heads above the drop ceiling. It is pretty common. But why do you ask? Is there a point you are heading towards? -- The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts. -- Bertrand Russel |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"
wrote in message ups.com... Supposedly hijackers turned off transponders making them invisible to ATC. There is more to the story. Some theories are a bit in left field but look at OKC bombing- federal agents conveniently stayed home. No, they didn't. Really. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"
Jonathan wrote:
Paul Heslop wrote: wrote: Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press, witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11: "That was no American Airlines jet" "It was a military plane" "It was definitely no airliner" sod off you nutter Wahahaha........You sure are one stupid one. This is all you have? 12 Arabs that never flew a jumbo jet learned from a video game and this is what you think is the "truth". Wahhahaha.....What a loon........... Do you use your right hand or your left hand for that Jonathan? -- Paul (We won't die of devotion) ------------------------------------------------------- Stop and Look http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"
On Sep 13, 8:14 pm, wrote:
I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing that it was being done, but that can wait for another day. http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/3...tshaftsut3.jpg Mechanical Engineer explains how demolitions charges were place on the welded joints on the WTC beams that ran up the center of the towers. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...66025292753615 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video-equivalent of "pitch-shifting." | Radium[_2_] | Digital Photography | 48 | August 28th 07 05:35 PM |
video: Photosynth + Seadragon = "All your photos are belong to us" | AnonGoo | Digital Photography | 10 | June 26th 07 10:36 PM |
Here it is: the "dick in a box" video from Saturday Night Live | Deep into Kristen Wiig | Digital Photography | 3 | December 22nd 06 01:04 AM |
real-time "video out" for digital cameras? | Scott Speck | Digital ZLR Cameras | 8 | May 31st 06 10:42 PM |