A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

d70 vs 20D



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 26th 04, 12:59 AM
dajaxon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default d70 vs 20D

Is it fair to compare D70 with 20D technology?
Aren't these over a year apart in GA

I shoot with both and slightly prefer the 20D


  #2  
Old December 26th 04, 02:42 AM
Musty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"dajaxon" wrote in message
...
Is it fair to compare D70 with 20D technology?
Aren't these over a year apart in GA

I shoot with both and slightly prefer the 20D



I would say it is not a fair comparison. The 20D is a level above the D70.
But hey, you have both, so why ask even?

One thing I dis-like about the D70 is the more consumer-like feel to it.
Maybe this is not important to some. Also it appears to be far more noisy.
Seems like the 20D has very low noise, even up to 1600 ISO (also 5fps and
super fast AF is hard to beat). I originally considered buying the D70 (when
10D was around). I waited (luckily) and as soon as the 20D came out, I
bought it - I love it.


  #3  
Old December 27th 04, 08:35 AM
dajaxon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I didn't ask - I was answering another post about the comparison


  #4  
Old December 30th 04, 12:18 AM
AustinMN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

dajaxon wrote:
I didn't ask - I was answering another post about the comparison


Ah, but because you changed the subject, (or maybe it's just your newsreader
or ISP), it shows up as a new thread. And because you didn't quote anything
from the post you were replying to, it looks just like a brand new thread.
There is no way for us to tell who or what thread you are replying to.

Austin

  #5  
Old December 31st 04, 05:28 AM
dajaxon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

dajaxon wrote:
I didn't ask - I was answering another post about the comparison


Ah, but because you changed the subject, (or maybe it's just your newsreader
or ISP), it shows up as a new thread. And because you didn't quote anything
from the post you were replying to, it looks just like a brand new thread.
There is no way for us to tell who or what thread you are replying to.

Austin
===========
oh well ...


  #6  
Old December 31st 04, 05:34 AM
John McWilliams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

dajaxon wrote:

dajaxon wrote:

I didn't ask - I was answering another post about the comparison



Ah, but because you changed the subject, (or maybe it's just your newsreader
or ISP), it shows up as a new thread. And because you didn't quote anything
from the post you were replying to, it looks just like a brand new thread.
There is no way for us to tell who or what thread you are replying to.

It was a new thread. daj's first post had no Refs. in the headers.

--
John McWilliams
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.