|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
April 29th 08, 05:50 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
The nose knows
|
|
#2
April 29th 08, 11:10 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
The nose knows
"wintermute" wrote in message news:2008042909505816807-nospam@nocom... A rather shallow depth of field, for my taste, given this shot.
|
|
#3
April 30th 08, 02:35 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
The nose knows
On 2008-04-29 15:10:53 -0700, "Charles" said:
"wintermute" wrote in message news:2008042909505816807-nospam@nocom... A rather shallow depth of field, for my taste, given this shot. It was entirely intentional, but thanks for the critique.
|
|
#4
May 2nd 08, 07:16 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
The nose knows
In article 2008042918354416807-nospam@nocom,
wintermute wrote: On 2008-04-29 15:10:53 -0700, "Charles" said: "wintermute" wrote in message news:2008042909505816807-nospam@nocom... A rather shallow depth of field, for my taste, given this shot. It was entirely intentional, but thanks for the critique. Maybe a closer shot would do the trick. The nose is such a small part of your image. Here's a quick example: http://www.pixelmemory.us/misc/dognose.jpg It's a crummy photo but it shows what perspective distortion can do for you. -- Block Google's spam and enjoy Usenet again. Reply with Google and I won't hear from you.
|
|
#5
May 2nd 08, 06:08 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
The nose knows
On 2008-05-01 23:16:54 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie said:
In article 2008042918354416807-nospam@nocom, wintermute wrote: On 2008-04-29 15:10:53 -0700, "Charles" said: "wintermute" wrote in message news:2008042909505816807-nospam@nocom... A rather shallow depth of field, for my taste, given this shot. It was entirely intentional, but thanks for the critique. Maybe a closer shot would do the trick. The nose is such a small part of your image. Here's a quick example: http://www.pixelmemory.us/misc/dognose.jpg It's a crummy photo but it shows what perspective distortion can do for you. Yup, I would have liked to get closer, the lens I used was the Canon 50mm f1.8 prime (80mm on my 30D). I was as close as I could get and still get the nose in focus. Maybe some day I'll be able to justify a nice macro lens.
|
|
#6
May 3rd 08, 06:43 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
The nose knows
In article 2008050210084916807-nospam@nocom,
wintermute wrote: On 2008-05-01 23:16:54 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie said: In article 2008042918354416807-nospam@nocom, wintermute wrote: On 2008-04-29 15:10:53 -0700, "Charles" said: "wintermute" wrote in message news:2008042909505816807-nospam@nocom... A rather shallow depth of field, for my taste, given this shot. It was entirely intentional, but thanks for the critique. Maybe a closer shot would do the trick. The nose is such a small part of your image. Here's a quick example: http://www.pixelmemory.us/misc/dognose.jpg It's a crummy photo but it shows what perspective distortion can do for you. Yup, I would have liked to get closer, the lens I used was the Canon 50mm f1.8 prime (80mm on my 30D). I was as close as I could get and still get the nose in focus. Maybe some day I'll be able to justify a nice macro lens. I used a Canon 10-22mm EF-S lens. Expensive, but fun. -- Block Google's spam and enjoy Usenet again. Reply with Google and I won't hear from you.
|
|
#7
May 3rd 08, 09:28 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
The nose knows
On 2008-05-02 22:43:01 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie said:
In article 2008050210084916807-nospam@nocom, wintermute wrote: On 2008-05-01 23:16:54 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie said: In article 2008042918354416807-nospam@nocom, wintermute wrote: On 2008-04-29 15:10:53 -0700, "Charles" said: "wintermute" wrote in message news:2008042909505816807-nospam@nocom... A rather shallow depth of field, for my taste, given this shot. It was entirely intentional, but thanks for the critique. Maybe a closer shot would do the trick. The nose is such a small part of your image. Here's a quick example: http://www.pixelmemory.us/misc/dognose.jpg It's a crummy photo but it shows what perspective distortion can do for you. Yup, I would have liked to get closer, the lens I used was the Canon 50mm f1.8 prime (80mm on my 30D). I was as close as I could get and still get the nose in focus. Maybe some day I'll be able to justify a nice macro lens. I used a Canon 10-22mm EF-S lens. Expensive, but fun. That is likely the next lens. My old film cameras and lenses had a nice wide end to them. I was shocked when I went digital and learned about the less than full frame APC-C sensor and the 1.6x Focal length multiplier. Not quite as shocked at the price of Digital full frame cameras though! Just hard to justify for a hobby. Or more importantly very hard to get past 'management' as it were. ;+) -- thepixelfreak
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 40D NOSE MACROS! | Annika1980 | Digital Photography | 8 | January 20th 08 05:45 AM |
| 40D NOSE MACROS! | Annika1980 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 8 | January 20th 08 05:45 AM |
| Canon S1 IS on the nose | nesredep egrob | Digital Photography | 24 | December 11th 04 09:00 AM |
| OT "Who Nose" ? | Ivan Kuturcockoff | In The Darkroom | 1 | May 8th 04 08:10 PM |
| nose/eye - Passed Out, Part Two | Dan Quinn | In The Darkroom | 4 | January 27th 04 09:14 PM |
Linear Mode
