If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
I've been thinking about how I would like an ideal camera to operate. My
first "real" camera was an aperture priority SLR, so I generally work that way. Now we can set the ISO on a per-shot basis, there's another immediate degree of freedom to play with. Entry-level Nikon DSLRs frustrate me, because they don't have a dedicated ISO button. Others, like the Canons suit me because they do. I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. So, what would I do differently? I want to be able to control aperture, shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation. Rather than going into the menu system or rotating a dial to select from a range of a modes (e.g. aperture or shutter priority), I'd like to be able to directly and immediately change any one of those parameters, or have the camera set one or more of them for me. I'm not saying the following user interface is the best way to implement that kind of idea, but just for the sake of having something to think through, imagine a camera with four thumb wheels, one for each parameter. (The settings are displayed in the perfect way for you, whatever that is.) The aperture wheel would take you through all the apertures available on the attached lens, plus "auto". The shutter speed wheel would give you all the speeds the camera can do, including "auto" and timed exposure. The ISO wheel would take you through all the values the camera can do, plus "auto". The exposure compensation wheel would work just like they do now. Liveview would allow "auto" modes to prevent over or under exposure. With something like that I could emulate conventional full manual; program auto; I could do a full auto with auto ISO as well; I could do aperture, shutter speed, and ISO priority; and I could combine things like auto shutter speed and ISO with manual aperture. The camera would need some principles to guide it's choices in the auto modes, like, "try to keep the shutter speed above the reciprocal of the focal length", and, "keep the noise down". You could incorporate multiple preset or custom auto modes for each parameter to give greater control over behaviour. But that's kinda what I'm trying to get away from - rather than having a bunch of fancy modes that you have to remember what they do, just roll a wheel to where you want it for the applicable parameter. Thoughts? :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
Wilba wrote:
I've been thinking about how I would like an ideal camera to operate. My first "real" camera was an aperture priority SLR, so I generally work that way. Now we can set the ISO on a per-shot basis, there's another immediate degree of freedom to play with. Entry-level Nikon DSLRs frustrate me, because they don't have a dedicated ISO button. Others, like the Canons suit me because they do. I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. So, what would I do differently? I want to be able to control aperture, shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation. Rather than going into the menu system or rotating a dial to select from a range of a modes (e.g. aperture or shutter priority), I'd like to be able to directly and immediately change any one of those parameters, or have the camera set one or more of them for me. I'm not saying the following user interface is the best way to implement that kind of idea, but just for the sake of having something to think through, imagine a camera with four thumb wheels, one for each parameter. (The settings are displayed in the perfect way for you, whatever that is.) The aperture wheel would take you through all the apertures available on the attached lens, plus "auto". The shutter speed wheel would give you all the speeds the camera can do, including "auto" and timed exposure. The ISO wheel would take you through all the values the camera can do, plus "auto". The exposure compensation wheel would work just like they do now. Liveview would allow "auto" modes to prevent over or under exposure. With something like that I could emulate conventional full manual; program auto; I could do a full auto with auto ISO as well; I could do aperture, shutter speed, and ISO priority; and I could combine things like auto shutter speed and ISO with manual aperture. The camera would need some principles to guide it's choices in the auto modes, like, "try to keep the shutter speed above the reciprocal of the focal length", and, "keep the noise down". You could incorporate multiple preset or custom auto modes for each parameter to give greater control over behaviour. But that's kinda what I'm trying to get away from - rather than having a bunch of fancy modes that you have to remember what they do, just roll a wheel to where you want it for the applicable parameter. Thoughts? :-) Sounds good. So it goes into aperture priority mode when turning that dial and shutter priority after changing that dial? Can I have a button to zero out exposure compensation also? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
Paul Furman wrote:
Wilba wrote: I've been thinking about how I would like an ideal camera to operate. My first "real" camera was an aperture priority SLR, so I generally work that way. Now we can set the ISO on a per-shot basis, there's another immediate degree of freedom to play with. Entry-level Nikon DSLRs frustrate me, because they don't have a dedicated ISO button. Others, like the Canons suit me because they do. I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. So, what would I do differently? I want to be able to control aperture, shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation. Rather than going into the menu system or rotating a dial to select from a range of a modes (e.g. aperture or shutter priority), I'd like to be able to directly and immediately change any one of those parameters, or have the camera set one or more of them for me. I'm not saying the following user interface is the best way to implement that kind of idea, but just for the sake of having something to think through, imagine a camera with four thumb wheels, one for each parameter. (The settings are displayed in the perfect way for you, whatever that is.) The aperture wheel would take you through all the apertures available on the attached lens, plus "auto". The shutter speed wheel would give you all the speeds the camera can do, including "auto" and timed exposure. The ISO wheel would take you through all the values the camera can do, plus "auto". The exposure compensation wheel would work just like they do now. Liveview would allow "auto" modes to prevent over or under exposure. With something like that I could emulate conventional full manual; program auto; I could do a full auto with auto ISO as well; I could do aperture, shutter speed, and ISO priority; and I could combine things like auto shutter speed and ISO with manual aperture. The camera would need some principles to guide it's choices in the auto modes, like, "try to keep the shutter speed above the reciprocal of the focal length", and, "keep the noise down". You could incorporate multiple preset or custom auto modes for each parameter to give greater control over behaviour. But that's kinda what I'm trying to get away from - rather than having a bunch of fancy modes that you have to remember what they do, just roll a wheel to where you want it for the applicable parameter. Thoughts? :-) Sounds good. So it goes into aperture priority mode when turning that dial and shutter priority after changing that dial? The way I imagine it is like this ... You either set a specific value for the parameters (e.g. f/8, 1/250th, ISO 100, -0.5ev), or you say to the camera, choose it for me. It doesn't make any guesses about your intentions. If you specify something like ISO 100, 1/250th, and auto aperture, you have conventional shutter priority. If you then turn the aperture from auto to f/8, you would be in full manual mode - the ISO and shutter speed settings would only change when you moved their wheels. Can I have a button to zero out exposure compensation also? You can have whatever you want :-), but on my ideal camera, you would just turn the wheel to zero. You could do something like push a wheel in to zero/cancel that parameter. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
On Feb 15, 3:01 am, "Wilba" wrote:
I've been thinking about how I would like an ideal camera to operate. My first "real" camera was an aperture priority SLR, so I generally work that way. Now we can set the ISO on a per-shot basis, there's another immediate degree of freedom to play with. Entry-level Nikon DSLRs frustrate me, because they don't have a dedicated ISO button. Others, like the Canons suit me because they do. I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. So, what would I do differently? I want to be able to control aperture, shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation. Rather than going into the menu system or rotating a dial to select from a range of a modes (e.g. aperture or shutter priority), I'd like to be able to directly and immediately change any one of those parameters, or have the camera set one or more of them for me. I'm not saying the following user interface is the best way to implement that kind of idea, but just for the sake of having something to think through, imagine a camera with four thumb wheels, one for each parameter. (The settings are displayed in the perfect way for you, whatever that is.) The aperture wheel would take you through all the apertures available on the attached lens, plus "auto". The shutter speed wheel would give you all the speeds the camera can do, including "auto" and timed exposure. The ISO wheel would take you through all the values the camera can do, plus "auto". The exposure compensation wheel would work just like they do now. Liveview would allow "auto" modes to prevent over or under exposure. With something like that I could emulate conventional full manual; program auto; I could do a full auto with auto ISO as well; I could do aperture, shutter speed, and ISO priority; and I could combine things like auto shutter speed and ISO with manual aperture. The camera would need some principles to guide it's choices in the auto modes, like, "try to keep the shutter speed above the reciprocal of the focal length", and, "keep the noise down". You could incorporate multiple preset or custom auto modes for each parameter to give greater control over behaviour. But that's kinda what I'm trying to get away from - rather than having a bunch of fancy modes that you have to remember what they do, just roll a wheel to where you want it for the applicable parameter. Thoughts? :-) Change... that is the biggest issue it would require a fundamental change in the way millions of people are already using their cameras and thus make purchasing a "new" design less appealing even if it has more megapixels. :-) Rather than the wheels idea, frankly putting enough of them and in positions and sizes that I would like would be difficult, I would rather see program modes that I could really program with some fuzzy logic, i.e. aperture in the 7.1-10 range weighted towards 8, shutter speed no slower than 1/250th, and the ISO between 100 and 1250 weighted towards the lower numbers. This would be for shooting dog sports outside with the 70-200. Now the problem with that is "who would really use it?" My feeling is that most consumer grade DSLR's (in my mind anything under $4K) are shot in the P mode or the infamous "green box." You know the type who just wants to take pictures and not think about what the camera is really doing. Hasn't a clue about aperture or DOF and doesn't want to learn. The manufacturers put just enough "extras" on the camera so people feel "Wow I'll never be able to use all these features; this must be a great camera." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
Wilba wrote:
I've been thinking about how I would like an ideal camera to operate. My first "real" camera was an aperture priority SLR, so I generally work that way. Now we can set the ISO on a per-shot basis, there's another immediate degree of freedom to play with. Entry-level Nikon DSLRs frustrate me, because they don't have a dedicated ISO button. Others, like the Canons suit me because they do. I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. So, what would I do differently? I want to be able to control aperture, shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation. Rather than going into the menu system or rotating a dial to select from a range of a modes (e.g. aperture or shutter priority), I'd like to be able to directly and immediately change any one of those parameters, or have the camera set one or more of them for me. I'm not saying the following user interface is the best way to implement that kind of idea, but just for the sake of having something to think through, imagine a camera with four thumb wheels, one for each parameter. (The settings are displayed in the perfect way for you, whatever that is.) The aperture wheel would take you through all the apertures available on the attached lens, plus "auto". The shutter speed wheel would give you all the speeds the camera can do, including "auto" and timed exposure. The ISO wheel would take you through all the values the camera can do, plus "auto". The exposure compensation wheel would work just like they do now. Liveview would allow "auto" modes to prevent over or under exposure. With something like that I could emulate conventional full manual; program auto; I could do a full auto with auto ISO as well; I could do aperture, shutter speed, and ISO priority; and I could combine things like auto shutter speed and ISO with manual aperture. The camera would need some principles to guide it's choices in the auto modes, like, "try to keep the shutter speed above the reciprocal of the focal length", and, "keep the noise down". You could incorporate multiple preset or custom auto modes for each parameter to give greater control over behaviour. But that's kinda what I'm trying to get away from - rather than having a bunch of fancy modes that you have to remember what they do, just roll a wheel to where you want it for the applicable parameter. Thoughts? :-) How about putting an aperture ring on the lens? And then shutter speed on a dial on top of the camera. That means that you only have to find space for the iso and the exposure comp adjustments. But you don't really need an exposure comp ring. The meter reading needs to be shown in the viewfinder and you do the exposure comp by either adjusting the aperture or the shutter speed or the ISO dial. So we are down to three controls: shutter speed, aperture, and ISO number. The ISO control can be under your thumb on the camera back. Of course you understand that with the exception of the ISO control, I've just re-invented the old manual film camera. Lenses today don't come with aperture rings (though they could) so perhaps it could be built into an extended lens mount done so that the lens fits into the lens mount, not onto it. That way only the body has to be changed. Of course I'd want a full readout in the viewfinder. As a byproduct, you could, with a suitable screen, also turn off autofocus and do it manualy, but you can do that now with most if not all lenses. -- --- Paul J. Gans |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
Wilba wrote:
I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. Thoughts? :-) Try a camera with 2 wheels, like the xxD-series from Canon. Mode finger wheel Thumb wheel [] n/a n/a P shift aperture vs. exposure exposure compensation Tv exposure time exposure compensation Av aperture exposure compensation M exposure time aperture A-DEP n/a exposure compensation [] == green square aka full-auto non-technical grandmom compatible mode -Wolfgang |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
JimKramer wrote:
Wilba wrote: I've been thinking about how I would like an ideal camera to operate. My first "real" camera was an aperture priority SLR, so I generally work that way. Now we can set the ISO on a per-shot basis, there's another immediate degree of freedom to play with. Entry-level Nikon DSLRs frustrate me, because they don't have a dedicated ISO button. Others, like the Canons suit me because they do. I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. So, what would I do differently? I want to be able to control aperture, shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation. Rather than going into the menu system or rotating a dial to select from a range of a modes (e.g. aperture or shutter priority), I'd like to be able to directly and immediately change any one of those parameters, or have the camera set one or more of them for me. I'm not saying the following user interface is the best way to implement that kind of idea, but just for the sake of having something to think through, imagine a camera with four thumb wheels, one for each parameter. (The settings are displayed in the perfect way for you, whatever that is.) The aperture wheel would take you through all the apertures available on the attached lens, plus "auto". The shutter speed wheel would give you all the speeds the camera can do, including "auto" and timed exposure. The ISO wheel would take you through all the values the camera can do, plus "auto". The exposure compensation wheel would work just like they do now. Liveview would allow "auto" modes to prevent over or under exposure. With something like that I could emulate conventional full manual; program auto; I could do a full auto with auto ISO as well; I could do aperture, shutter speed, and ISO priority; and I could combine things like auto shutter speed and ISO with manual aperture. The camera would need some principles to guide it's choices in the auto modes, like, "try to keep the shutter speed above the reciprocal of the focal length", and, "keep the noise down". You could incorporate multiple preset or custom auto modes for each parameter to give greater control over behaviour. But that's kinda what I'm trying to get away from - rather than having a bunch of fancy modes that you have to remember what they do, just roll a wheel to where you want it for the applicable parameter. Thoughts? :-) Change... that is the biggest issue it would require a fundamental change in the way millions of people are already using their cameras and thus make purchasing a "new" design less appealing even if it has more megapixels. :-) Oh, didn't I say ... it would have a reasonably low number of huge pixels, for great, low-noise, low light performance. :-) Rather than the wheels idea, frankly putting enough of them and in positions and sizes that I would like would be difficult, Yes, illustrating with wheels is just to give people the oportunity to think it through with a familiar user interface mechanism. I'd probably use up-and-down buttons or rockers. Rockers would be good because you can have a press-in operation for things like zeroing exposure compensation. I would rather see program modes that I could really program with some fuzzy logic, i.e. aperture in the 7.1-10 range weighted towards 8, shutter speed no slower than 1/250th, and the ISO between 100 and 1250 weighted towards the lower numbers. This would be for shooting dog sports outside with the 70-200. Now the problem with that is "who would really use it?" Exactly. :-) I generally (not just in photography), find myself going back to simple or manual control modes because the designer of a fancy function has the made the wrong assumptions about how I want the device to behave, and I have to outsmart it to get what I want. My feeling is that most consumer grade DSLR's (in my mind anything under $4K) are shot in the P mode or the infamous "green box." You know the type who just wants to take pictures and not think about what the camera is really doing. Hasn't a clue about aperture or DOF and doesn't want to learn. The manufacturers put just enough "extras" on the camera so people feel "Wow I'll never be able to use all these features; this must be a great camera." Yeah, but I'm talking about what _I_ want, not what the camera manufacturers or the ignorant want. :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
Paul J Gans wrote:
Wilba wrote: I've been thinking about how I would like an ideal camera to operate. My first "real" camera was an aperture priority SLR, so I generally work that way. Now we can set the ISO on a per-shot basis, there's another immediate degree of freedom to play with. Entry-level Nikon DSLRs frustrate me, because they don't have a dedicated ISO button. Others, like the Canons suit me because they do. I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. So, what would I do differently? I want to be able to control aperture, shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation. Rather than going into the menu system or rotating a dial to select from a range of a modes (e.g. aperture or shutter priority), I'd like to be able to directly and immediately change any one of those parameters, or have the camera set one or more of them for me. I'm not saying the following user interface is the best way to implement that kind of idea, but just for the sake of having something to think through, imagine a camera with four thumb wheels, one for each parameter. (The settings are displayed in the perfect way for you, whatever that is.) The aperture wheel would take you through all the apertures available on the attached lens, plus "auto". The shutter speed wheel would give you all the speeds the camera can do, including "auto" and timed exposure. The ISO wheel would take you through all the values the camera can do, plus "auto". The exposure compensation wheel would work just like they do now. Liveview would allow "auto" modes to prevent over or under exposure. With something like that I could emulate conventional full manual; program auto; I could do a full auto with auto ISO as well; I could do aperture, shutter speed, and ISO priority; and I could combine things like auto shutter speed and ISO with manual aperture. The camera would need some principles to guide it's choices in the auto modes, like, "try to keep the shutter speed above the reciprocal of the focal length", and, "keep the noise down". You could incorporate multiple preset or custom auto modes for each parameter to give greater control over behaviour. But that's kinda what I'm trying to get away from - rather than having a bunch of fancy modes that you have to remember what they do, just roll a wheel to where you want it for the applicable parameter. Thoughts? :-) How about putting an aperture ring on the lens? And then shutter speed on a dial on top of the camera. That means that you only have to find space for the iso and the exposure comp adjustments. But you don't really need an exposure comp ring. The meter reading needs to be shown in the viewfinder and you do the exposure comp by either adjusting the aperture or the shutter speed or the ISO dial. That system doesn't incorporate the idea that I described. It's not about the user interface, it's about the functionality. So we are down to three controls: shutter speed, aperture, and ISO number. The ISO control can be under your thumb on the camera back. Of course you understand that with the exception of the ISO control, I've just re-invented the old manual film camera. Lenses today don't come with aperture rings (though they could) so perhaps it could be built into an extended lens mount done so that the lens fits into the lens mount, not onto it. That way only the body has to be changed. Of course I'd want a full readout in the viewfinder. As a byproduct, you could, with a suitable screen, also turn off autofocus and do it manualy, but you can do that now with most if not all lenses. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:
Wilba wrote: I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. Thoughts? :-) Try a camera with 2 wheels, like the xxD-series from Canon. Mode finger wheel Thumb wheel [] n/a n/a P shift aperture vs. exposure exposure compensation Tv exposure time exposure compensation Av aperture exposure compensation M exposure time aperture A-DEP n/a exposure compensation [] == green square aka full-auto non-technical grandmom compatible mode Can you change the ISO with one touch? Do they do "auto ISO"? It's not about the wheels. :-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pondering Functionality
Wilba wrote:
Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: Wilba wrote: I use exposure compensation a lot. On the few DSLRs I have used, setting it is a PITA - I can't think of many user interfaces more awkward than holding down a tiny button near the shutter with my index finger, while turning a wheel with the thumb of the same hand. Thoughts? :-) Try a camera with 2 wheels, like the xxD-series from Canon. Mode finger wheel Thumb wheel [] n/a n/a P shift aperture vs. exposure exposure compensation Tv exposure time exposure compensation Av aperture exposure compensation M exposure time aperture A-DEP n/a exposure compensation [] == green square aka full-auto non-technical grandmom compatible mode Can you change the ISO with one touch? Do they do "auto ISO"? It's not about the wheels. :-) On the Canon 40d, changing ISO is a two step process. The ISO button is directly behind the finger wheel - tap it with your index finger. You then use the finger wheel to change the ISO, same finger. Auto ISO is directly below 100 ISO. -- Len |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur's pondering on f-stop and such . . D70s | Ole Kvaal | Digital SLR Cameras | 23 | January 14th 08 12:50 AM |
digital camera recommendations with short video functionality | Ken[_2_] | Digital Photography | 11 | February 25th 07 10:10 AM |
Nikon functionality? | PeteD | Digital Photography | 8 | May 7th 06 11:05 PM |
Pondering purchase of a Graflex Press camera | klink | Large Format Photography Equipment | 5 | May 31st 04 03:21 PM |