A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Microsoft's goals for 2006



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 30th 05, 05:25 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,comp.os.linux.advocacy,rec.photo.digital
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Microsoft's goals for 2006

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:32:13 -0800, Paul Allen "paul dot l dot allen
at comcast dot net" wrote:

re
of Elephantiasis in the same timeframe.


It wasn't about money, but rather about preventing Microsoft from
flooding the market with their proprietary version of Java. Sun
won, big time, although it's not clear what that win means for
their long-term survival. Java's on what, it's third GUI toolkit?
I was just thinking about learning Swing, and now it's out and
something else is in. That's a platform without a long-term
strategy. :-(

Paul Allen


Unfortunately, yes. The problem for Sun has always been that deep
down Scott McNealy is a hardware guy. That is what gets his interest,
not software.

On top of all that, it is hard for the Java programs at Sun to
justify their existence unless they can "monetize" Java.

And you also see some of the confusion in the strategy about such
issues as exactly who controls the future of Java.

Now, a whole 'nother story is the confusion regarding Solaris X86, but
we'll save that one for a different flame war.


  #2  
Old January 1st 06, 01:04 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,comp.os.linux.advocacy,rec.photo.digital
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Microsoft's goals for 2006

Father Kodak wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:32:13 -0800, Paul Allen "paul dot l dot allen
at comcast dot net" wrote:

re
of Elephantiasis in the same timeframe.

It wasn't about money, but rather about preventing Microsoft from
flooding the market with their proprietary version of Java. Sun
won, big time, although it's not clear what that win means for
their long-term survival. Java's on what, it's third GUI toolkit?
I was just thinking about learning Swing, and now it's out and
something else is in. That's a platform without a long-term
strategy. :-(

Paul Allen


Unfortunately, yes. The problem for Sun has always been that deep
down Scott McNealy is a hardware guy. That is what gets his interest,
not software.

On top of all that, it is hard for the Java programs at Sun to
justify their existence unless they can "monetize" Java.


Java Server Pages, anyone? Java on databases, like Oracle?

And you also see some of the confusion in the strategy about such
issues as exactly who controls the future of Java.

Now, a whole 'nother story is the confusion regarding Solaris X86, but
we'll save that one for a different flame war.


Dey doin ok, esp hitching onto the Open Office cattle train.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.