If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
People who top post should be banned from Usenet
Roger Hunt wrote:
In article , Paul Schmidt wrote Top posting, I think originated, because most Useneters have the annoying habit, of quoting everything from the entire thread, then adding one or two lines to the end. If you add your "ya man" to the top, then people don't need to scroll all the way through 47,654,251 lines of crap to find that your quoting a quote of a quote of a quote, and that there is 6 lines of content, and 47,654,245 lines of crap.... Does that include the 3,156,883 lines of flamboyant sig? Yes, and another 6,342,472 lines of "and so and so wrote" even when whatever they wrote has no meaning anymore, because it's lost in the stuff.... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
People who top post should be banned from Usenet
In article , Paul Schmidt
wrote Roger Hunt wrote: In article , Paul Schmidt wrote Top posting, I think originated, because most Useneters have the annoying habit, of quoting everything from the entire thread, then adding one or two lines to the end. If you add your "ya man" to the top, then people don't need to scroll all the way through 47,654,251 lines of crap to find that your quoting a quote of a quote of a quote, and that there is 6 lines of content, and 47,654,245 lines of crap.... Does that include the 3,156,883 lines of flamboyant sig? Yes, and another 6,342,472 lines of "and so and so wrote" even when whatever they wrote has no meaning anymore, because it's lost in the stuff.... g I suppose that's marginally better than the half-arsed snip that loses portions of the info, or puts things out of context (mind you it's great fun when trolling). -- Roger Hunt |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
People who top post should be banned from Usenet
Top post? Top post? Did you say Top post? *******s.
"DJ" wrote in message ... so do I..... wrote in message news:40636E48.19247.9D125B@localhost... At least that is what Steve Young opines and i personally agree with him |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
People who top post should be banned from Usenet
Top posting is "bad?"
What a bunch of idiots! "Canongirly" wrote in message ... Top post? Top post? Did you say Top post? *******s. "DJ" wrote in message ... so do I..... wrote in message news:40636E48.19247.9D125B@localhost... At least that is what Steve Young opines and i personally agree with him |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
People who top post should be banned from Usenet
Although not germane to a photography group... although I guess it
could apply due to interest, many groups have blind posters such as many of the ham radio groups and reflectors. There, top posting is not only accepted, but requested. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:23:36 -0500, Paul Schmidt wrote: wrote: At least that is what Steve Young opines and i personally agree with him Top posting, I think originated, because most Useneters have the annoying habit, of quoting everything from the entire thread, then adding one or two lines to the end. If you add your "ya man" to the top, then people don't need to scroll all the way through 47,654,251 lines of crap to find that your quoting a quote of a quote of a quote, and that there is 6 lines of content, and 47,654,245 lines of crap.... Paul |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
snip What are we talking about? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
People who top post should be banned from Usenet
Paul Schmidt
Yes, and another 6,342,472 lines of "and so and so wrote" even when whatever they wrote has no meaning anymore, because it's lost in the stuff.... "Roger Hunt" wrote g I suppose that's marginally better than the half-arsed snip that loses portions of the info, or puts things out of context (mind you it's great fun when trolling). like one of our favorites? (msxmanic?) -- A newbie's first Usenet encounter occurs without a prophylactic |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
People who top post should be banned from Usenet
In article ,
Steve Young wrote Paul Schmidt Yes, and another 6,342,472 lines of "and so and so wrote" even when whatever they wrote has no meaning anymore, because it's lost in the stuff.... "Roger Hunt" wrote g I suppose that's marginally better than the half-arsed snip that loses portions of the info, or puts things out of context (mind you it's great fun when trolling). like one of our favorites? (msxmanic?) Thanks for the tip, I shall peruse the archives ... ;-) -- Roger Hunt |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
In article , fmaas
wrote snip What are we talking about? We're talking about snip, of course, as in subject line. -- Roger Hunt |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
People who top post should be banned from Usenet
The most irritating pepul are doze dat cant spell and don use punchuation
"Pepys" wrote in message ... Me too "Tony Spadaro" wrote in message om... I'll go along with that. -- http://www.chapelhillnoir.com home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto The Improved Links Pages are at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html A sample chapter from my novel "Haight-Ashbury" is at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html "DJ" wrote in message ... so do I..... wrote in message news:40636E48.19247.9D125B@localhost... At least that is what Steve Young opines and i personally agree with him |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash | elchief | In The Darkroom | 3 | April 7th 04 10:20 AM |