If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Casio QV-R61
Has anybody seen a review of this camera? I want to see some sample
pictures. Does anyone have one? thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hi, i considered this camera and searched for reviews but found none. It's a follow-up to the award-winning and excellent qv-r61. If it uses the same processing then I expect the images to be equally excellent. I considered it but then chose to get a camera with full manual controls and raw, as the qv-r61 only has scene modes and jpeg. But for a compact P&S, this camera would probably be one of my top choices, if it's actually as good as the qv-r51, and if it can focus reliably in low light. the qv-r51 didn't have an af-assist light, but the qv-r61 has some focus feature over the qv-r51 but i'm not sure if it's af-assist or what. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Strange that YOU are the same and only person that answered about the Fuji
cameras. Seems that we think alike about cameras. I keep vacillating between the Fuji 810 and 550 and in looking I found the announcement about the QV-R61. I still have a QV-2000UX my first digital and still use it to take pictures through a microscope for work. I found these pictures taken with the QV-R61 taken by some guy and to me they don't look just right, many look out of focus. Since they weren't taken by one of the review sites under similar conditions as other cameras, I'm afraid to use these pictures to make a decision. What do you think? http://tarantor.net/casioqvr61/ "Sabineellen" wrote in message ... Hi, i considered this camera and searched for reviews but found none. It's a follow-up to the award-winning and excellent qv-r61. If it uses the same processing then I expect the images to be equally excellent. I considered it but then chose to get a camera with full manual controls and raw, as the qv-r61 only has scene modes and jpeg. But for a compact P&S, this camera would probably be one of my top choices, if it's actually as good as the qv-r51, and if it can focus reliably in low light. the qv-r51 didn't have an af-assist light, but the qv-r61 has some focus feature over the qv-r51 but i'm not sure if it's af-assist or what. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Strange that YOU are the same and only person that answered about the Fuji
cameras. Seems that we think alike about cameras. I keep vacillating between the Fuji 810 and 550 and in looking I found the announcement about the QV-R61. I still have a QV-2000UX my first digital and still use it to take pictures through a microscope for work. I found these pictures taken with the QV-R61 taken by some guy and to me they don't look just right, many look out of focus. Since they weren't taken by one of the review sites under similar conditions as other cameras, I'm afraid to use these pictures to make a decision. What do you think? http://tarantor.net/casioqvr61/ "Sabineellen" wrote in message ... Hi, i considered this camera and searched for reviews but found none. It's a follow-up to the award-winning and excellent qv-r61. If it uses the same processing then I expect the images to be equally excellent. I considered it but then chose to get a camera with full manual controls and raw, as the qv-r61 only has scene modes and jpeg. But for a compact P&S, this camera would probably be one of my top choices, if it's actually as good as the qv-r51, and if it can focus reliably in low light. the qv-r51 didn't have an af-assist light, but the qv-r61 has some focus feature over the qv-r51 but i'm not sure if it's af-assist or what. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Strange that YOU are the same and only person that answered about the Fuji cameras. Seems that we think alike about cameras. I keep vacillating between the Fuji 810 and 550 and in looking I found the announcement about the QV-R61. I still have a QV-2000UX my first digital and still use it to take pictures through a microscope for work. I found these pictures taken with the QV-R61 taken by some guy and to me they don't look just right, many look out of focus. Since they weren't taken by one of the review sites under similar conditions as other cameras, I'm afraid to use these pictures to make a decision. What do you think? http://tarantor.net/casioqvr61/ Hi, maybe we do think alike about cameras. Please note that when I said the QV-R51 it takes excellent photos i meant for a P&S in its class, size and price. I've never owned it, but I know it won a DIMA 2004 award for image quality, though the main issue that was in consideration i think was color accuracy. But those images actually look quite similar to what I would've expected the QV-R51 to look like, though a little too saturated. Also that it's difficult to judge them because I know the camera has many different scene modes and I'm not sure what this guy used. You say out of focus, well that wouldn't surprise me if they are, and here's why; I'm not sure the camera has a sharp lens, or an accurate focusing mechanism, and especially in low light. Same applies to HP cameras that are very good P&Ss but suffer from this soft/poor focusing issue. The Fujis certainly have sharper lenses. The low light focusing issue is likely to be a problem for the fuji e550 too since it doesn't have AF-Assist. That was a main reason for me to decide against both because I do like available light photography. I went with the f810 and I like it so far, though i wouldn't say it's really a P&S camera because its images seem optimized for postprocessing. I wrote about this on the dpreview fuji talk forum. Go to google and search for "fuji talk", it will be the first link that comes up. In the forums search for these two threads "i know why F810 is over contrasty..." and " F810 battery life"; I just posted an example of the exposure/contrast issue of the f810 before and after processing in the latter thread. I think you should have a look to know what to expect before you decide to buy it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Strange that YOU are the same and only person that answered about the Fuji cameras. Seems that we think alike about cameras. I keep vacillating between the Fuji 810 and 550 and in looking I found the announcement about the QV-R61. I still have a QV-2000UX my first digital and still use it to take pictures through a microscope for work. I found these pictures taken with the QV-R61 taken by some guy and to me they don't look just right, many look out of focus. Since they weren't taken by one of the review sites under similar conditions as other cameras, I'm afraid to use these pictures to make a decision. What do you think? http://tarantor.net/casioqvr61/ Hi, maybe we do think alike about cameras. Please note that when I said the QV-R51 it takes excellent photos i meant for a P&S in its class, size and price. I've never owned it, but I know it won a DIMA 2004 award for image quality, though the main issue that was in consideration i think was color accuracy. But those images actually look quite similar to what I would've expected the QV-R51 to look like, though a little too saturated. Also that it's difficult to judge them because I know the camera has many different scene modes and I'm not sure what this guy used. You say out of focus, well that wouldn't surprise me if they are, and here's why; I'm not sure the camera has a sharp lens, or an accurate focusing mechanism, and especially in low light. Same applies to HP cameras that are very good P&Ss but suffer from this soft/poor focusing issue. The Fujis certainly have sharper lenses. The low light focusing issue is likely to be a problem for the fuji e550 too since it doesn't have AF-Assist. That was a main reason for me to decide against both because I do like available light photography. I went with the f810 and I like it so far, though i wouldn't say it's really a P&S camera because its images seem optimized for postprocessing. I wrote about this on the dpreview fuji talk forum. Go to google and search for "fuji talk", it will be the first link that comes up. In the forums search for these two threads "i know why F810 is over contrasty..." and " F810 battery life"; I just posted an example of the exposure/contrast issue of the f810 before and after processing in the latter thread. I think you should have a look to know what to expect before you decide to buy it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks I will do. I agree that the R61 was for point and shoot. and I also
totally agree with the focus assist light any decent camera should have one. I also like available light photography. If the 550 had it I would have already bought it. For the money I think its hard to beat especially since they have a $50 rebate going on now. If the 810 had the rebate I would have bought it. So what I'm looking for is a smallish camera (pocket size) with a decent lens, 4x zoom, movie mode with sound, manual control and focus assist light, under $350. "Sabineellen" wrote in message ... Strange that YOU are the same and only person that answered about the Fuji cameras. Seems that we think alike about cameras. I keep vacillating between the Fuji 810 and 550 and in looking I found the announcement about the QV-R61. I still have a QV-2000UX my first digital and still use it to take pictures through a microscope for work. I found these pictures taken with the QV-R61 taken by some guy and to me they don't look just right, many look out of focus. Since they weren't taken by one of the review sites under similar conditions as other cameras, I'm afraid to use these pictures to make a decision. What do you think? http://tarantor.net/casioqvr61/ Hi, maybe we do think alike about cameras. Please note that when I said the QV-R51 it takes excellent photos i meant for a P&S in its class, size and price. I've never owned it, but I know it won a DIMA 2004 award for image quality, though the main issue that was in consideration i think was color accuracy. But those images actually look quite similar to what I would've expected the QV-R51 to look like, though a little too saturated. Also that it's difficult to judge them because I know the camera has many different scene modes and I'm not sure what this guy used. You say out of focus, well that wouldn't surprise me if they are, and here's why; I'm not sure the camera has a sharp lens, or an accurate focusing mechanism, and especially in low light. Same applies to HP cameras that are very good P&Ss but suffer from this soft/poor focusing issue. The Fujis certainly have sharper lenses. The low light focusing issue is likely to be a problem for the fuji e550 too since it doesn't have AF-Assist. That was a main reason for me to decide against both because I do like available light photography. I went with the f810 and I like it so far, though i wouldn't say it's really a P&S camera because its images seem optimized for postprocessing. I wrote about this on the dpreview fuji talk forum. Go to google and search for "fuji talk", it will be the first link that comes up. In the forums search for these two threads "i know why F810 is over contrasty..." and " F810 battery life"; I just posted an example of the exposure/contrast issue of the f810 before and after processing in the latter thread. I think you should have a look to know what to expect before you decide to buy it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Casio EX-P700 review? | Andy Turner | Digital Photography | 1 | November 10th 04 06:24 AM |
Casio Elixim EX-Z55 v Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX7 - which to buy? | Jason Sayer | Digital Photography | 0 | October 25th 04 10:54 PM |
Canon A95 vs Casio QV-R61? | Mike Henley | Digital Photography | 2 | October 20th 04 05:08 AM |
Low resolution of Casio EX-Z40 | Frank Meng | Digital Photography | 0 | August 11th 04 07:22 PM |
Casio QV-3000EX USB Problem | Clive | Digital Photography | 1 | June 27th 04 08:05 AM |