A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Large Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Russian Wood LF Cameras Quality



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 17th 04, 02:34 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stacey" wrote in message
...

Actually this is my site/camera


So you are Stacey, Steph, Kievgurl - how confusing! Can we call you Sybil
for short?


  #22  
Old November 17th 04, 06:43 PM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stacey wrote:
: jjs wrote:

: "Stacey" wrote in message
: ...
:
: http://www.geocities.com/fkd_8x10/
:
: A little help for the article which said, "On my sample the glue had given
: it up but if your's doesn't come apart like mine did, you can cut the
: pieces you need out of the frame later just as easily."
:
: Why am I not surprised that the glue is already shot.

: Actually this is my site/camera and yes the whole camera had to be taken
: apart and reglued. Appears they used some sort of shelac type glue? The
: screws were also very poor quality but the rest of the hardware was OK. It
: was a "fun" project and since then have installed a packard shutter behind
: the front standard. I think these are good looking cameras but some people
: might not think so? The good part is the bellows also seem to be made very
: well which is a problem on a lot of the old/cheap 8X10's

Sounds like thei Russian 35mm and MF cameras that I have. While the quality of
their glass is good the mechanics of the cameras themselves is poor and the
build quality and quality control is nearly non-existant.
--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #23  
Old November 17th 04, 06:43 PM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Stacey wrote:
: jjs wrote:

: "Stacey" wrote in message
: ...
:
: http://www.geocities.com/fkd_8x10/
:
: A little help for the article which said, "On my sample the glue had given
: it up but if your's doesn't come apart like mine did, you can cut the
: pieces you need out of the frame later just as easily."
:
: Why am I not surprised that the glue is already shot.

: Actually this is my site/camera and yes the whole camera had to be taken
: apart and reglued. Appears they used some sort of shelac type glue? The
: screws were also very poor quality but the rest of the hardware was OK. It
: was a "fun" project and since then have installed a packard shutter behind
: the front standard. I think these are good looking cameras but some people
: might not think so? The good part is the bellows also seem to be made very
: well which is a problem on a lot of the old/cheap 8X10's

Sounds like thei Russian 35mm and MF cameras that I have. While the quality of
their glass is good the mechanics of the cameras themselves is poor and the
build quality and quality control is nearly non-existant.
--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #24  
Old November 17th 04, 08:32 PM
Stacey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:

"Stacey" wrote in message
...

http://www.geocities.com/fkd_8x10/


A little help for the article which said, "On my sample the glue had given
it up but if your's doesn't come apart like mine did, you can cut the
pieces you need out of the frame later just as easily."

Why am I not surprised that the glue is already shot.


Actually this is my site/camera and yes the whole camera had to be taken
apart and reglued. Appears they used some sort of shelac type glue? The
screws were also very poor quality but the rest of the hardware was OK. It
was a "fun" project and since then have installed a packard shutter behind
the front standard. I think these are good looking cameras but some people
might not think so? The good part is the bellows also seem to be made very
well which is a problem on a lot of the old/cheap 8X10's

--

Stacey
  #25  
Old November 17th 04, 08:32 PM
Stacey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:

"Stacey" wrote in message
...

http://www.geocities.com/fkd_8x10/


A little help for the article which said, "On my sample the glue had given
it up but if your's doesn't come apart like mine did, you can cut the
pieces you need out of the frame later just as easily."

Why am I not surprised that the glue is already shot.


Actually this is my site/camera and yes the whole camera had to be taken
apart and reglued. Appears they used some sort of shelac type glue? The
screws were also very poor quality but the rest of the hardware was OK. It
was a "fun" project and since then have installed a packard shutter behind
the front standard. I think these are good looking cameras but some people
might not think so? The good part is the bellows also seem to be made very
well which is a problem on a lot of the old/cheap 8X10's

--

Stacey
  #26  
Old November 18th 04, 02:29 AM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stacey" wrote in message
...
jjs wrote:

"Stacey" wrote in message
...

Actually this is my site/camera


So you are Stacey, Steph, Kievgurl - how confusing!


Got about a half dozen more! :-)


Oh man, just don't tell me you are also Littleboy or Blank. Please.


  #27  
Old November 18th 04, 07:53 AM
Stacey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:

"Stacey" wrote in message



So you are Stacey, Steph, Kievgurl - how confusing!


Got about a half dozen more! :-)


Oh man, just don't tell me you are also Littleboy or Blank. Please.


LOL

--

Stacey
  #28  
Old November 18th 04, 02:21 PM
Stacey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

jjs wrote:

"Stacey" wrote in message
...

Actually this is my site/camera


So you are Stacey, Steph, Kievgurl - how confusing!


Got about a half dozen more! :-)
--

Stacey
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Price on Digital Cameras. Joe Walsh In The Darkroom 0 August 18th 04 09:52 AM
Best Price on Digital Cameras. Joe Walsh Digital Photography 0 August 18th 04 09:52 AM
digital cameras and flash = poor image quality?? michaelb Digital Photography 25 July 3rd 04 08:35 AM
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 9 June 19th 04 05:48 PM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.