A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Large Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Newbie question about field cameras that accept 120 rolls



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old November 16th 04, 12:11 PM
Dan Fromm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Shelley" wrote in message news:SCxld.2762$h15.2138@trnddc07...
There are also slip-in type roll holders that go in in front of the
focusing panel as sheet film holders do. But this is as inconvenient
as removing the focusing panel and replacing it with a roll holder.


Just curious. why do you think it's as inconvenient to slip a roll film
holder under the ground glass, photograph, and remove the holder as it is to
remove the ground glass frame, find a safe place to put it, insert the roll
film holder, photograph, remove the roll film holder, retrieve the ground
glass frame, and put the ground glass frame back in the camera.


Either way is time-consuming and intervenes between final
focus/compose and shooting.

The Graflok focusing panel comes off very easily. A 2x3 focusing
panel fits in a pocket, and so does a 2x3 Graflex-made roll holder.
Attaching the Graflex-made roll holder to the back puts a little less
torque on the camera than inserting a slip-in holder. I say
Graflex-made to make it clear that I'm talking about a holder made to
attach to a Graflok back.

The slip-in holder fits in a pocket, is pretty easy to insert and
remove. But everything has to be locked up tight to get it in without
shifting the camera a little.

For 2x3 both types of holders are about equally good. Or equally bad.
For 4x5, well, then the holders are larger and more-or-less equally
less conveniet. 4x5 requires larger pockets that 2x3.

Cheers,

Dan
  #32  
Old November 16th 04, 12:11 PM
Dan Fromm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Shelley" wrote in message news:SCxld.2762$h15.2138@trnddc07...
There are also slip-in type roll holders that go in in front of the
focusing panel as sheet film holders do. But this is as inconvenient
as removing the focusing panel and replacing it with a roll holder.


Just curious. why do you think it's as inconvenient to slip a roll film
holder under the ground glass, photograph, and remove the holder as it is to
remove the ground glass frame, find a safe place to put it, insert the roll
film holder, photograph, remove the roll film holder, retrieve the ground
glass frame, and put the ground glass frame back in the camera.


Either way is time-consuming and intervenes between final
focus/compose and shooting.

The Graflok focusing panel comes off very easily. A 2x3 focusing
panel fits in a pocket, and so does a 2x3 Graflex-made roll holder.
Attaching the Graflex-made roll holder to the back puts a little less
torque on the camera than inserting a slip-in holder. I say
Graflex-made to make it clear that I'm talking about a holder made to
attach to a Graflok back.

The slip-in holder fits in a pocket, is pretty easy to insert and
remove. But everything has to be locked up tight to get it in without
shifting the camera a little.

For 2x3 both types of holders are about equally good. Or equally bad.
For 4x5, well, then the holders are larger and more-or-less equally
less conveniet. 4x5 requires larger pockets that 2x3.

Cheers,

Dan
  #33  
Old November 16th 04, 02:06 PM
Shelley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I didn't write the second sentence of the first paragraph below that you
attribute to me. Someone else said that and you've merged it with the tings
I did write. But that's o.k., I still don't understand why having to remove,
store, and then replace the ground glass frame is just as inconvenient as
not having to do any of those things but I'll take your word for it. Maybe
the problem is that I live in Florida and we don't wear coats when we
photograph. : - )

"Dan Fromm" wrote in message
om...
"Shelley" wrote in message

news:SCxld.2762$h15.2138@trnddc07...
There are also slip-in type roll holders that go in in front of the
focusing panel as sheet film holders do. But this is as inconvenient
as removing the focusing panel and replacing it with a roll holder.


Just curious. why do you think it's as inconvenient to slip a roll film
holder under the ground glass, photograph, and remove the holder as it

is to
remove the ground glass frame, find a safe place to put it, insert the

roll
film holder, photograph, remove the roll film holder, retrieve the

ground
glass frame, and put the ground glass frame back in the camera.


Either way is time-consuming and intervenes between final
focus/compose and shooting.

The Graflok focusing panel comes off very easily. A 2x3 focusing
panel fits in a pocket, and so does a 2x3 Graflex-made roll holder.
Attaching the Graflex-made roll holder to the back puts a little less
torque on the camera than inserting a slip-in holder. I say
Graflex-made to make it clear that I'm talking about a holder made to
attach to a Graflok back.

The slip-in holder fits in a pocket, is pretty easy to insert and
remove. But everything has to be locked up tight to get it in without
shifting the camera a little.

For 2x3 both types of holders are about equally good. Or equally bad.
For 4x5, well, then the holders are larger and more-or-less equally
less conveniet. 4x5 requires larger pockets that 2x3.

Cheers,

Dan



  #34  
Old November 16th 04, 02:06 PM
Shelley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I didn't write the second sentence of the first paragraph below that you
attribute to me. Someone else said that and you've merged it with the tings
I did write. But that's o.k., I still don't understand why having to remove,
store, and then replace the ground glass frame is just as inconvenient as
not having to do any of those things but I'll take your word for it. Maybe
the problem is that I live in Florida and we don't wear coats when we
photograph. : - )

"Dan Fromm" wrote in message
om...
"Shelley" wrote in message

news:SCxld.2762$h15.2138@trnddc07...
There are also slip-in type roll holders that go in in front of the
focusing panel as sheet film holders do. But this is as inconvenient
as removing the focusing panel and replacing it with a roll holder.


Just curious. why do you think it's as inconvenient to slip a roll film
holder under the ground glass, photograph, and remove the holder as it

is to
remove the ground glass frame, find a safe place to put it, insert the

roll
film holder, photograph, remove the roll film holder, retrieve the

ground
glass frame, and put the ground glass frame back in the camera.


Either way is time-consuming and intervenes between final
focus/compose and shooting.

The Graflok focusing panel comes off very easily. A 2x3 focusing
panel fits in a pocket, and so does a 2x3 Graflex-made roll holder.
Attaching the Graflex-made roll holder to the back puts a little less
torque on the camera than inserting a slip-in holder. I say
Graflex-made to make it clear that I'm talking about a holder made to
attach to a Graflok back.

The slip-in holder fits in a pocket, is pretty easy to insert and
remove. But everything has to be locked up tight to get it in without
shifting the camera a little.

For 2x3 both types of holders are about equally good. Or equally bad.
For 4x5, well, then the holders are larger and more-or-less equally
less conveniet. 4x5 requires larger pockets that 2x3.

Cheers,

Dan



  #35  
Old November 16th 04, 02:49 PM
Bandicoot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan Fromm" wrote in message
om...
[SNIP]

4x5 requires larger pockets that 2x3.


In more ways than one! ;-)


Peter


  #36  
Old November 16th 04, 02:49 PM
Bandicoot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan Fromm" wrote in message
om...
[SNIP]

4x5 requires larger pockets that 2x3.


In more ways than one! ;-)


Peter


  #37  
Old November 17th 04, 12:22 AM
Louie Powell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bandicoot" wrote in
:

"jjs" wrote in message
...
"Shelley" wrote in message
news:SCxld.2762$h15.2138@trnddc07...

Just curious. why do you think it's as inconvenient to slip a roll
film holder under the ground glass, photograph, and remove the
holder as it

is
to
remove the ground glass frame, find a safe place to put it, insert
the roll
film holder, photograph, remove the roll film holder, retrieve the

ground
glass frame, and put the ground glass frame back in the camera.


Shelley, you left out a part: "slip and drop the ground glass and
then

drop
the roll film holder" "into the dirt", then "clean them", and of
course,

all
the cussing.



In the immortal words of Mark Twian, "profanity offers a form of relief
denied even to prayer".



  #38  
Old November 17th 04, 12:22 AM
Louie Powell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bandicoot" wrote in
:

"jjs" wrote in message
...
"Shelley" wrote in message
news:SCxld.2762$h15.2138@trnddc07...

Just curious. why do you think it's as inconvenient to slip a roll
film holder under the ground glass, photograph, and remove the
holder as it

is
to
remove the ground glass frame, find a safe place to put it, insert
the roll
film holder, photograph, remove the roll film holder, retrieve the

ground
glass frame, and put the ground glass frame back in the camera.


Shelley, you left out a part: "slip and drop the ground glass and
then

drop
the roll film holder" "into the dirt", then "clean them", and of
course,

all
the cussing.



In the immortal words of Mark Twian, "profanity offers a form of relief
denied even to prayer".



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Depth of Field Preview Question: Michael P Gabriel Digital Photography 6 June 25th 04 11:29 PM
Contrast Index Question: Newbie In The Trenches In The Darkroom 24 June 1st 04 01:14 AM
Stopping Down Enlarger Lens Focus Question Newbie SofaKing In The Darkroom 18 April 19th 04 12:03 AM
Newbie question: metering the GG MikeWhy Large Format Photography Equipment 4 February 2nd 04 03:55 AM
Newbie question: lenses MikeWhy Large Format Photography Equipment 13 February 1st 04 08:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.