If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Kirk Fry" wrote in message
om... So I've got $2,000 to play with. What is the hangup with a 2 lens kit? I've had to amend that amount somewhat. I'm now shooting for around $1500. Buy an old Calument CC410 (20 inch rail and built like main battle tanks and costs $150 and has all the movements) Not interested in a rail camera that has to be transported in a box the size of Davey Jone's locker, or broken down and reassembled... and 4 used lenses designed for what you want to do. Lenses: 150mm G-Claron f9 in shutter for $250 max, this is a macro lens (and enlarger lens) that can be used also as a main lenses at infinity and f22, That's exactly the kind of advice I was fishing for. Thanks. 300mm f9 M Nikkor, $500, 90mm f8 Schneider Super Angulon ($350) I'm hoping for something faster, like the f6.8 Rodenstock 90mm (or Calumet version of same). and maybe a 210mm f5.6 Schneider($300). Your prices are a bit lower than what I've been seeing on ebay. Get a shutter tester so you know what your actual speeds are (Calumet). Any lens built in the last 40 years that is in good shape will likely be way better than your technique. Then don't forget the spot meter, dark cloth, focusing loupe (very very important), good solid tripod, orange or red filters if you shoot B&W outside and film holders (none of these things are "optional"). After that the developing tanks and film scanner or enlarger. I have many of these things, and the dark cloth and film holders come with the Shen-Hao. After you have made a couple of hundred pictures with this equipment you will either give up or know what you really want and be able to sell what does not work for you for what you paid for it, and get what you want. If you buy brand new super duper APO (and it is not really apo) stuff you are going to take a real bath if you have sell it. I've noticed that. They go for $1200 new and $400 used. Ouch! Good luck and have fun. kirk -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
"Kirk Fry" wrote in message
om... So I've got $2,000 to play with. What is the hangup with a 2 lens kit? I've had to amend that amount somewhat. I'm now shooting for around $1500. Buy an old Calument CC410 (20 inch rail and built like main battle tanks and costs $150 and has all the movements) Not interested in a rail camera that has to be transported in a box the size of Davey Jone's locker, or broken down and reassembled... and 4 used lenses designed for what you want to do. Lenses: 150mm G-Claron f9 in shutter for $250 max, this is a macro lens (and enlarger lens) that can be used also as a main lenses at infinity and f22, That's exactly the kind of advice I was fishing for. Thanks. 300mm f9 M Nikkor, $500, 90mm f8 Schneider Super Angulon ($350) I'm hoping for something faster, like the f6.8 Rodenstock 90mm (or Calumet version of same). and maybe a 210mm f5.6 Schneider($300). Your prices are a bit lower than what I've been seeing on ebay. Get a shutter tester so you know what your actual speeds are (Calumet). Any lens built in the last 40 years that is in good shape will likely be way better than your technique. Then don't forget the spot meter, dark cloth, focusing loupe (very very important), good solid tripod, orange or red filters if you shoot B&W outside and film holders (none of these things are "optional"). After that the developing tanks and film scanner or enlarger. I have many of these things, and the dark cloth and film holders come with the Shen-Hao. After you have made a couple of hundred pictures with this equipment you will either give up or know what you really want and be able to sell what does not work for you for what you paid for it, and get what you want. If you buy brand new super duper APO (and it is not really apo) stuff you are going to take a real bath if you have sell it. I've noticed that. They go for $1200 new and $400 used. Ouch! Good luck and have fun. kirk -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Clara wrote (in part):
300mm f9 M Nikkor, $500, 90mm f8 Schneider Super Angulon ($350) I'm hoping for something faster, like the f6.8 Rodenstock 90mm (or Calumet version of same). I have both of those lenses. It turns out that they are both bright enough to focus in the field. Unless you wish to reduce your depth of field by opening them up more than f/9, you will probably find them bright enough for 4x5. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 17:10:00 up 28 days, 20:04, 3 users, load average: 4.39, 4.29, 4.31 |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Clara wrote (in part):
300mm f9 M Nikkor, $500, 90mm f8 Schneider Super Angulon ($350) I'm hoping for something faster, like the f6.8 Rodenstock 90mm (or Calumet version of same). I have both of those lenses. It turns out that they are both bright enough to focus in the field. Unless you wish to reduce your depth of field by opening them up more than f/9, you will probably find them bright enough for 4x5. -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 17:10:00 up 28 days, 20:04, 3 users, load average: 4.39, 4.29, 4.31 |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Matt,
At $1500 you will have to start with a couple of lenses to keep the price down. The Calumet was the only quality camera out there I have any experience with that keeps the price down. Yes it is not beautiful and it is heavy, but it gets the job done for very little money. I would like to thank Mr. Beyer for putting me straight on the rail lengths. The problems with the CC40? numbers is that they are not actually printed on the cameras. The black ones were the last ones made and thus are only ~25 years old as opposed to the gray ones that might be ~30-40 years old. The same model was designed and sold by Kodak ~50 years ago. So there is another problem, to use a 90 mm on the longer rail cameras is hard. You have to use a recessed lens board. It works but you don't have a bunch of movement. I have no idea what happens with the short rail ones (never used one). Another cheap altertenative in cameras is a Tachihara or Calumet Field something (same camera). This is a fold up wooden field camera. It is light and built just the opposite to the Calumet, more like the Wright Flyer. It will not work for a 300mm lens (12 inch bellows draw) unless you have the extension back which was made for it some years back and is very rare (for good reason). It is also not wonderful for 90 mm lenses although it will work straight on. To stabilize this one I put some velcro on top of the front and back standards and have a short stick that also has velcro on it and I stick that down on the standards after I have everything set up to stabilize the standards. Mabye the newer ones are better but mine is floppy. This one will travel easily and is very light weight. (I bought mine for $150 as the front focusing knob was broken off and I got parts from Calumet to fix it. ~$350-600 on ebay.) My main camera is a Basic B ARAC (~30 years old). Wonderful for the field. Just set it up on your tripod when you get off the airplane and off you go. $500 or so used. Just because it has a rail does not mean you can't use it in the field. With a bag bellows it works great with wide angle lenses. There is a whole world of old ARCA stuff out there. The old stuff does not in general work with the new stuff (F-line). The problem is finding what part you need. Waste some time looking for these things on Ebay. Have fun. "Matt Clara" wrote in message . .. "Kirk Fry" wrote in message om... So I've got $2,000 to play with. What is the hangup with a 2 lens kit? I've had to amend that amount somewhat. I'm now shooting for around $1500. Buy an old Calument CC410 (20 inch rail and built like main battle tanks and costs $150 and has all the movements) Not interested in a rail camera that has to be transported in a box the size of Davey Jone's locker, or broken down and reassembled... and 4 used lenses designed for what you want to do. Lenses: 150mm G-Claron f9 in shutter for $250 max, this is a macro lens (and enlarger lens) that can be used also as a main lenses at infinity and f22, That's exactly the kind of advice I was fishing for. Thanks. 300mm f9 M Nikkor, $500, 90mm f8 Schneider Super Angulon ($350) I'm hoping for something faster, like the f6.8 Rodenstock 90mm (or Calumet version of same). and maybe a 210mm f5.6 Schneider($300). Your prices are a bit lower than what I've been seeing on ebay. Get a shutter tester so you know what your actual speeds are (Calumet). Any lens built in the last 40 years that is in good shape will likely be way better than your technique. Then don't forget the spot meter, dark cloth, focusing loupe (very very important), good solid tripod, orange or red filters if you shoot B&W outside and film holders (none of these things are "optional"). After that the developing tanks and film scanner or enlarger. I have many of these things, and the dark cloth and film holders come with the Shen-Hao. After you have made a couple of hundred pictures with this equipment you will either give up or know what you really want and be able to sell what does not work for you for what you paid for it, and get what you want. If you buy brand new super duper APO (and it is not really apo) stuff you are going to take a real bath if you have sell it. I've noticed that. They go for $1200 new and $400 used. Ouch! Good luck and have fun. kirk |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Matt,
At $1500 you will have to start with a couple of lenses to keep the price down. The Calumet was the only quality camera out there I have any experience with that keeps the price down. Yes it is not beautiful and it is heavy, but it gets the job done for very little money. I would like to thank Mr. Beyer for putting me straight on the rail lengths. The problems with the CC40? numbers is that they are not actually printed on the cameras. The black ones were the last ones made and thus are only ~25 years old as opposed to the gray ones that might be ~30-40 years old. The same model was designed and sold by Kodak ~50 years ago. So there is another problem, to use a 90 mm on the longer rail cameras is hard. You have to use a recessed lens board. It works but you don't have a bunch of movement. I have no idea what happens with the short rail ones (never used one). Another cheap altertenative in cameras is a Tachihara or Calumet Field something (same camera). This is a fold up wooden field camera. It is light and built just the opposite to the Calumet, more like the Wright Flyer. It will not work for a 300mm lens (12 inch bellows draw) unless you have the extension back which was made for it some years back and is very rare (for good reason). It is also not wonderful for 90 mm lenses although it will work straight on. To stabilize this one I put some velcro on top of the front and back standards and have a short stick that also has velcro on it and I stick that down on the standards after I have everything set up to stabilize the standards. Mabye the newer ones are better but mine is floppy. This one will travel easily and is very light weight. (I bought mine for $150 as the front focusing knob was broken off and I got parts from Calumet to fix it. ~$350-600 on ebay.) My main camera is a Basic B ARAC (~30 years old). Wonderful for the field. Just set it up on your tripod when you get off the airplane and off you go. $500 or so used. Just because it has a rail does not mean you can't use it in the field. With a bag bellows it works great with wide angle lenses. There is a whole world of old ARCA stuff out there. The old stuff does not in general work with the new stuff (F-line). The problem is finding what part you need. Waste some time looking for these things on Ebay. Have fun. "Matt Clara" wrote in message . .. "Kirk Fry" wrote in message om... So I've got $2,000 to play with. What is the hangup with a 2 lens kit? I've had to amend that amount somewhat. I'm now shooting for around $1500. Buy an old Calument CC410 (20 inch rail and built like main battle tanks and costs $150 and has all the movements) Not interested in a rail camera that has to be transported in a box the size of Davey Jone's locker, or broken down and reassembled... and 4 used lenses designed for what you want to do. Lenses: 150mm G-Claron f9 in shutter for $250 max, this is a macro lens (and enlarger lens) that can be used also as a main lenses at infinity and f22, That's exactly the kind of advice I was fishing for. Thanks. 300mm f9 M Nikkor, $500, 90mm f8 Schneider Super Angulon ($350) I'm hoping for something faster, like the f6.8 Rodenstock 90mm (or Calumet version of same). and maybe a 210mm f5.6 Schneider($300). Your prices are a bit lower than what I've been seeing on ebay. Get a shutter tester so you know what your actual speeds are (Calumet). Any lens built in the last 40 years that is in good shape will likely be way better than your technique. Then don't forget the spot meter, dark cloth, focusing loupe (very very important), good solid tripod, orange or red filters if you shoot B&W outside and film holders (none of these things are "optional"). After that the developing tanks and film scanner or enlarger. I have many of these things, and the dark cloth and film holders come with the Shen-Hao. After you have made a couple of hundred pictures with this equipment you will either give up or know what you really want and be able to sell what does not work for you for what you paid for it, and get what you want. If you buy brand new super duper APO (and it is not really apo) stuff you are going to take a real bath if you have sell it. I've noticed that. They go for $1200 new and $400 used. Ouch! Good luck and have fun. kirk |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Another cheap altertenative in cameras is a Tachihara or Calumet Field
something (same camera). This is a fold up wooden field camera. It is light and built just the opposite to the Calumet, more like the Wright Flyer. It will not work for a 300mm lens (12 inch bellows draw) unless you have the extension back which was made for it some years back and is very rare (for good reason). It is also not wonderful for 90 mm lenses although it will work straight on. There's a lot of misinformation crammed into a couple sentences with the above as it relates to any Tachihara made since the late 1980s and that has been properly cared for. It looks like he bought an old beat up Tachihara since he says he paid $150 for it and the focusing knob was broken off. That price is about half to a third of the usual going price for a used Tachihara in good condition. I bought mine new around 1996. My 300mm Nikkor M lens worked fine on it. The Tachihara's 13 inch bellows extension allowed me to focus to about 10-12 feet, plenty close for a 300mm lens for most purposes. My Fuji 400mm T also worked fine. Second, the Tachihara actually is wonderful for 90mm, I used a 90mm F5.6 Super Angulon on my Tachihara all the time and had plenty of room for movements. Maybe the bellows on his has become stiff with age or perhaps all that velcro and other stuff he's stuck on it are interfering with the movements. In any event, there's something wrong with his camera if he can only use a 90mm lens straight on. The Tachihara actually works with some room for movements with a 75mm lens and will go as short as a 65mm lens though I'm not sure about movements with that lens. I ended up not buying the 65mm I tested on the Tachihara so I didn't have a lot of experience with the lens but it did work on the camera. Finally, the Tachihara is a very nicely built camera, about the same quality as any other wood field camera that I've used except for the Ebony SVTe for which I paid about five times what I paid for the Tachihara. The "Calumet Field something" that he's groping for is the Calumet Woodfield. That camera was a Tachihara on which Calumet affixed a Calument decal and then charged a couple hundred dollars more for it. I don't think Calumet sells these any more. The Tachihara used to be a clear "best value for the money" among wood field cameras until the Shen Hao came along. Now there's something to be said for either of them as best value, the Shen Hao has a couple movements that the Tachihara doesn't have and also will take a bag bellows. OTOH, the Shen Hao weighs about two pounds more than the Tachihara. "Kirk Fry" wrote in message om... Matt, At $1500 you will have to start with a couple of lenses to keep the price down. The Calumet was the only quality camera out there I have any experience with that keeps the price down. Yes it is not beautiful and it is heavy, but it gets the job done for very little money. I would like to thank Mr. Beyer for putting me straight on the rail lengths. The problems with the CC40? numbers is that they are not actually printed on the cameras. The black ones were the last ones made and thus are only ~25 years old as opposed to the gray ones that might be ~30-40 years old. The same model was designed and sold by Kodak ~50 years ago. So there is another problem, to use a 90 mm on the longer rail cameras is hard. You have to use a recessed lens board. It works but you don't have a bunch of movement. I have no idea what happens with the short rail ones (never used one). Another cheap altertenative in cameras is a Tachihara or Calumet Field something (same camera). This is a fold up wooden field camera. It is light and built just the opposite to the Calumet, more like the Wright Flyer. It will not work for a 300mm lens (12 inch bellows draw) unless you have the extension back which was made for it some years back and is very rare (for good reason). It is also not wonderful for 90 mm lenses although it will work straight on. To stabilize this one I put some velcro on top of the front and back standards and have a short stick that also has velcro on it and I stick that down on the standards after I have everything set up to stabilize the standards. Mabye the newer ones are better but mine is floppy. This one will travel easily and is very light weight. (I bought mine for $150 as the front focusing knob was broken off and I got parts from Calumet to fix it. ~$350-600 on ebay.) My main camera is a Basic B ARAC (~30 years old). Wonderful for the field. Just set it up on your tripod when you get off the airplane and off you go. $500 or so used. Just because it has a rail does not mean you can't use it in the field. With a bag bellows it works great with wide angle lenses. There is a whole world of old ARCA stuff out there. The old stuff does not in general work with the new stuff (F-line). The problem is finding what part you need. Waste some time looking for these things on Ebay. Have fun. "Matt Clara" wrote in message . .. "Kirk Fry" wrote in message om... So I've got $2,000 to play with. What is the hangup with a 2 lens kit? I've had to amend that amount somewhat. I'm now shooting for around $1500. Buy an old Calument CC410 (20 inch rail and built like main battle tanks and costs $150 and has all the movements) Not interested in a rail camera that has to be transported in a box the size of Davey Jone's locker, or broken down and reassembled... and 4 used lenses designed for what you want to do. Lenses: 150mm G-Claron f9 in shutter for $250 max, this is a macro lens (and enlarger lens) that can be used also as a main lenses at infinity and f22, That's exactly the kind of advice I was fishing for. Thanks. 300mm f9 M Nikkor, $500, 90mm f8 Schneider Super Angulon ($350) I'm hoping for something faster, like the f6.8 Rodenstock 90mm (or Calumet version of same). and maybe a 210mm f5.6 Schneider($300). Your prices are a bit lower than what I've been seeing on ebay. Get a shutter tester so you know what your actual speeds are (Calumet). Any lens built in the last 40 years that is in good shape will likely be way better than your technique. Then don't forget the spot meter, dark cloth, focusing loupe (very very important), good solid tripod, orange or red filters if you shoot B&W outside and film holders (none of these things are "optional"). After that the developing tanks and film scanner or enlarger. I have many of these things, and the dark cloth and film holders come with the Shen-Hao. After you have made a couple of hundred pictures with this equipment you will either give up or know what you really want and be able to sell what does not work for you for what you paid for it, and get what you want. If you buy brand new super duper APO (and it is not really apo) stuff you are going to take a real bath if you have sell it. I've noticed that. They go for $1200 new and $400 used. Ouch! Good luck and have fun. kirk |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Another cheap altertenative in cameras is a Tachihara or Calumet Field
something (same camera). This is a fold up wooden field camera. It is light and built just the opposite to the Calumet, more like the Wright Flyer. It will not work for a 300mm lens (12 inch bellows draw) unless you have the extension back which was made for it some years back and is very rare (for good reason). It is also not wonderful for 90 mm lenses although it will work straight on. There's a lot of misinformation crammed into a couple sentences with the above as it relates to any Tachihara made since the late 1980s and that has been properly cared for. It looks like he bought an old beat up Tachihara since he says he paid $150 for it and the focusing knob was broken off. That price is about half to a third of the usual going price for a used Tachihara in good condition. I bought mine new around 1996. My 300mm Nikkor M lens worked fine on it. The Tachihara's 13 inch bellows extension allowed me to focus to about 10-12 feet, plenty close for a 300mm lens for most purposes. My Fuji 400mm T also worked fine. Second, the Tachihara actually is wonderful for 90mm, I used a 90mm F5.6 Super Angulon on my Tachihara all the time and had plenty of room for movements. Maybe the bellows on his has become stiff with age or perhaps all that velcro and other stuff he's stuck on it are interfering with the movements. In any event, there's something wrong with his camera if he can only use a 90mm lens straight on. The Tachihara actually works with some room for movements with a 75mm lens and will go as short as a 65mm lens though I'm not sure about movements with that lens. I ended up not buying the 65mm I tested on the Tachihara so I didn't have a lot of experience with the lens but it did work on the camera. Finally, the Tachihara is a very nicely built camera, about the same quality as any other wood field camera that I've used except for the Ebony SVTe for which I paid about five times what I paid for the Tachihara. The "Calumet Field something" that he's groping for is the Calumet Woodfield. That camera was a Tachihara on which Calumet affixed a Calument decal and then charged a couple hundred dollars more for it. I don't think Calumet sells these any more. The Tachihara used to be a clear "best value for the money" among wood field cameras until the Shen Hao came along. Now there's something to be said for either of them as best value, the Shen Hao has a couple movements that the Tachihara doesn't have and also will take a bag bellows. OTOH, the Shen Hao weighs about two pounds more than the Tachihara. "Kirk Fry" wrote in message om... Matt, At $1500 you will have to start with a couple of lenses to keep the price down. The Calumet was the only quality camera out there I have any experience with that keeps the price down. Yes it is not beautiful and it is heavy, but it gets the job done for very little money. I would like to thank Mr. Beyer for putting me straight on the rail lengths. The problems with the CC40? numbers is that they are not actually printed on the cameras. The black ones were the last ones made and thus are only ~25 years old as opposed to the gray ones that might be ~30-40 years old. The same model was designed and sold by Kodak ~50 years ago. So there is another problem, to use a 90 mm on the longer rail cameras is hard. You have to use a recessed lens board. It works but you don't have a bunch of movement. I have no idea what happens with the short rail ones (never used one). Another cheap altertenative in cameras is a Tachihara or Calumet Field something (same camera). This is a fold up wooden field camera. It is light and built just the opposite to the Calumet, more like the Wright Flyer. It will not work for a 300mm lens (12 inch bellows draw) unless you have the extension back which was made for it some years back and is very rare (for good reason). It is also not wonderful for 90 mm lenses although it will work straight on. To stabilize this one I put some velcro on top of the front and back standards and have a short stick that also has velcro on it and I stick that down on the standards after I have everything set up to stabilize the standards. Mabye the newer ones are better but mine is floppy. This one will travel easily and is very light weight. (I bought mine for $150 as the front focusing knob was broken off and I got parts from Calumet to fix it. ~$350-600 on ebay.) My main camera is a Basic B ARAC (~30 years old). Wonderful for the field. Just set it up on your tripod when you get off the airplane and off you go. $500 or so used. Just because it has a rail does not mean you can't use it in the field. With a bag bellows it works great with wide angle lenses. There is a whole world of old ARCA stuff out there. The old stuff does not in general work with the new stuff (F-line). The problem is finding what part you need. Waste some time looking for these things on Ebay. Have fun. "Matt Clara" wrote in message . .. "Kirk Fry" wrote in message om... So I've got $2,000 to play with. What is the hangup with a 2 lens kit? I've had to amend that amount somewhat. I'm now shooting for around $1500. Buy an old Calument CC410 (20 inch rail and built like main battle tanks and costs $150 and has all the movements) Not interested in a rail camera that has to be transported in a box the size of Davey Jone's locker, or broken down and reassembled... and 4 used lenses designed for what you want to do. Lenses: 150mm G-Claron f9 in shutter for $250 max, this is a macro lens (and enlarger lens) that can be used also as a main lenses at infinity and f22, That's exactly the kind of advice I was fishing for. Thanks. 300mm f9 M Nikkor, $500, 90mm f8 Schneider Super Angulon ($350) I'm hoping for something faster, like the f6.8 Rodenstock 90mm (or Calumet version of same). and maybe a 210mm f5.6 Schneider($300). Your prices are a bit lower than what I've been seeing on ebay. Get a shutter tester so you know what your actual speeds are (Calumet). Any lens built in the last 40 years that is in good shape will likely be way better than your technique. Then don't forget the spot meter, dark cloth, focusing loupe (very very important), good solid tripod, orange or red filters if you shoot B&W outside and film holders (none of these things are "optional"). After that the developing tanks and film scanner or enlarger. I have many of these things, and the dark cloth and film holders come with the Shen-Hao. After you have made a couple of hundred pictures with this equipment you will either give up or know what you really want and be able to sell what does not work for you for what you paid for it, and get what you want. If you buy brand new super duper APO (and it is not really apo) stuff you are going to take a real bath if you have sell it. I've noticed that. They go for $1200 new and $400 used. Ouch! Good luck and have fun. kirk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rolleiflex Automat weird problem | Dmitry Poplavsky | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 25 | December 9th 04 10:01 AM |
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs | KM | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 724 | December 7th 04 09:58 AM |
Caltar lens bubbles | Tom Phillips | Large Format Photography Equipment | 4 | October 2nd 04 10:16 PM |
Formula for pre-focusing | Steve Yeatts | Large Format Photography Equipment | 9 | June 22nd 04 02:55 AM |
Old Nikkor lens | Peter K. | Other Photographic Equipment | 9 | October 31st 03 04:02 AM |