A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sony Carl Zeiss 135 f/1.7 -- too sharp?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 14th 07, 07:40 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default Sony Carl Zeiss 135 f/1.7 -- too sharp?



Wide open (f/1.7, 1/800, open shade, WB@7500K, from RAW, Maxxum 7D, ISO 100)

Unsharp maks... note the staircase in the middle, back petal. This is
apparent in the RAW file as well. See last linked image [W/O sharpening])

Downsampled
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...ICT5234SML.jpg
201K

Full size
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...rsPICT5234.jpg
761K

Section at full size
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...CT5234Sect.jpg
282K

and that's on a 6 Mpix camera. If Sony does a 12+ Mpix camera ...

(Note: focusing this thing is a challenge).

Is this lens *too* sharp for a 6 mpix?
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...4Staircase.jpg

Cheers,
Alan.


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
  #2  
Old July 14th 07, 08:53 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
JimKramer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 762
Default Sony Carl Zeiss 135 f/1.7 -- too sharp?

On Jul 14, 2:40 pm, Alan Browne
wrote:
Wide open (f/1.7, 1/800, open shade, WB@7500K, from RAW, Maxxum 7D, ISO 100)

Unsharp maks... note the staircase in the middle, back petal. This is
apparent in the RAW file as well. See last linked image [W/O sharpening])

Downsampledhttp://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ135f1.7/OrangeFlowersPICT5234SML.jpg
201K

Full sizehttp://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ135f1.7/OrangeFlowersPICT5234.jpg
761K

Section at full sizehttp://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ135f1.7/OrangeFlowersPICT5234Sect...
282K

and that's on a 6 Mpix camera. If Sony does a 12+ Mpix camera ...

(Note: focusing this thing is a challenge).

Is this lens *too* sharp for a 6 mpix?http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...rsPICT5234Stai...

Cheers,
Alan.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource:http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems:http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz:http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.


The issue appears to be the angle (45 degrees) not the sharpness of
the lens. Get out some sharp edges and shoot them at various angles to
confirm.

JIm

  #3  
Old July 14th 07, 11:17 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default Sony Carl Zeiss 135 f/1.7 -- too sharp?

JimKramer wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:40 pm, Alan Browne
wrote:
Wide open (f/1.7, 1/800, open shade, WB@7500K, from RAW, Maxxum 7D, ISO 100)

Unsharp maks... note the staircase in the middle, back petal. This is
apparent in the RAW file as well. See last linked image [W/O sharpening])

Downsampledhttp://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ135f1.7/OrangeFlowersPICT5234SML.jpg
201K

Full sizehttp://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ135f1.7/OrangeFlowersPICT5234.jpg
761K

Section at full sizehttp://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ135f1.7/OrangeFlowersPICT5234Sect...
282K

and that's on a 6 Mpix camera. If Sony does a 12+ Mpix camera ...

(Note: focusing this thing is a challenge).

Is this lens *too* sharp for a 6 mpix?http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...rsPICT5234Stai...

The issue appears to be the angle (45 degrees) not the sharpness of
the lens. Get out some sharp edges and shoot them at various angles to
confirm.


I've never seen this with another lens, including the razor sharp 100
f/2.8 ...

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
  #4  
Old July 15th 07, 04:21 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default Sony Carl Zeiss 135 f/1.8 -- too sharp?

Alan Browne wrote:



Didn't notice that the RAW import sharpening was on; I usually have it
at 0 to save sharpening for a last step before saving/printing.

So there is no -over sharp- issue ... how could there be?

Cheers,
Alan.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
  #5  
Old July 16th 07, 05:35 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Paul Furman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,367
Default Sony Carl Zeiss 135 f/1.7 -- too sharp?

Links don't work...

Alan Browne wrote:



Wide open (f/1.7, 1/800, open shade, WB@7500K, from RAW, Maxxum 7D, ISO
100)

Unsharp maks... note the staircase in the middle, back petal. This is
apparent in the RAW file as well. See last linked image [W/O sharpening])

Downsampled
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...ICT5234SML.jpg
201K

Full size
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...rsPICT5234.jpg
761K

Section at full size
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...CT5234Sect.jpg
282K

and that's on a 6 Mpix camera. If Sony does a 12+ Mpix camera ...

(Note: focusing this thing is a challenge).

Is this lens *too* sharp for a 6 mpix?
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...4Staircase.jpg


Cheers,
Alan.




--
Paul Furman Photography
http://www.edgehill.net/1
Bay Natives Nursery
http://www.baynatives.com
  #6  
Old July 16th 07, 06:33 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default Sony Carl Zeiss 135 f/1.7 -- too sharp?

Paul Furman wrote:
Links don't work...


Various reasons, anyway problem fixed ... sharpening in CS3 RAW import.
Turn it to "0" and the problem is solved. Image is this one:

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?p...195464&size=lg (which is
about 35% of the original shot).

http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?p...198220&size=lg is a nicer
photo...



Alan Browne wrote:



Wide open (f/1.7, 1/800, open shade, WB@7500K, from RAW, Maxxum 7D,
ISO 100)

Unsharp maks... note the staircase in the middle, back petal. This is
apparent in the RAW file as well. See last linked image [W/O
sharpening])

Downsampled
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...ICT5234SML.jpg
201K

Full size
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...rsPICT5234.jpg
761K

Section at full size
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...CT5234Sect.jpg
282K

and that's on a 6 Mpix camera. If Sony does a 12+ Mpix camera ...

(Note: focusing this thing is a challenge).

Is this lens *too* sharp for a 6 mpix?
http://www.aliasimages.com/images/CZ...4Staircase.jpg


Cheers,
Alan.






--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sony Carl Zeiss 135mm f/1.7 -- too sharp for the Maxxum 7D Alan Browne Digital Photography 6 July 15th 07 07:46 PM
Carl Zeiss for Sony Alpha/Minolta Maxxum 135mm f/1.8 Alan Browne 35mm Photo Equipment 5 July 8th 07 02:25 PM
Telecentric; was Carl Zeiss Nicholas O. Lindan Large Format Photography Equipment 0 April 3rd 06 01:19 PM
Carl Zeiss Flektogon Thi Tran 35mm Photo Equipment 0 June 28th 04 03:05 PM
FS: Contax Carl Zeiss 50/1.4 T* Klyment Tan 35mm Equipment for Sale 0 June 9th 04 10:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.