If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2531
|
|||
|
|||
"Mxsmanic" wrote: Dwight Stewart writes: Why would you consider the National Institute on Drug Abuse, managed by Democrats under President Clinton and now by Republicans under President Bush, with the same conclusions under both parties, to be anything other than an independent site? The name alone seems to reveal a certain bias. Why? The agency exists to address the specific issue of drug abuse. Drug _use_ is addressed by the FDA. Stewart |
#2532
|
|||
|
|||
On 24 Apr 2005 14:47:15 GMT, George Kerby wrote:
GIVE IT UP, guys! There are BETTER things to do... Good grief, no. Let them continue. The more they type the less likely they'll be to wander into a park with their cameras and find an inappropriate subject. It is a pretty useless thread, full of sound and fury and all the rest that that signifies. |
#2533
|
|||
|
|||
ASAAR wrote:
On 24 Apr 2005 14:47:15 GMT, George Kerby wrote: GIVE IT UP, guys! There are BETTER things to do... Good grief, no. Let them continue. The more they type the less likely they'll be to wander into a park with their cameras and find an inappropriate subject. It is a pretty useless thread, full of sound and fury and all the rest that that signifies. I gave it up when nothing new was being contributed. Let it die, Bones. -- Ron Hunter |
#2534
|
|||
|
|||
ASAAR wrote:
On 24 Apr 2005 14:47:15 GMT, George Kerby wrote: GIVE IT UP, guys! There are BETTER things to do... Good grief, no. Let them continue. The more they type the less likely they'll be to wander into a park with their cameras and find an inappropriate subject. It is a pretty useless thread, full of sound and fury and all the rest that that signifies. I gave it up when nothing new was being contributed. Let it die, Bones. -- Ron Hunter |
#2535
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 05:25:51 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote: wrote: How goddamn dare you accuse me in a public forum of being a drug user, you arrogant jerkoff? I am completely in favor of legalization, but have never in my entire life used any illegal drugs. I think you protest just a little too much. TS. You're also very quick to assume the title of drug user when nothing was said to pin that directly on you. As I said earlier, most people in this country seldom discuss drugs. What planet is your country on? You cqn hardly turn on the TV or go to the local supermarket without hearing the discussion. Of those who do, most don't see legalization as an option worthy of consideration. In your tiny town maybe. Come on out to the west coast and hear reality. Therefore, when one sees someone fanatically Your simple-minded characterization. arguing in favor of legalization, not just discussing it in passing, it is certainly reasonable to wonder if that person has personal motivations for doing so - motivations beyond just politics or taxes. Like hell it's reasonable. Unless you're the kind of narrow-minded jerk (which you have shown yourself to be) who has to mpute criminal motives to those who don't agree with his pontifical generalizations, gleaned from governmeb=nt pamphlets. Stewart |
#2536
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:35:13 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote: "Jer" wrote: Dwight has already been brainwashed into believing the government is here to save his silly ass. Most of us know better. And you believe what, Jer? That the government is here to harm you? That a government elected by the people should be disbanded because it prevents you from doing whatever you want? Or do you just prefer a government ran by Jer's rules alone? What kind of pisass logic teacher taught you that anything not A must therefore be Z? We have lots of other choices of letters. Stewart |
#2537
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:35:13 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote: "Jer" wrote: Dwight has already been brainwashed into believing the government is here to save his silly ass. Most of us know better. And you believe what, Jer? That the government is here to harm you? That a government elected by the people should be disbanded because it prevents you from doing whatever you want? Or do you just prefer a government ran by Jer's rules alone? What kind of pisass logic teacher taught you that anything not A must therefore be Z? We have lots of other choices of letters. Stewart |
#2538
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:46:30 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote: "Steve" wrote: (snip) Nobody expects you to know the intricacies of alcohol laws in different jurisdictions. They're probably complicated enough in your own state and county. That you didn't even know that there are dry counties anywhere is the issue. If you were unaware of something about our most widely abused drug that is so widely known, why should your unsubstantiated claims about other drugs be accepted? I don't know the specific drug laws in every town, county, or state either, nor would I likely waste time researching that since it is essentually a local issue. After all, that is not really germane to the issue being discussed here - the general question of whether illegal drugs should be illegal. Don't you get dizzy living out there in the Land of Circular Arguments. Stewart |
#2539
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 06:42:50 GMT, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote: "Steve" wrote: Dwight Stewart wrote: Do you really equate oral sex and illegal drug use? Of course I do. I'm sure you do. However, since most people see those as two entirely different things, I doubt it is true for most reading your comments. (snip) You offered an argument based on the similarity of the punishment for two crimes, and then used it to make yet another bizarre leapt indicating your inability to see how different the crimes themselves are. (snip) Now you're trying to twist my words. Beyond the context given (arrests ruin lives and are a disappointment to families), I said nothing about "the similarity of the punishment for two crimes." Therefore, I didn't use that to make a leap to anything. (snip) You've taken many opportunities to make leaps of ignorance by going beyond the scope of any given analogy and coming up with bizarre extrapolations. In this case (snip) The only bizarre extrapolations here seem to be coming from your own mind, not anything else. Have you not noticed that you seem to be the only person here coming to these strange conclusions about the things I've said. Most others, even those who disagree with my views, seem to have no problem comprehending exactly what I'm saying. Bullcrap -- most of wht you write is barely above the level of gibberish. In reality, I suspect you also understand very well what I'm saying, but just don't like what is said. Stewart |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best cat breed with young children at home | -L. | Digital Photography | 2 | February 11th 05 12:49 AM |
Best cat breed with young children at home | -L. | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | February 7th 05 07:30 AM |
Best large bird with young children at home | Ron Hudson | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | February 4th 05 08:10 PM |
Books on Composition, developing an "Eye"? | William J. Slater | General Photography Techniques | 9 | April 7th 04 04:22 PM |
Photographing children | Steven Church | Photographing People | 13 | October 21st 03 10:55 AM |