If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR's cutting-edge capabilities are nice, but no longer needed?
On 5/19/2015 12:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On May 19, 2015, George Kerby wrote (in ): On 5/17/15 4:25 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: Neeeeedddd. Gotta havvvvee!! For what? Bragging rights? For their "great" photographic efforts? So they can watch a pro with lesser gear run rings around them? Goes with the old saying about an infinite number of moneys at typewriters can eventually produce a novel of sorts... Yup! Throw enough money at a typewriter, and you will without doubt, get a great novel. Think Kim Kardashian. Tell enough people she has talent, and some will believe it. -- PeterN |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR's cutting-edge capabilities are nice, but no longer needed?
On May 19, 2015, PeterN wrote
(in ): On 5/19/2015 12:25 PM, Savageduck wrote: On May 19, 2015, George Kerby wrote (in ): On 5/17/15 4:25 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: Neeeeedddd. Gotta havvvvee!! For what? Bragging rights? For their "great" photographic efforts? So they can watch a pro with lesser gear run rings around them? Goes with the old saying about an infinite number of moneys at typewriters can eventually produce a novel of sorts... Yup! Throw enough money at a typewriter, and you will without doubt, get a great novel. Think Kim Kardashian. Tell enough people she has talent, and some will believe it. The one in that family who has talent is the mother. She has the talent to market the whole klan of “K” klones. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR's cutting-edge capabilities are nice, but no longer needed?
On 5/19/15 PDT 9:53 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On May 19, 2015, PeterN wrote (in ): On 5/19/2015 12:25 PM, Savageduck wrote: On May 19, 2015, George Kerby wrote (in ): On 5/17/15 4:25 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: Neeeeedddd. Gotta havvvvee!! For what? Bragging rights? For their "great" photographic efforts? So they can watch a pro with lesser gear run rings around them? Goes with the old saying about an infinite number of moneys at typewriters can eventually produce a novel of sorts... Yup! Throw enough money at a typewriter, and you will without doubt, get a great novel. Think Kim Kardashian. Tell enough people she has talent, and some will believe it. The one in that family who has talent is the mother. She has the talent to market the whole klan of “K” klones. Bingo! Although I am beginning to think invoking of any of those people is almost like referring to the dominant political party in Germany in the 30's and part of the 40's. ...... EOT! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR's cutting-edge capabilities are nice, but no longer needed?
On 5/20/2015 8:58 AM, Whisky-dave wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 16:56:02 UTC+1, George Kerby wrote: On 5/17/15 4:25 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Sunday, 17 May 2015 09:26:00 UTC-4, Sandman wrote: In article , RichA wrote: RichA: You can produce a decent shot of almost anything with lesser cameras today. So who really needs "the best?" Sandman: Professional and prosumer photographers. You're welcome. "Prosumers need the best...HA HA HA HA!" WANT, yes; NEED? NO! Laugh it up, fuzzball. Doesn't change the answer. Professional and prosumer photographers need DSLR. -- Sandman Neeeeedddd. Gotta havvvvee!! For what? Bragging rights? For their "great" photographic efforts? So they can watch a pro with lesser gear run rings around them? Goes with the old saying about an infinite number of moneys at typewriters can eventually produce a novel of sorts... Think you meant monkeys, but tehy found that isn;t actually true as: 1/ Monkey would just sit there most likely wanking themselves off or destroying the typewriter. for the above reason(s) you'd need an infinite number of typewriters too, and wet wipes. Also it'd take infinite time to check/join the resulting text together, so would need an infinte number of people over an infinite time. And how many monkeys would it take to type your above paragraph in one day. (lets use a typing rate of sisty five words per minute. -- PeterN |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR's cutting-edge capabilities are nice, but no longer needed?
On 5/20/2015 9:45 AM, PeterN wrote:
On 5/20/2015 8:58 AM, Whisky-dave wrote: On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 16:56:02 UTC+1, George Kerby wrote: On 5/17/15 4:25 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Sunday, 17 May 2015 09:26:00 UTC-4, Sandman wrote: In article , RichA wrote: RichA: You can produce a decent shot of almost anything with lesser cameras today. So who really needs "the best?" Sandman: Professional and prosumer photographers. You're welcome. "Prosumers need the best...HA HA HA HA!" WANT, yes; NEED? NO! Laugh it up, fuzzball. Doesn't change the answer. Professional and prosumer photographers need DSLR. -- Sandman Neeeeedddd. Gotta havvvvee!! For what? Bragging rights? For their "great" photographic efforts? So they can watch a pro with lesser gear run rings around them? Goes with the old saying about an infinite number of moneys at typewriters can eventually produce a novel of sorts... Think you meant monkeys, but tehy found that isn;t actually true as: 1/ Monkey would just sit there most likely wanking themselves off or destroying the typewriter. for the above reason(s) you'd need an infinite number of typewriters too, and wet wipes. Also it'd take infinite time to check/join the resulting text together, so would need an infinte number of people over an infinite time. And how many monkeys would it take to type your above paragraph in one day. (lets use a typing rate of sisty five words per minute. Shouldn't take much time at all ...after those 10,000 hours of practice. 8-) == L... RC -- |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR's cutting-edge capabilities are nice, but no longer needed?
On 5/20/15 PDT 6:45 AM, PeterN wrote:
And how many monkeys would it take to type your above paragraph in one day. (lets use a typing rate of sisty five words per minute. An infinite number of monkeys would produce all the great works and all the gibberish in short order. But there's not an infinite number of anything. The universe may be expanding, but it's not infinite. Yes, a lot more than we can grasp, but not infinite! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR's cutting-edge capabilities are nice, but no longer needed?
On 5/21/2015 11:09 AM, John McWilliams wrote:
On 5/20/15 PDT 6:45 AM, PeterN wrote: And how many monkeys would it take to type your above paragraph in one day. (lets use a typing rate of sisty five words per minute. An infinite number of monkeys would produce all the great works and all the gibberish in short order. But there's not an infinite number of anything. The universe may be expanding, but it's not infinite. Yes, a lot more than we can grasp, but not infinite! Absolutely true. Thought I said something like that before. -- PeterN |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR's cutting-edge capabilities are nice, but no longer needed?
On May 21, 2015, PeterN wrote
(in ): On 5/21/2015 11:09 AM, John McWilliams wrote: On 5/20/15 PDT 6:45 AM, PeterN wrote: And how many monkeys would it take to type your above paragraph in one day. (lets use a typing rate of sisty five words per minute. An infinite number of monkeys would produce all the great works and all the gibberish in short order. But there's not an infinite number of anything. The universe may be expanding, but it's not infinite. Yes, a lot more than we can grasp, but not infinite! Absolutely true. Thought I said something like that before. …and if the monkeys were gibbons, then you would have gibbon grown, graphic, gibberish. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
DSLR's cutting-edge capabilities are nice, but no longer needed?
On 5/21/2015 1:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On May 21, 2015, PeterN wrote (in ): On 5/21/2015 11:09 AM, John McWilliams wrote: On 5/20/15 PDT 6:45 AM, PeterN wrote: And how many monkeys would it take to type your above paragraph in one day. (lets use a typing rate of sisty five words per minute. An infinite number of monkeys would produce all the great works and all the gibberish in short order. But there's not an infinite number of anything. The universe may be expanding, but it's not infinite. Yes, a lot more than we can grasp, but not infinite! Absolutely true. Thought I said something like that before. …and if the monkeys were gibbons, then you would have gibbon grown, graphic, gibberish. -- Your gibbon premise is wrong. Gibbons are apes, not monkeys. -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Notice there are no fully cutting edge cameras? | Ray Fischer | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | April 6th 10 03:47 AM |
Help needed with DSLR choice | Michael[_6_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 90 | March 23rd 10 01:08 AM |
Help needed with DSLR choice | Pete[_8_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | March 17th 10 11:00 AM |
DSLR won't meter longer than 30 seconds exposures. | Paul Furman | Digital SLR Cameras | 37 | February 7th 07 12:18 AM |