If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Olympus admits a try at "pro" would gut their 4/3rds system
RichA wrote:
I think that pretty much sums up what it would cost Olympus if they made a go for the professional market in meaningful way. The end of 4/3rds as a viable sensor format. But it also means the end of Olympus as a viable digital camera company. While it seems like it's far too late for them to try to catch up with Canon, Nikon, and Sony, the no-go scenario is even worse, they clearly can't build a viable business on 5% market share of 4:3. By stopping at 12 megapixels, they're essentially going into harvest mode. They'll make minimal investments in new products, with just minor tweaks for new models, and sell what they can. No big investments in sensors or development of a professional system. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Olympus admits a try at "pro" would gut their 4/3rds system
SMS wrote:
RichA wrote: I think that pretty much sums up what it would cost Olympus if they made a go for the professional market in meaningful way. The end of 4/3rds as a viable sensor format. But it also means the end of Olympus as a viable digital camera company. While it seems like it's far too late for them to try to catch up with Canon, Nikon, and Sony, the no-go scenario is even worse, they clearly can't build a viable business on 5% market share of 4:3. By stopping at 12 megapixels, they're essentially going into harvest mode. They'll make minimal investments in new products, with just minor tweaks for new models, and sell what they can. No big investments in sensors or development of a professional system. As Lee Iacocca used to say: "Lead, follow or get out of the way." Looks like they've picked the third option. They are no longer in the 35mm format world and can't grow much further within their 4/3 world. Honestly, they could make a strong push for the news photojournalist world (web, newspapers, magazines) as the more compact system (and perhaps esp. micro-4/3) should make that set of pj's happier and 12 Mpix is 3 - 4 times what is typically needed for web and newspapers and adequate (and then some) for most magazines. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Olympus admits a try at "pro" would gut their 4/3rds system
Alan Browne wrote:
Looks like they've picked the third option. They are no longer in the 35mm format world and can't grow much further within their 4/3 world. Hence the term "harvest mode." A lot of semiconductor companies have lines of products that they make no investment in in terms of updated products, or sales and marketing, but that provide steady revenue long after the initial investment has been paid back. You can sometimes build a pretty good business on these products, there just isn't any growth opportunity. Honestly, they could make a strong push for the news photojournalist world (web, newspapers, magazines) as the more compact system (and perhaps esp. micro-4/3) should make that set of pj's happier and 12 Mpix is 3 - 4 times what is typically needed for web and newspapers and adequate (and then some) for most magazines. They don't have the necessary lenses for many photo-journalist tasks. The wonderful thing about a full-line manufacturer is that you're not constantly being constrained by "well most users will rarely need such a lens (or other piece of equipment)." If you need an odd piece of equipment it's out there, either to buy or rent. There's no rationalization necessary. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Olympus admits a try at "pro" would gut their 4/3rds system
SMS wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: Looks like they've picked the third option. They are no longer in the 35mm format world and can't grow much further within their 4/3 world. Hence the term "harvest mode." A lot of semiconductor companies have lines of products that they make no investment in in terms of updated products, or sales and marketing, but that provide steady revenue long after the initial investment has been paid back. You can sometimes build a pretty good business on these products, there just isn't any growth opportunity. Honestly, they could make a strong push for the news photojournalist world (web, newspapers, magazines) as the more compact system (and perhaps esp. micro-4/3) should make that set of pj's happier and 12 Mpix is 3 - 4 times what is typically needed for web and newspapers and adequate (and then some) for most magazines. They don't have the necessary lenses for many photo-journalist tasks. The wonderful thing about a full-line manufacturer is that you're not constantly being constrained by "well most users will rarely need such a lens (or other piece of equipment)." If you need an odd piece of equipment it's out there, either to buy or rent. There's no rationalization necessary. Generally true, but newsies are not like that. A general assignment photographer for a large city daily can do pretty much all of his work with three holy trinity lenses. For 4/3 that would be the 7-14 f/4, 14-35 f/2 and the 35-100 f/2. Many combat PJs preferred systems like the Leica M (except the M8) series. Fixed focal length lenses, limited long lenses. Very reliable, compact, unobtrusive. I have little doubt that Oly can make such a system (reliable, compact) with micro 4/3. Whether they would get the pj's to buy in is another matter. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Olympus admits a try at "pro" would gut their 4/3rds system | Robert Coe | Digital Photography | 9 | March 26th 09 10:26 PM |
Canon admits "our old FILM WA's suck!" | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 19 | February 23rd 07 07:20 PM |
The myth of the "smaller" 4/3rds lens | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 38 | October 20th 06 03:44 AM |