If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Rita
Here's a comparison of a couple of shots from the Olympics, one taken with a
Canon and the other with a D3: http://timesonline.typepad.com/olymp...es---same.html The D3 shot is underexposed and has incorrect white balance! How can that be? :-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Rita
Böwser wrote:
Here's a comparison of a couple of shots from the Olympics, one taken with a Canon and the other with a D3: http://timesonline.typepad.com/olymp...es---same.html The D3 shot is underexposed and has incorrect white balance! How can that be? :-) How do you know one is taken with a Canon and the other a Nikon. Unless I overlooked it, the type of equipment used is not mentioned. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Rita
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:06:07 +0100, Dave wrote:
Böwser wrote: Here's a comparison of a couple of shots from the Olympics, one taken with a Canon and the other with a D3: http://timesonline.typepad.com/olymp...es---same.html The D3 shot is underexposed and has incorrect white balance! How can that be? :-) How do you know one is taken with a Canon and the other a Nikon. Unless I overlooked it, the type of equipment used is not mentioned. This is a daily column, and if you go to the previous day's column he explains this: http://timesonline.typepad.com/olymp...in-beijin.html "I would like to show two frames - one taken on a Canon camera - EOS1Dn MKIII with a 400mm f2.8 lens, the other on a Nikon D3 with a 400mm, also set at f2.8. Can you notice any difference in sharpness, definition, tonal range etc.?" -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Rita
Dave wrote:
Böwser wrote: Here's a comparison of a couple of shots from the Olympics, one taken with a Canon and the other with a D3: http://timesonline.typepad.com/olymp...es---same.html The D3 shot is underexposed and has incorrect white balance! How can that be? :-) How do you know one is taken with a Canon and the other a Nikon. Unless I overlooked it, the type of equipment used is not mentioned. The EXIF data is there on both photos. Russell |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Rita
"Rita Berkowitz" a écrit dans le message de m... Dave wrote: How do you know one is taken with a Canon and the other a Nikon. Unless I overlooked it, the type of equipment used is not mentioned. Simple, you look for the action shots that are in focus and you know a Nikon took it. looks you are wrong, again. The best shot is from the Canon and you know it, fat ass. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Rita
Böwser wrote:
Here's a comparison of a couple of shots from the Olympics, one taken with a Canon and the other with a D3: http://timesonline.typepad.com/olymp...es---same.html The D3 shot is underexposed and has incorrect white balance! How can that be? Who knows, a bunch of things are different, both manual exposure, the Canon has blown the red a bit which is fine in this case, the Nikon fills the histogram perfect. I never heard general complaints about Nikon WB vs Canon WB but yeah, the Nikon is off in this case with yellow skin tone. I'd expect a pro to use a custom WB for a staged event like this, especially when emailing jpegs immediately. 1D Mark III 10MP 1.3x crop 400mm f/2.8 1/1579 sec ISO 800 sRGB D3 12MP 1.0x crop 550mm f/4 1/1250 sec ISO 1600 PS thinks it's Adobe RGB, exif says 'uncalibrated -1' ? What the heck is the 550mm f/4 lens? I can't imagine how to get that. -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Rita
tony cooper wrote:
Nikon with a 400mm, also set at f2.8. Not what the exif says. -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Rita
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:31:42 -0700, Paul Furman
wrote: tony cooper wrote: Nikon with a 400mm, also set at f2.8. Not what the exif says. No, Tony Cooper *didn't* write that. I posted a link to the photographer's blog where *he* wrote that and copy/pasted what he wrote. That's what quotation marks indicate. If you want to argue with the photographer, then challenge what he wrote. Here's my post: This is a daily column, and if you go to the previous day's column he explains this: http://timesonline.typepad.com/olymp...in-beijin.html "I would like to show two frames - one taken on a Canon camera - EOS1Dn MKIII with a 400mm f2.8 lens, the other on a Nikon D3 with a 400mm, also set at f2.8. Can you notice any difference in sharpness, definition, tonal range etc.?" -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Rita
On 2008-08-15, B?wser wrote:
Here's a comparison of a couple of shots from the Olympics, one taken with a Canon and the other with a D3: http://timesonline.typepad.com/olymp...es---same.html The D3 shot is underexposed and has incorrect white balance! How can that be? Photographer's choice? I don't see any underexposure. The D3 shot looks a little green on my CRT, but OK on the laptop. When I first looked, before checking which was which and knowing the photographer's bias, I thought the D3 shot was his carefully selected Canon pic, just because of the hideous noise in the top half of the actual Canon shot. I would have thought a Canon shooter with the resources of Murdoch's empire behind him could have found a better Canon picture. -- savvo orig. invib. man |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ping Rita | John McWilliams | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | July 18th 08 12:55 AM |
Ping: Rita | Annika1980 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | February 27th 08 12:55 PM |
Ping: Rita | Jufi[_4_] | Digital Photography | 0 | February 26th 08 12:26 PM |
Ping: Rita | Jufi[_4_] | Digital Photography | 4 | February 26th 08 06:28 AM |
Ping: Rita | Kinon O'Cann | Digital Photography | 4 | December 7th 07 08:10 PM |