If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Metabones Speed Booster, a self-killing flop?
In article ,
RichA wrote: Apparently, this expensive ($400+ depending on converting what mount to what mount) device, designed to speed-up a lens by 1 f-stop (and in the process reducing the effective focal length by about 30%) causes the light rays to slant so much entering the sensor, that some of the light never makes it into the pixel, resulting in a net SLOWER aperture than the original lens has! In other words, it negated its own claimed function!!! However, on long focal length lenses this effect will be lessened because the light rays from the principal lens are more perpendicular to the sensor. The Speed Booster is a reverse-teleconverter really, that fits between the lens and the camera. That the device doesn't kill lens resolution and adds only a small amount of colour error is impressive, however. Unfortunately, the Holy Grail of blinding sub-f/1.00 f-ratio speed is still in the hands of $1000 Voigtlanders and $12,000 Leica lenses. There are knock offs by the buckets on the bay. $100-ish. Nikkor to Fuji are available... Again, YMMV. -- teleportation kills |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Metabones Speed Booster, a self-killing flop?
In article , android
wrote: In article , RichA wrote: Apparently, this expensive ($400+ depending on converting what mount to what mount) device, designed to speed-up a lens by 1 f-stop (and in the process reducing the effective focal length by about 30%) causes the light rays to slant so much entering the sensor, that some of the light never makes it into the pixel, resulting in a net SLOWER aperture than the original lens has! In other words, it negated its own claimed function!!! However, on long focal length lenses this effect will be lessened because the light rays from the principal lens are more perpendicular to the sensor. The Speed Booster is a reverse-teleconverter really, that fits between the lens and the camera. That the device doesn't kill lens resolution and adds only a small amount of colour error is impressive, however. Unfortunately, the Holy Grail of blinding sub-f/1.00 f-ratio speed is still in the hands of $1000 Voigtlanders and $12,000 Leica lenses. There are knock offs by the buckets on the bay. $100-ish. Nikkor to Fuji are available... Again, YMMV. I found one! Now, if I just could find a wired EF to EF-M at the same pricepoint... Then I just might... http://tinyurl.com/p2jn7zw -- teleportation kills |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Metabones Speed Booster, a self-killing flop?
RichA Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 00:49:39 UTC-4, android wrote: In article , RichA wrote: Apparently, this expensive ($400+ depending on converting what mount to what mount) device, designed to speed-up a lens by 1 f-stop (and in the process reducing the effective focal length by about 30%) causes the light rays to slant so much entering the sensor, that some of the light never makes it into the pixel, resulting in a net SLOWER aperture than the original lens has! In other words, it negated its own claimed function!!! However, on long focal length lenses this effect will be lessened because the light rays from the principal lens are more perpendicular to the sensor. The Speed Booster is a reverse-teleconverter really, that fits between the lens and the camera. That the device doesn't kill lens resolution and adds only a small amount of colour error is impressive, however. Unfortunately, the Holy Grail of blinding sub-f/1.00 f-ratio speed is still in the hands of $1000 Voigtlanders and $12,000 Leica lenses. There are knock offs by the buckets on the bay. $100-ish. Nikkor to Fuji are available... Again, YMMV. -- teleportation kills I saw a test between some of the knock-offs and the Metabones. The Metabones slaughtered them for sharpness, colour correction so for what it's worth, it's the best out there right now. As a lens focal length reducer, it's ok. If you mean the test that I've linked below then I think that you're exagerating... And other combos might yield other results and this test was made on one of those pitiful quarterframe sensors. http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53156458 -- Bats can't tell us apart! ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Biggest camera flop of last 2 years? | nospam | Digital Photography | 1 | September 17th 12 03:45 AM |
FS Canon EOS 10D with BG-ED3 booster (Uk) | Andy Torkington T-Tech Digital Media Ltd | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | February 14th 05 11:38 AM |
WTB: Lumedyne booster, modeling head, hsm, grids, speed rings, batteries, etc. - NYC only | hassy_user | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | November 10th 04 03:32 PM |
FS: Minolta Booster II kit | davidb | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 1 | November 8th 04 03:14 PM |
FS: Canon PB-E1 Pwr booster for EOS 1-1N | Gngphoto | Medium Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | July 27th 04 03:19 PM |