A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Metabones Speed Booster, a self-killing flop?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 3rd 15, 05:49 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default Metabones Speed Booster, a self-killing flop?

In article ,
RichA wrote:

Apparently, this expensive ($400+ depending on converting what mount to what
mount) device, designed to speed-up a lens by 1 f-stop (and in the process
reducing the effective focal length by about 30%) causes the light rays to
slant so much entering the sensor, that some of the light never makes it into
the pixel, resulting in a net SLOWER aperture than the original lens has! In
other words, it negated its own claimed function!!! However, on long focal
length lenses this effect will be lessened because the light rays from the
principal lens are more perpendicular to the sensor. The Speed Booster is a
reverse-teleconverter really, that fits between the lens and the camera.
That the device doesn't kill lens resolution and adds only a small amount of
colour error is impressive, however. Unfortunately, the Holy Grail of
blinding sub-f/1.00 f-ratio speed is still in the hands of $1000 Voigtlanders
and $12,000 Leica lenses.


There are knock offs by the buckets on the bay. $100-ish. Nikkor to Fuji
are available... Again, YMMV.
--
teleportation kills
  #2  
Old June 3rd 15, 06:48 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default Metabones Speed Booster, a self-killing flop?

In article , android
wrote:

In article ,
RichA wrote:

Apparently, this expensive ($400+ depending on converting what mount to
what
mount) device, designed to speed-up a lens by 1 f-stop (and in the process
reducing the effective focal length by about 30%) causes the light rays to
slant so much entering the sensor, that some of the light never makes it
into
the pixel, resulting in a net SLOWER aperture than the original lens has!
In
other words, it negated its own claimed function!!! However, on long focal
length lenses this effect will be lessened because the light rays from the
principal lens are more perpendicular to the sensor. The Speed Booster is
a
reverse-teleconverter really, that fits between the lens and the camera.
That the device doesn't kill lens resolution and adds only a small amount
of
colour error is impressive, however. Unfortunately, the Holy Grail of
blinding sub-f/1.00 f-ratio speed is still in the hands of $1000
Voigtlanders
and $12,000 Leica lenses.


There are knock offs by the buckets on the bay. $100-ish. Nikkor to Fuji
are available... Again, YMMV.


I found one! Now, if I just could find a wired EF to EF-M at the same
pricepoint... Then I just might...

http://tinyurl.com/p2jn7zw
--
teleportation kills
  #3  
Old June 3rd 15, 09:18 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default Metabones Speed Booster, a self-killing flop?

RichA Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 00:49:39 UTC-4, android wrote:
In article ,
RichA wrote:

Apparently, this expensive ($400+ depending on converting what mount to what
mount) device, designed to speed-up a lens by 1 f-stop (and in the process
reducing the effective focal length by about 30%) causes the light rays to
slant so much entering the sensor, that some of the light never makes it into
the pixel, resulting in a net SLOWER aperture than the original lens has! In
other words, it negated its own claimed function!!! However, on long focal
length lenses this effect will be lessened because the light rays from the
principal lens are more perpendicular to the sensor. The Speed Booster is a
reverse-teleconverter really, that fits between the lens and the camera.
That the device doesn't kill lens resolution and adds only a small amount of
colour error is impressive, however. Unfortunately, the Holy Grail of
blinding sub-f/1.00 f-ratio speed is still in the hands of $1000 Voigtlanders
and $12,000 Leica lenses.


There are knock offs by the buckets on the bay. $100-ish. Nikkor to Fuji
are available... Again, YMMV.
--
teleportation kills


I saw a test between some of the knock-offs and the Metabones. The Metabones slaughtered them for sharpness, colour correction so for what it's worth, it's the best out there right now. As a lens focal length reducer, it's ok.

If you mean the test that I've linked below then I think that
you're exagerating... And other combos might yield other results
and this test was made on one of those pitiful quarterframe
sensors.

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53156458

--
Bats can't tell us apart!


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Biggest camera flop of last 2 years? nospam Digital Photography 1 September 17th 12 03:45 AM
FS Canon EOS 10D with BG-ED3 booster (Uk) Andy Torkington T-Tech Digital Media Ltd Digital Photo Equipment For Sale 0 February 14th 05 11:38 AM
WTB: Lumedyne booster, modeling head, hsm, grids, speed rings, batteries, etc. - NYC only hassy_user General Equipment For Sale 0 November 10th 04 03:32 PM
FS: Minolta Booster II kit davidb Large Format Equipment For Sale 1 November 8th 04 03:14 PM
FS: Canon PB-E1 Pwr booster for EOS 1-1N Gngphoto Medium Format Equipment For Sale 0 July 27th 04 03:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.