If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
Recommendations please on the best value digital slr back Leica R
lenses can be adapted to. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
TJ wrote:
Recommendations please on the best value digital slr back Leica R lenses can be adapted to. The Leica Digital Modul-R will fit all R9 and later R8 bodies, converting them from 35mm film to 10.3 MP digital bodies. Results are outstanding as there is no anti-alias filter so resolution is extremely good. Production of the Digital Modul-R has now ended but they do appear on eBay and at Leica specialists, albeit at fairly high prices. Otherwise, the Canon EOS system is the obvious choice. I use two Canon EOS 5D bodies with Leica and Carl Zeiss (Contax) lenses, plus three Canon L zooms, and I am very happy with the results. I recommend buying and using one adapter per lens; using one adapter for several lenses is false economy and slows you down considerably. Obviously you only get manual focus and you have to meter with them lens stopped down. You can get adapters with focus confirmation but they need to be carefully calibrated for the specific lens in use and my experience with them has been poor, so I don't use them. I have a Leica 21-35mm zoom, a 50mm f/2 and a 180mm f/3.4, plus Contax 18mm, 21mm, 35mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.4 lenses plus a Tamron 90mm macro. The Canon L zooms are the 16-35mm f/2.8 II, the 24-105mm f/2.8 IS and the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS. For the work I do, this is as near to a perfect outfit as I could imagine, although I am tempted to buy a Nikon D3 and some Carl Zeiss ZF lenses, which would give me full aperture metering. Maybe next year! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
In article ,
Tony Polson wrote: TJ wrote: Recommendations please on the best value digital slr back Leica R lenses can be adapted to. The Leica Digital Modul-R will fit all R9 and later R8 bodies, converting them from 35mm film to 10.3 MP digital bodies. Results are outstanding as there is no anti-alias filter so resolution is extremely good. Production of the Digital Modul-R has now ended but they do appear on eBay and at Leica specialists, albeit at fairly high prices. Otherwise, the Canon EOS system is the obvious choice. I use two Canon EOS 5D bodies with Leica and Carl Zeiss (Contax) lenses, plus three Canon L zooms, and I am very happy with the results. I recommend buying and using one adapter per lens; using one adapter for several lenses is false economy and slows you down considerably. Obviously you only get manual focus and you have to meter with them lens stopped down. You can get adapters with focus confirmation but they need to be carefully calibrated for the specific lens in use and my experience with them has been poor, so I don't use them. I have a Leica 21-35mm zoom, a 50mm f/2 and a 180mm f/3.4, plus Contax 18mm, 21mm, 35mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.4 lenses plus a Tamron 90mm macro. The Canon L zooms are the 16-35mm f/2.8 II, the 24-105mm f/2.8 IS and the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS. For the work I do, this is as near to a perfect outfit as I could imagine, although I am tempted to buy a Nikon D3 and some Carl Zeiss ZF lenses, which would give me full aperture metering. Maybe next year! You seem to be tiptoeing around Nikkor lenses. Although I'm a Nikkor fan of long-standing, I don't regard my preference as a religion, nor do I indulge in the "Brand N is better than Brand Z" rhetoric. Still, for the focal lengths you favor, (opinion alert!) I consider classic Nikon glass like the 17-35/2.8, 180/2.8 (ED versions in MF or AF), several of the 20's. 35's, and 85's, as well as the modern VR zooms, to be superior in quality to the Canon counterparts, and any pro-level Nikkor to be so close in IQ to the Leitz and Zeiss offerings as to make the price premium of German lenses ridiculous. (I should break that last sentence up into at least three.) Sooooooo, why would you buy ZF's for a D3? I sometimes (not often) manually focus my AF lenses, but basically have been won over by AF, and it's been my observation that most comparisons (here's one) http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=21244546 either favor Nikon outright, or at least acknowledge that differences are slight, while price differential isn't. -- "It is the individual alone who is timeless. The individual's hungers, anxieties, dreams, and preoccupations have remained unchanged throughout the millennia." Eric Hoffer (1902-1983) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
"TJ" wrote: Recommendations please on the best value digital slr back Leica R lenses can be adapted to. My understanding is that there are Leica R to Canon 5D adapters. The 5D is available for around US$2000, and it gives you full frame, 12.7MP, a correctly designed sensor (Leica sensors lack IR and low-pass filters), and good high-ISO performance. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
On Dec 22, 4:45 pm, TJ wrote:
Recommendations please on the best value digital slr back Leica R lenses can be adapted to. Best value? Canon's 5D body at around $1800 discounted. If you want a pro body, Olympus's E-3. If you really want to save money, Olympus's E-510 would be a good choice at about $500. All can use adapters. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
RichA wrote:
On Dec 22, 4:45 pm, TJ wrote: Recommendations please on the best value digital slr back Leica R lenses can be adapted to. Best value? Canon's 5D body at around $1800 discounted. If you want a pro body, Olympus's E-3. If you really want to save money, Olympus's E-510 would be a good choice at about $500. All can use adapters. It seems to me that you will not get the best out of Leica lenses which have not been designed for digital sensors by putting them on a full-frame digital sensor body, and that there are obvious compromises by using them on the quarter-size Olympus system. David |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
On 23 Dec, 05:22, RichA wrote:
On Dec 22, 4:45 pm, TJ wrote: Recommendations please on the best value digital slr back Leica R lenses can be adapted to. Best value? *Canon's 5D body at around $1800 discounted. *If you want a pro body, Olympus's E-3. If you really want to save money, Olympus's E-510 would be a good choice at about $500. *All can use adapters. Many thanks for this info, I have the Elmarit 19, 35 and 90mm F2.8 lenses. Fankly although the 35 and 90 are everything you expect from Leica it's only the 19mm wide angle I would put on an adapter on a digital back. Probably on a Canon EOS because of the huge range of Canon zoom lenses to use on auto with the digital. I want a 'super' wide angle lens for occasional shots The 19mm lens is an 'old' 70's optical design and weighs so much it's probably more an a Voigtlander 35mm rangefinder camera with a 15mm super wide angle lens combined. What are you recommendations on super wide prime lenses (manual use is OK) which like Leica can go on a Canon digital back? TJ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
Tully wrote:
You seem to be tiptoeing around Nikkor lenses. Although I'm a Nikkor fan of long-standing, I don't regard my preference as a religion, nor do I indulge in the "Brand N is better than Brand Z" rhetoric. Having been a Nikon user for many years, I am well aware of the existence of some great Nikon optics. Still, for the focal lengths you favor, (opinion alert!) I consider classic Nikon glass like the 17-35/2.8, 180/2.8 (ED versions in MF or AF), several of the 20's. 35's, and 85's, as well as the modern VR zooms, to be superior in quality to the Canon counterparts, and any pro-level Nikkor to be so close in IQ to the Leitz and Zeiss offerings as to make the price premium of German lenses ridiculous. (I should break that last sentence up into at least three.) I left the Nikon system because the Nikkor lenses in some of my most used focal lengths were disappointing. They might have been sharp but their OOF rendition left a lot to be desired. There are no really good Nikkors in 20mm, 35mm and 50mm focal lengths. The 20mm has hideous "moustache" distortion which needs careful correction. The 35mm f/2, 50mm f/1.8 and f/1.4 all have very harsh bokeh. When I changed to Pentax I found an outstanding range of lenses which had a combination of sharpness and bokeh that was only bettered by Leica glass. The Carl Zeiss ZF lenses for Nikon AIS bring new levels of optical performance to Nikon bodies. And they are far from expensive, probably because they are made in Japan by Cosina, but under Carl Zeiss quality control. Your assertions that, overall, Nikon's lenses are superior to Canon's and equal to Zeiss and Leica (not Leitz any more) are not borne out in practice. This is a classic case of brand worship obscuring the truth. Sooooooo, why would you buy ZF's for a D3? I sometimes (not often) manually focus my AF lenses, but basically have been won over by AF, and it's been my observation that most comparisons (here's one) http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=21244546 either favor Nikon outright, or at least acknowledge that differences are slight, while price differential isn't. I'm not surprised that you chose to quote such a biased opinion, because by sheer coincidence, it just happens to agree with your own biased opinion! The Zeiss lenses are not expensive. For the quality they offer, they are actually remarkably cheap. And the reason that I would buy them for a D3 is that Nikon's own lenses are still not good enough. Yes, they are plenty sharp, but that is at the expense of other desirable optical qualities. People who judge lenses on sharpness alone are missing the point. It is like judging a DSLR body solely on the number of megapixels its sensor delivers. And there are a great many people who make that silly mistake too. It does seem to me that digital capture has blinded a great many people to the more desirable optical qualities of a lens. Perhaps they think that you can buy any old junk lens, make a few corrections in software and get a superlative result. But you cannot. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:17:52 +0000, Tony Polson
wrote: People who judge lenses on sharpness alone are missing the point. This is an often overlooked - but true - assertion that can never be over-emphasised. Needless to say: I agree. It does seem to me that digital capture has blinded a great many people to the more desirable optical qualities of a lens. And then some :-( -- John Bean |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses?
John Bean wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:17:52 +0000, Tony Polson wrote: People who judge lenses on sharpness alone are missing the point. This is an often overlooked - but true - assertion that can never be over-emphasised. Needless to say: I agree. It does seem to me that digital capture has blinded a great many people to the more desirable optical qualities of a lens. And then some :-( Thanks, John. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leica kills the R digital back | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | April 19th 07 10:52 PM |
Ebay for x-mas, Leica M2, Lecia R3, five leica lenses | Eddie | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 14th 05 05:25 AM |
New Leica digital back info.... | Barney | 35mm Photo Equipment | 19 | June 30th 04 12:45 AM |
Leica 10MP Digital Back for R8, R9 | TP | 35mm Photo Equipment | 4 | June 24th 04 07:30 AM |
FS: Leica Adapter to Use Nikkor SLR Lenses on your M Series Leica | Don Whipple | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | September 24th 03 04:05 AM |