If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it useEXIF?)
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?)
http://www.tineye.com A friend told me I can search TinEye for free to find my pictures to see if anyone has posted them to the net. I tested a few of mine - but none showed up on the net. But maybe people removed the EXIF information or cropped them or filtered them in software or did something to obfuscate them. I doubt you'd have the exact algorithm (nor would I know what to do with it), but, do you at least know roughly how the TinEye program discerns duplicates? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?)
In article ,
William Don**ly wrote: How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?) http://www.tineye.com A friend told me I can search TinEye for free to find my pictures to see if anyone has posted them to the net. I tested a few of mine - but none showed up on the net. But maybe people removed the EXIF information or cropped them or filtered them in software or did something to obfuscate them. I doubt you'd have the exact algorithm (nor would I know what to do with it), but, do you at least know roughly how the TinEye program discerns duplicates? TinEye doesn't need EXIF data. I'd imagine that they analyze images for simple features that can be listed and cataloged. The features for an image doesn't need to perfectly describe it. It just needs to narrow down potential matches enough that they can be further analyzed in real-time. It's not unlike the secret-sauce complex analysis that web page search engines perform. They're not matching words, but meanings in a context for a specific culture. Google has claimed that they can even interpret the images in a web page. -- I will not see posts from Google because I must filter them as spam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?)
William Don**ly writes:
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?) http://www.tineye.com It doesn't use EXIF or associated text information, it looks at the image itself (as does the option in Google Image Search to look for similar images). A friend told me I can search TinEye for free to find my pictures to see if anyone has posted them to the net. It can, I've found lots of copies of things posted to the web through those services. Neither one is guaranteed to find *every* copy, and TinEye in particular doesn't seem to index that much of the web, so it misses a lot. I tested a few of mine - but none showed up on the net. But maybe people removed the EXIF information or cropped them or filtered them in software or did something to obfuscate them. Cropping will often not confuse TinEye. Sufficient filtering will, but mild filtering won't necessarily. I doubt you'd have the exact algorithm (nor would I know what to do with it), but, do you at least know roughly how the TinEye program discerns duplicates? I don't know anything about the kind of algorithms that are used for this, my self, sorry. -- Googleproofaddress(account:dd-b provider:dd-b domain:net) Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?)
"William Don**ly" wrote in message ... I doubt you'd have the exact algorithm (nor would I know what to do with it), but, do you at least know roughly how the TinEye program discerns duplicates? I have no more idea than David. "image search algorithm" brings up some pointers on the first page. A deeper dig finds one paper comparing three approaches. I'm sure you'll be able to turn up more with research. A Comparison of SIFT, PCA-SIFT and SURF by Luo Juan & Oubong Gwun http://www.cscjournals.org/csc/manus...e4/IJIP-51.pdf -- Charles E. Hardwidge |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it useEXIF?)
William Don**ly wrote:
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?) http://www.tineye.com A friend told me I can search TinEye for free to find my pictures to see if anyone has posted them to the net. I tested a few of mine - but none showed up on the net. But maybe people removed the EXIF information or cropped them or filtered them in software or did something to obfuscate them. I doubt you'd have the exact algorithm (nor would I know what to do with it), but, do you at least know roughly how the TinEye program discerns duplicates? Pattern recognition software. Its the same way the government tracks your movements via facial patterns from 100 meters away. Tineye could not possibly download each file then compare the exif data from each one. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?)
"Paul in Houston TX" wrote in message ... William Don**ly wrote: How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?) http://www.tineye.com A friend told me I can search TinEye for free to find my pictures to see if anyone has posted them to the net. I tested a few of mine - but none showed up on the net. But maybe people removed the EXIF information or cropped them or filtered them in software or did something to obfuscate them. I doubt you'd have the exact algorithm (nor would I know what to do with it), but, do you at least know roughly how the TinEye program discerns duplicates? Pattern recognition software. Its the same way the government tracks your movements via facial patterns from 100 meters away. Tineye could not possibly download each file then compare the exif data from each one. There is also (among others, I think) yandex.ru, which sometimes but not always returns the same result as tineye. I've found a few "Who stole my pictures?" culprits through these tools, but I know of others they don't find. -- Frank ess |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it useEXIF?)
Frank S wrote:
There is also (among others, I think) yandex.ru, which sometimes but not always returns the same result as tineye. So that makes at least 3 of those picture finders out the 1. Images.Google.Com (finds similar pictures also) 2. TinEye.Com (finds the same picture) 3. yandex.ru (not sure what it does since it's in Rusky) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How does TinEye actually work to identify a photo (does it use EXIF?)
On Friday, December 28, 2012 6:25:44 AM UTC+1, William Don**ly wrote:
Frank S wrote: There is also (among others, I think) yandex.ru, which sometimes but not always returns the same result as tineye. So that makes at least 3 of those picture finders out the 1. Images.Google.Com (finds similar pictures also) 2. TinEye.Com (finds the same picture) 3. yandex.ru (not sure what it does since it's in Rusky) It's a bit doubtful how effective these kinds of attempts to police your images are likely to be. Take for instance these beautiful pics of slime molds by a flickr user: http://www.flickr.com/photos/myriora...n/set-1271006/ This user seems to object to downloading of his images (downloading is disabled at flickr). Yet if you search for them, they pop up on many sites: http://tinyurl.com/d3m6nlb Some of them even seem to neglect mentioning the source: http://metapsychic.tumblr.com/post/4...811/slime-mold It seems like a rather futile effort to try and prevent pictures from being reproduced and distributed. But perhaps there are companies that can be hired to police your intellectual property. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
search photo archives TinEye | philo | Digital Photography | 13 | May 10th 12 12:10 AM |
Is anyone using 2 monitors for photo work? | Rich | Digital Photography | 23 | April 14th 07 07:01 AM |
New photo galleries of my work | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital SLR Cameras | 7 | April 11th 07 10:13 AM |
Mac vs. pc for photo work | Howard | Digital Photography | 78 | February 12th 05 07:08 PM |
Theme : identifY chemical products/ graphic arts, photo-lithography,alternative techniques. | Albane | In The Darkroom | 3 | June 20th 04 01:52 AM |