A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 23rd 18, 10:04 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Eric Stevens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,611
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

Chroma camera
https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...4-field-camera

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

--

Regards,

Eric Stevens
  #2  
Old February 23rd 18, 10:14 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera


film, not digital.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(


there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.
  #3  
Old February 23rd 18, 10:44 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Alan Browne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 696
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

On 2018-02-23 16:04, Eric Stevens wrote:
Chroma camera
https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...4-field-camera


https://tinyurl.com/ybspbw93 ... via firefox & TinyURL site



--
“When it is all said and done, there are approximately 94 million
full-time workers in private industry paying taxes to support 102
million non-workers and 21 million government workers.
In what world does this represent a strong job market?”
..Jim Quinn
  #4  
Old February 23rd 18, 11:58 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Eric Stevens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,611
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:14:29 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera


film, not digital.


Read the subject line.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(


there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.


It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens
  #5  
Old February 24th 18, 12:00 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...tweight-afford
able-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera


film, not digital.


Read the subject line.


read the name of the newsgroup.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(


there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.


It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.


tinyurl doesn't need a toolbar item, and as i said, there's no need for
url shorterners on usenet.
  #6  
Old February 24th 18, 12:31 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Alan Browne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 696
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

On 2018-02-23 17:58, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:14:29 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera


film, not digital.


Read the subject line.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(


there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.


It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.


1) You can just type "tinyurl" in the url bar and a link to it will
appear quickly.
2) You can put a bookbar shortcut in the bookmarks toolbar.

Not sure what the security issue could be as long as you edit the
bookmarks yourself. (Unless Firefox has some peculiar fault).

--
“When it is all said and done, there are approximately 94 million
full-time workers in private industry paying taxes to support 102
million non-workers and 21 million government workers.
In what world does this represent a strong job market?”
..Jim Quinn
  #7  
Old February 24th 18, 05:14 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Eric Stevens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,611
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

rOn Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:00:25 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...tweight-afford
able-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.


Read the subject line.


read the name of the newsgroup.


You f***ing idiot! Why do you think I put the words "digital back"
into the heading?

Don't you know what a digital back is?

Just look at this one, for example (one of many).
https://fotodioxpro.com/products/hbh-4x5-pro
or this one
http://www.digital-photography.org/D..._field_pro.htm


Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.


It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.


tinyurl doesn't need a toolbar item, and as i said, there's no need for
url shorterners on usenet.

--

Regards,

Eric Stevens
  #8  
Old February 24th 18, 05:17 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Eric Stevens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,611
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:31:47 -0500, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2018-02-23 17:58, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:14:29 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.


Read the subject line.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(

there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to
firefox.


It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security
grounds.


1) You can just type "tinyurl" in the url bar and a link to it will
appear quickly.
2) You can put a bookbar shortcut in the bookmarks toolbar.


Agreed, but not as convenient as having it on the tool bar. I used to
be able to click on the tool bar and within a second or so I had it in
in the cliboard.

Not sure what the security issue could be as long as you edit the
bookmarks yourself. (Unless Firefox has some peculiar fault).


Something to do with lack of https.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens
  #9  
Old February 24th 18, 05:21 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
RJH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 228
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

On 23/02/2018 21:14, nospam wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Chroma camera

https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl
e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera


film, not digital.

Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-(


there's never a need for that on usenet,


There is if you use Thunderbird ;-)


--
Cheers, Rob
  #10  
Old February 24th 18, 06:29 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ightweight-aff
ordable-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera

film, not digital.

Read the subject line.


read the name of the newsgroup.


You f***ing idiot! Why do you think I put the words "digital back"
into the heading?

Don't you know what a digital back is?


i do, but don't expect to find one that's any good a price you can
afford.

Just look at this one, for example (one of many).
https://fotodioxpro.com/products/hbh-4x5-pro


junk. laughably so.

why bother using a 4x5 camera if you're only going to mount an slr on
the back?

or this one

http://www.digital-photography.org/D...al/dicomed_fie
ld_pro.htm


that article is almost 20 years old, but at least they used a mac,
except that particular mac is long discontinued, so even if you can
find the back, it won't do you any good.

here's a bunch of backs, using that 'new high-speed usb 2' technology:
http://www.betterlight.com/products4X5.html

the cheaper ones have less resolution than modern slrs and their top of
the line model is about what a medium format camera can do. and then
there's that perfectly still subject problem.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
digital back for sf1 biffster Digital Photography 4 April 28th 08 01:53 AM
Digital back for F3? Aaron Blacksmith Digital SLR Cameras 14 May 13th 05 05:03 PM
digital back on MF vs digital 35mm? ColdCanuck Digital Photography 12 January 15th 05 12:00 AM
digital back on MF vs digital 35mm? ColdCanuck Digital Photography 0 January 14th 05 05:59 AM
Digital back! Mojtaba Medium Format Photography Equipment 8 August 19th 04 11:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.