|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
November 15th 04, 03:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Rail fans
On topic - all photos 10D.
http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. -- http://www.rupert.net/~solar Return address supplied by 'spammotel' http://www.spammotel.com 
|
|
#2
November 15th 04, 04:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ken Davey wrote: On topic - all photos 10D. http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. Hi... Nice. No excuses necessary  Question though, if I may? How in the world could a train possibly travel on those tracks without bucking itself off the tracks? Are the 'squiggly' tracks still in use? Take care. Ken
|
|
#3
November 15th 04, 04:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ken Weitzel wrote:
Ken Davey wrote: On topic - all photos 10D. http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. Hi... Nice. No excuses necessary Question though, if I may? How in the world could a train possibly travel on those tracks without bucking itself off the tracks? Are the 'squiggly' tracks still in use? Take care. Ken They are still in use. I travel on those tracks (that train) almost daily. It is *slow*. I am talking about almost being able to beat the train to town walking fast. Regards. Ken. -- http://www.rupert.net/~solar Return address supplied by 'spammotel' http://www.spammotel.com
|
|
#4
November 15th 04, 04:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ken Weitzel wrote:
Ken Davey wrote: On topic - all photos 10D. http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. Hi... Nice. No excuses necessary Question though, if I may? How in the world could a train possibly travel on those tracks without bucking itself off the tracks? Are the 'squiggly' tracks still in use? Take care. Ken They are still in use. I travel on those tracks (that train) almost daily. It is *slow*. I am talking about almost being able to beat the train to town walking fast. Regards. Ken. -- http://www.rupert.net/~solar Return address supplied by 'spammotel' http://www.spammotel.com
|
|
#5
November 15th 04, 04:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ken Davey wrote:
Ken Weitzel wrote: Ken Davey wrote: On topic - all photos 10D. http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. Hi... Nice. No excuses necessary Question though, if I may? How in the world could a train possibly travel on those tracks without bucking itself off the tracks? Are the 'squiggly' tracks still in use? Take care. Ken They are still in use. I travel on those tracks (that train) almost daily. It is *slow*. I am talking about almost being able to beat the train to town walking fast. Regards. Ken. I really enjoyed seeing this little slice of life. Sad how transient even the 'solid' things can be. Thanks for the opportunity. I'm not seeing the Ceiba map. Is there one too many jpgs in the image source file name? -- Frank ess
|
|
#6
November 15th 04, 04:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Frank ess wrote:
Ken Davey wrote: Ken Weitzel wrote: Ken Davey wrote: On topic - all photos 10D. http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. Hi... Nice. No excuses necessary Question though, if I may? How in the world could a train possibly travel on those tracks without bucking itself off the tracks? Are the 'squiggly' tracks still in use? Take care. Ken They are still in use. I travel on those tracks (that train) almost daily. It is *slow*. I am talking about almost being able to beat the train to town walking fast. Regards. Ken. I really enjoyed seeing this little slice of life. Sad how transient even the 'solid' things can be. Thanks for the opportunity. I'm not seeing the Ceiba map. Is there one too many jpgs in the image source file name? Could be. I have been having trouble with that page. Will keep working on it. Ken. -- http://www.rupert.net/~solar Return address supplied by 'spammotel' http://www.spammotel.com
|
|
#7
November 15th 04, 04:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Frank ess wrote:
Ken Davey wrote: Ken Weitzel wrote: Ken Davey wrote: On topic - all photos 10D. http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. Hi... Nice. No excuses necessary Question though, if I may? How in the world could a train possibly travel on those tracks without bucking itself off the tracks? Are the 'squiggly' tracks still in use? Take care. Ken They are still in use. I travel on those tracks (that train) almost daily. It is *slow*. I am talking about almost being able to beat the train to town walking fast. Regards. Ken. I really enjoyed seeing this little slice of life. Sad how transient even the 'solid' things can be. Thanks for the opportunity. I'm not seeing the Ceiba map. Is there one too many jpgs in the image source file name? Could be. I have been having trouble with that page. Will keep working on it. Ken. -- http://www.rupert.net/~solar Return address supplied by 'spammotel' http://www.spammotel.com
|
|
#8
November 15th 04, 02:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ken,
Interesting and I for one would like to see more. May I ask what you are doing in that part of the world? Bob S. "Ken Davey" wrote in message ... On topic - all photos 10D. http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. -- http://www.rupert.net/~solar Return address supplied by 'spammotel' http://www.spammotel.com
|
|
#9
November 15th 04, 02:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ken,
Interesting and I for one would like to see more. May I ask what you are doing in that part of the world? Bob S. "Ken Davey" wrote in message ... On topic - all photos 10D. http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. -- http://www.rupert.net/~solar Return address supplied by 'spammotel' http://www.spammotel.com
|
|
#10
November 15th 04, 03:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ken Weitzel wrote:
Ken Davey wrote: On topic - all photos 10D. http://www.rupert.net/~solar/ Comments welcome. There are glaring mistakes due to my primitive understanding of Photoshop but it was a work of love. Regards. Ken. Hi... Nice. No excuses necessary Question though, if I may? How in the world could a train possibly travel on those tracks without bucking itself off the tracks? Are the 'squiggly' tracks still in use? Take care. Ken Lends a whole new meaning to the term 'light rail' doesn't it? -- jer email reply - I am not a 'ten'
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Twisted Sister Fans of the World, Unite! | subRoutine@W2mm | Digital Photography | 7 | August 2nd 04 06:34 PM |
| Need 4x5 Crown Graphic bed rail | Murray | Large Format Photography Equipment | 1 | February 17th 04 01:17 AM |
Linear Mode
