A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 17th 15, 07:12 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

On 2015-09-17 06:02:43 +0000, nospam said:

In article , android
wrote:

Well... It's not WRONG to call raw RAW, even though nospam probably
wouldn't, but the meaning of RAW is raw. Like sushi, packed but not
altered. ;-)


raw is not an acronym and therefore should not be capitalized.


however in the nospam world nothing is capitalized. oh thats right
"NOTHING" should be capitalized.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #12  
Old September 17th 15, 07:15 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

In article ,
nospam wrote:

In article , android
wrote:

Well... It's not WRONG to call raw RAW, even though nospam probably
wouldn't, but the meaning of RAW is raw. Like sushi, packed but not
altered. ;-)


raw is not an acronym and therefore should not be capitalized.


thank's dude...

acronymfinder.com:

RAW stands for Reggae Ambassadors Worldwide:

http://www.acronymfinder.com/Reggae-...%28RAW%29.html
--
teleportation kills
  #13  
Old September 17th 15, 07:17 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

In article , android
wrote:

RAW stands for Reggae Ambassadors Worldwide:

http://www.acronymfinder.com/Reggae-...%28RAW%29.html


so i have to use jpeg for jazz concerts?
  #14  
Old September 17th 15, 07:18 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

On 2015-09-17 06:15:58 +0000, android said:

In article ,
nospam wrote:

In article , android
wrote:

Well... It's not WRONG to call raw RAW, even though nospam probably
wouldn't, but the meaning of RAW is raw. Like sushi, packed but not
altered. ;-)


raw is not an acronym and therefore should not be capitalized.


thank's dude...

acronymfinder.com:

RAW stands for Reggae Ambassadors Worldwide:

http://www.acronymfinder.com/Reggae-...%28RAW%29.html


....and here I was thinking it was Ratfaced Asshole Wanckers.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #15  
Old September 17th 15, 07:24 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

In article ,
nospam wrote:

In article , android
wrote:

RAW stands for Reggae Ambassadors Worldwide:

http://www.acronymfinder.com/Reggae-...%28RAW%29.html


so i have to use jpeg for jazz concerts?


jazz is so very much about improvisation...
--
teleportation kills
  #16  
Old September 17th 15, 07:24 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

In article , android
wrote:

RAW stands for Reggae Ambassadors Worldwide:

http://www.acronymfinder.com/Reggae-...%28RAW%29.html


so i have to use jpeg for jazz concerts?


jazz is so very much about improvisation...


so are jpegs.
  #17  
Old September 17th 15, 10:53 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
John McWilliams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

On 9/16/15 PDT 11:18 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2015-09-17 06:15:58 +0000, android said:

In article ,
nospam wrote:

In article , android
wrote:

Well... It's not WRONG to call raw RAW, even though nospam probably
wouldn't, but the meaning of RAW is raw. Like sushi, packed but not
altered. ;-)

raw is not an acronym and therefore should not be capitalized.


thank's dude...

acronymfinder.com:

RAW stands for Reggae Ambassadors Worldwide:

http://www.acronymfinder.com/Reggae-...%28RAW%29.html


...and here I was thinking it was Ratfaced Asshole Wanckers.

You'd be right, 'ceptin' "******s" doesn't take the c. And where it
takes it, I shudder to think.
  #18  
Old September 17th 15, 10:56 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
John McWilliams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

On 9/16/15 PDT 11:02 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , android
wrote:

Well... It's not WRONG to call raw RAW, even though nospam probably
wouldn't, but the meaning of RAW is raw. Like sushi, packed but not
altered. ;-)


raw is not an acronym and therefore should not be capitalized.

Well, you are wrong. The devisors of the format gave it that name and
spelling.

Or we could also argue that iPhone is all wrong, etc.
  #19  
Old September 17th 15, 11:56 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Floyd L. Davidson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,138
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

nospam wrote:
In article , android
wrote:

Well... It's not WRONG to call raw RAW, even though nospam probably
wouldn't, but the meaning of RAW is raw. Like sushi, packed but not
altered. ;-)


raw is not an acronym and therefore should not be capitalized.


A RAW file does not use an acronym, therefore your rules about
acronyms do not apply. It's a convention.

Sort of like having enough sense to learn to use upper case
characters to make you writing more readable, or being an
arrogant ass and not...

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
  #20  
Old September 17th 15, 05:04 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default Confusing review about noise and detail in RAW vs. best JPEG

On 2015-09-17 15:16:14 +0000, Tony Cooper said:

On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:02:43 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , android
wrote:

Well... It's not WRONG to call raw RAW, even though nospam probably
wouldn't, but the meaning of RAW is raw. Like sushi, packed but not
altered. ;-)


raw is not an acronym and therefore should not be capitalized.


IBM is not an acronym. Still, it should be capitalized or the FBI
(not an acronym) will come after you.

Scuba and laser are acronyms. It is not necessary to capitalize these
words.


As are sonar (Sound Navigation and Ranging), radar (Radio Detection and
Ranging, lidar (Light Detection and Ranging), vascar (Visual Average
Speed Computer & Recorder), etc.

NASCAR (National Association of Stock Car Auto Racing) is both acronym
and brand.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Confusing camera product names and series [email protected] Other Photographic Equipment 12 May 7th 07 05:49 AM
Magazine review of noise control systems RichA Digital SLR Cameras 4 September 25th 06 10:42 PM
Confusing Reviews measekite Digital ZLR Cameras 5 January 14th 06 12:24 AM
RAW mode showing more noise than JPEG... GoogleSher Digital Photography 12 January 8th 05 01:52 AM
Minolta Numbering System: Confusing For a Beginner [email protected] 35mm Photo Equipment 0 January 4th 05 07:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.