If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
"Pudentame" wrote in message ... jeremy wrote: Well, many of us sensed that it was coming. Pentax had been a longtime user of Hoya optical glass, but to see Hoya swallow Pentax us is disconcerting. These mergers nearly always result in big changes, and I would not be surprised if the "Pentax" name disappears entirely over the next few years. Actually, the "Pentax" name is one of the more valuable things Hoya's getting from the deal. I expect they'll be keeping it at least in the photography business. The driving factor behind the merger appears to be Pentax and Hoya combining their efforts in the medical imaging field. No, the driving factor is that Pentax has lagged behind Canon and Nikon in the digital camera business, and is now having to deal with competition from companies that previously had not entered the camera business, like Sony, Panasonic, Casio and HP. Pentax screwed up, big-time, and they are no longer viable. Hoya will get no more mileage out of the Pentax brand name than Konica got out of their use of the Minolta name. People are getting wise to the fact that the mere presence of a well-known brand name does not guarantee that the former quality levels are going to be maintained. I'm upset over the loss of Pentax, but I really have only myself to blame. Pentax began going down the slippery slope shortly after they abandoned the screw mount. Their cameras and lenses slowly began to be cheapened, and build quality became noticeably inferior to previous products. Nikon and Canon did the same thing, but they maintained parallel lines of "professional" gear, priced high, but still available to those that wanted it. What did Pentax do? They exited the professional camera market when they withdrew the LX from production, and they produced only 3 FA Limited lenses for film cameras, and even those had non-standard focal lengths. I read recently that Pentax committed to expanding their factories in VIETNAM, apparently as a means of keeping their costs down because of cheaper labor. Sorry, but this boy ain't buying a Vietnamese camera--not from Pentax and not from anybody else, either. And I think that a lot of us feel the same way. I don't anticipate crowds lining up to buy the "Hoya-Pentax" brand of cameras and lenses ("SMC Hoya-Pentax?") It just may be the right time for me to embrace plastic bodies and buy some Nikon or Canon digital gear. I'm just in the dumps over hearing that news of Pentax's upcoming demise. We're going to become orphans. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pelican swallows pigeon | Daniel Silevitch | Digital Photography | 31 | October 31st 06 05:04 PM |
Hoya HMC CP filter | Eydz | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | October 22nd 06 01:21 AM |
Hoya 67mm circular polarizer + Hoya Skylight + Nikon D70 - some problems | Nicolae Fieraru | Digital Photography | 16 | April 10th 05 11:10 AM |
Hoya 67mm circular polarizer + Hoya Skylight + Nikon D70 - some problems | Nicolae Fieraru | Digital Photography | 0 | April 9th 05 06:03 AM |
Hoya Filters UV(0) OR UV(N) | ianr | Digital Photography | 0 | January 27th 05 10:31 PM |