If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
On 2016-06-18 19:36:24 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2016-06-18 19:17:51 +0000, Mort said: nospam wrote: In article , Mort wrote: Just another reason we should understand the difference between "free goods" - which are goods you get to keep at no charge - and "free use", which is access to something at no charge. This is seen often when looking up a telephone number on line. The search is indeed free, but one is asked to pay up to $25.- to see the result of the search. you are *definitely* using the wrong sites. Please give me the URL of a site(s) where I can look up telephone numbers free. Thank you. Mort Linder This has always worked for me: http://www.anywho.com/whitepages In the USA anyway. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
In article , Mort wrote:
This is seen often when looking up a telephone number on line. The search is indeed free, but one is asked to pay up to $25.- to see the result of the search. you are *definitely* using the wrong sites. Please give me the URL of a site(s) where I can look up telephone numbers free. http://www.whitepages.com/person http://www.anywho.com/whitepages http://whitepages.dexknows.com http://www.addresses.com note that there may be *additional* services offered for a fee, but you can ignore that (unless you want it). |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
Hi,
Thanks very much indeed. I will soon try your suggested link. I want to clarify that I never actually paid to get a telephone number. I just get annoyed because while the search is "free", getting the result involves a hefty charge. Mort Linder Savageduck wrote: On 2016-06-18 19:17:51 +0000, Mort said: nospam wrote: In article , Mort wrote: Just another reason we should understand the difference between "free goods" - which are goods you get to keep at no charge - and "free use", which is access to something at no charge. This is seen often when looking up a telephone number on line. The search is indeed free, but one is asked to pay up to $25.- to see the result of the search. you are *definitely* using the wrong sites. Please give me the URL of a site(s) where I can look up telephone numbers free. Thank you. Mort Linder This has always worked for me: http://www.anywho.com/whitepages |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
| Please give me the URL of a site(s) where I can look up telephone
| numbers free. 411.com tel2name.com superpages.com switchboard.com But many numbers these days are cellphones. you can usually get the town where the phone is registered, but not the name. You only get the name if it's listed in the phone book. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
In article , Mayayana
wrote: But many numbers these days are cellphones. you can usually get the town where the phone is registered, but not the name. You only get the name if it's listed in the phone book. it's possible to get names for cellphones. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
Mayayana wrote:
| Please give me the URL of a site(s) where I can look up telephone | numbers free. 411.com tel2name.com superpages.com switchboard.com But many numbers these days are cellphones. you can usually get the town where the phone is registered, but not the name. You only get the name if it's listed in the phone book. Hi Mayayana, Thank you for the suggestions, which I shall soon try. I have never gotten a spam call from a cellphone here in the USA, for some reason. Mort |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
In article , Mort
wrote: I have never gotten a spam call from a cellphone here in the USA, for some reason. you're lucky. spammers powerdial whatever numbers they want, usually with spoofed clid. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
| Thank you for the suggestions, which I shall soon try. I have never
| gotten a spam call from a cellphone here in the USA, for some reason. | That's surprising. I wonder how you know. If your caller ID says private caller then it's a blocked landline. But if it just says something like "Denver, CO" then it's a cellphone. I get mostly cellphone calls these days. They try to trick people into picking up. And as nospam said, they can also spoof. I occasionally get calls from myself. It's got so bad that I don't pick up at all anymore unless I know who it is. If someone is calling from a cellphone and I don't recognize the number then they just have to leave a message. If you're interested in this for spam calls you might also find these two interesting: www.whocallsme.com www.whycall.me They list known information about specific numbers. People who get calls from specific numbers can report their experience. Often you can find out from those reports what the caller's scam is. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
In article , Mayayana
wrote: | Thank you for the suggestions, which I shall soon try. I have never | gotten a spam call from a cellphone here in the USA, for some reason. | That's surprising. I wonder how you know. If your caller ID says private caller then it's a blocked landline. wrong. private means that caller id was blocked by the caller, regardless of phone type. that's *all*. But if it just says something like "Denver, CO" then it's a cellphone. wrong on that too. many cellphones have an area code database and will show a city/state when the number in not in your contacts. there is no cnam lookup with cellular, so unless the number is in your contacts list you will either see the city/state or just the number (if there's no database). I get mostly cellphone calls these days. you have no way to know what type of phone the caller is using from just the number. this is particularly true with number portability. a user can port a landline number to cellular or the other way around, which can mean that what *was* a landline last month might not be a landline anymore. and then there's voip, which is what most spammers use, typically offshore. They try to trick people into picking up. one common trick is to spoof the caller id to be from the same city or town as yours or somewhere nearby. for instance, someone living in manhattan is more likely to answer if the call is coming from somewhere else in new york city, versus say, lincoln, nebraska or seattle, washington. that also makes it harder to block because normally you will want to receive calls from people near you, whether it's family, friends or businesses. less so from some random city across the country. And as nospam said, they can also spoof. I occasionally get calls from myself. block your own phone number. however, that may interfere with voicemail access, depending on how that is set up. many voicemail systems check clid for access, which is obviously a security hole since that can be spoofed. It's got so bad that I don't pick up at all anymore unless I know who it is. If someone is calling from a cellphone and I don't recognize the number then they just have to leave a message. again, you have no way to know that. If you're interested in this for spam calls you might also find these two interesting: www.whocallsme.com www.whycall.me They list known information about specific numbers. People who get calls from specific numbers can report their experience. Often you can find out from those reports what the caller's scam is. i always do a search on a number and see what comes back. if it's associated with spam, it will usually come up with hits from the above sites as well as others. if not, then it might come up with the company or person. sometimes it really is just a wrong number. if it's spam, it gets blocked. if i see a pattern of spam calls from a certain area, i may block more than a single number, perhaps an entire exchange or sometimes even an entire area code. i also have a block on non-nanpa numbers, which covers any call with bogus clid, such as 000-0000 or an incorrect number of digits. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free".
On 6/18/2016 9:46 PM, Mayayana wrote:
| Thank you for the suggestions, which I shall soon try. I have never | gotten a spam call from a cellphone here in the USA, for some reason. | That's surprising. I wonder how you know. If your caller ID says private caller then it's a blocked landline. But if it just says something like "Denver, CO" then it's a cellphone. I get mostly cellphone calls these days. They try to trick people into picking up. And as nospam said, they can also spoof. I occasionally get calls from myself. It's got so bad that I don't pick up at all anymore unless I know who it is. If someone is calling from a cellphone and I don't recognize the number then they just have to leave a message. If you're interested in this for spam calls you might also find these two interesting: www.whocallsme.com www.whycall.me They list known information about specific numbers. People who get calls from specific numbers can report their experience. Often you can find out from those reports what the caller's scam is. The problem is that they are constantly changing numbers. The worst offender calls itself credit card services, or some variation of that name. As soon as I ask an intelligent question, they hang up. One time I decided to play the game and gave them all sorts of false information. I kept them on the phone for about 25 minutes. At the end of the conversation I told them I was not interested in their services. The person actually had the balls to get mad at me for "wasting his time." I must admit it was fun to waste HIS time. The idiot kept calling back about once a week. About 75% of the unrecognized calls I get are legitimate. -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Misleading bloggers and the use of "free". | Neil[_9_] | Digital Photography | 9 | June 21st 16 04:16 PM |
Free Nick Diaz "I GOT 5 ON IT" (Luniz vs Fugees Remix) | Art Deco[_3_] | Digital Photography | 0 | September 23rd 15 10:32 AM |
"Corset-Boi" Bob "Lionel Lauer" Larter has grown a "pair" and returned to AUK................ | \The Great One\ | Digital Photography | 0 | July 14th 09 12:04 AM |
"Suite of the imaginary beings" now complete for free download" | Gabriel | Digital Photography | 0 | December 17th 07 03:08 PM |
Free "digital photo stuff" as Birthday Gifts. | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 3 | August 2nd 07 05:05 PM |