There could still be hope! 4 a D7200!!!

In article , android
wrote:

A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of the information of
a half frame one, like in the EOS M or a quarter of a fullframe
one, like in a D810. Any other statement is pure
BS.

the only thing that's bs is what you said.

how much information a sensor captures is a function of more than just
its size.

nospam Wrote in message:
In article , android
wrote:

A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of the information of
a half frame one, like in the EOS M or a quarter of a fullframe
one, like in a D810. Any other statement is pure
BS.

the only thing that's bs is what you said.

how much information a sensor captures is a function of more than just
its size.

everything else equal and the size matter. as described in the
above.the physics are the same regardles of the size of the
sensor you know...
--
Bats can't tell us apart!


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

In article , android wrote:

android:
A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of the information
of a half frame one, like in the EOS M or a quarter of a
fullframe one, like in a D810. Any other statement is pure BS.

nospam:
the only thing that's bs is what you said.

how much information a sensor captures is a function of more than
just its size.

everything else equal and the size matter. as described in the
above.

Well, when it comes to cameras, everything else isn't always equal :-D

--
Sandman

In article ,
Sandman wrote:

android:
A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of the information
of a half frame one, like in the EOS M or a quarter of a
fullframe one, like in a D810. Any other statement is pure BS.

nospam:
the only thing that's bs is what you said.

how much information a sensor captures is a function of more than
just its size.

everything else equal and the size matter. as described in the
above.

Well, when it comes to cameras, everything else isn't always equal :-D

that's the point.

On 25/02/2015 20:59, android wrote:
[]
A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of the information of
a half frame one, like in the EOS M or a quarter of a fullframe
one, like in a D810. Any other statement is pure
BS.

No quibble, but there is also the question of how much information you
actually /need/ for any particular purpose. If you don't /need/
full-frame, then you can save on expense, weight and size.

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu

nospam Wrote in message:
In article ,
Sandman wrote:

android:
A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of the information
of a half frame one, like in the EOS M or a quarter of a
fullframe one, like in a D810. Any other statement is pure BS.

nospam:
the only thing that's bs is what you said.

how much information a sensor captures is a function of more than
just its size.

everything else equal and the size matter. as described in the
above.

Well, when it comes to cameras, everything else isn't always equal :-D

that's the point.

i've made mine, but sandy snippet it... it can be found about
three posts back.
--
Bats can't tell us apart!


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

David Taylor Wrote in message:
On 25/02/2015 20:59, android wrote:
[]
A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of the information of
a half frame one, like in the EOS M or a quarter of a fullframe
one, like in a D810. Any other statement is pure
BS.

No quibble, but there is also the question of how much information you
actually /need/ for any particular purpose. If you don't /need/
full-frame, then you can save on expense, weight and size.

I've got som nice imagery with Ixus cameras, but the EOS files are
way nicer...
--
Bats can't tell us apart!


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

In article , android wrote:

android:
A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of
the information of a half frame one, like in the EOS M or
a quarter of a fullframe one, like in a D810. Any other
statement is pure BS.

nospam:
the only thing that's bs is what you said.

how much information a sensor captures is a function of more
than just its size.

android:
everything else equal and the size matter. as described in the
above.

Sandman:
Well, when it comes to cameras, everything else isn't always
equal :-D

nospam:
that's the point.

i've made mine, but sandy snippet it... it can be found about three
posts back.

I snipped nothing in my post.


--
Sandman

Sandman Wrote in message:
In article , android wrote:

android:
A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half of
the information of a half frame one, like in the EOS M or
a quarter of a fullframe one, like in a D810. Any other
statement is pure BS.

nospam:
the only thing that's bs is what you said.

how much information a sensor captures is a function of more
than just its size.

android:
everything else equal and the size matter. as described in the
above.

Sandman:
Well, when it comes to cameras, everything else isn't always
equal :-D

nospam:
that's the point.

i've made mine, but sandy snippet it... it can be found about three
posts back.

I snipped nothing in my post.

Sure you did. Any interested party can read the thread backwards! :-p
--
Bats can't tell us apart!


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

In article , android wrote:

android:
A quarterframe sensor can only deliver half
of the information of a half frame one, like in the
EOS M or a quarter of a fullframe one, like in a D810.
Any other statement is pure BS.

nospam:
the only thing that's bs is what you said.

how much information a sensor captures is a function of
more than just its size.

android:
everything else equal and the size matter. as
described in the above.

Sandman:
Well, when it comes to cameras, everything else
isn't always equal :-D

nospam:
that's the point.

android:
i've made mine, but sandy snippet it... it can be found about
three posts back.

Sandman:
I snipped nothing in my post.

Sure you did.

So, we now have a claim from you that I snipped something you wrote, and a
counter claim from me that I did not. You have now repeated your claim without
supporting it, so here is the support from me:

This was your post:
This was my followup:

In which nothing of what you wrote was omitted or snipped. It is all there, and
your initial claim has now been proven to be incorrect. Your only option now is
to retract your claim and possibly apologize for making a claim about the actions
of another person that you didn't make sure was correct.

Any interested party can read the thread backwards!

Indeed they can. But I proved you incorrect even if they don't want to read the
thread "backwards".

Will you admit to having made an incorrect claim? We'll see.

--
Sandman