If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Long term damage to light meters?
Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time. Any basis for this? Cheers, Alan. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Long term damage to light meters?
In article , Alan Browne
wrote: Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time. Any basis for this? I've never heard anything ridiculous like that. Sounds like someone on bad drugs. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Long term damage to light meters?
The cells could break down, I suppose, if left in bright light for
extended periods... Alan Browne wrote: Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time. Any basis for this? Cheers, Alan. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Long term damage to light meters?
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:22:01 -0800, Randall Ainsworth
wrote: I've never heard anything ridiculous like that. Sounds like someone on bad drugs. This is probably true of selenium meters on vintage gear, but I don't recall if the damage is directly due to sunlight or from moisture absorbed by the crystal and then freed by heat. -- Michael Benveniste -- Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419. Use this email address only to submit mail for evaluation. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Long term damage to light meters?
I believe this is correct; selenium cell meters were always "on."
With CDS or newer type cells, this is not true. Michael Benveniste wrote: On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:22:01 -0800, Randall Ainsworth wrote: I've never heard anything ridiculous like that. Sounds like someone on bad drugs. This is probably true of selenium meters on vintage gear, but I don't recall if the damage is directly due to sunlight or from moisture absorbed by the crystal and then freed by heat. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Long term damage to light meters?
Alan Browne wrote:
Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time. Any basis for this? Selenium cells do wear off in bright light. In space applications (generating electricity for satellites) they lose 4% (IIRC) of their capacity annually. On ground it shouldn't be that bad. But still, you can't find old selenium meters that work correctly. Many older cameras with selenium cells had a flip on the cell, so you could cover it when not in use. CdS (photoresistor) and Si (photodiode) cells shouldn't have the same problem. They are based on different physical phenomena. -- Lassi |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Long term damage to light meters?
All right, Lassi. We Finns agree!
Lassi Hippeläinen wrote: Alan Browne wrote: Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time. Any basis for this? Selenium cells do wear off in bright light. In space applications (generating electricity for satellites) they lose 4% (IIRC) of their capacity annually. On ground it shouldn't be that bad. But still, you can't find old selenium meters that work correctly. Many older cameras with selenium cells had a flip on the cell, so you could cover it when not in use. CdS (photoresistor) and Si (photodiode) cells shouldn't have the same problem. They are based on different physical phenomena. -- Lassi |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Long term damage to light meters?
Lassi Hippeläinen wrote:
capacity annually. On ground it shouldn't be that bad. But still, you can't find old selenium meters that work correctly. Many older cameras I've got a Westonmaster V which works fine. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Long term damage to light meters?
Thanks, everyone, for your replies. In summary it would appear that this applies to the no longer common selenium meters. I do keep my meter in its case, normally, but occasionally leave it out in the "studio" where it might sit for a week or so before I put it away. Cheers, Alan. Alan Browne wrote: Some time ago, somewhere, somebody posted a claim that incident light meters should never be left out of their case for extended periods as ambient light would degrade their sensitivity over time. Any basis for this? -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Infinite depth of field? | Rich | Digital Photography | 1 | November 3rd 05 02:43 AM |
SB800 Nikon flash question (with D70) | larrylook | Digital Photography | 8 | January 16th 05 06:28 PM |
Question on Light Meters. | MATT WILLIAMS | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 6 | December 17th 04 01:16 PM |
Light meters, ratio lighting | Alan Browne | Photographing People | 5 | May 6th 04 05:27 PM |
How to determine distance from KEY light to subject | Phil Lamerton | Photographing People | 12 | April 27th 04 05:49 PM |