A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Blast to the past: Digital deliberately erasing the advancesof 100 years!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 16th 12, 06:25 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Laszlo Lebrun
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43
Default Blast to the past: Digital deliberately erasing the advancesof 100 years!

On 16/04/2012 08:38, Mxsmanic wrote:
Has anyone noticed this? People are taking more and more digital photographs,
but more and more of them have all sorts of stupid filters applied that
effectively restore all the defects of the worst photos of 70 years ago.


The two guys who made that popular are now, after only two years of
business, billionaires...

  #2  
Old April 17th 12, 01:23 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Blast to the past: Digital deliberately erasing the advances of 100 years!

In article , Laszlo Lebrun
wrote:

Has anyone noticed this? People are taking more and more digital
photographs,
but more and more of them have all sorts of stupid filters applied that
effectively restore all the defects of the worst photos of 70 years ago.


The two guys who made that popular are now, after only two years of
business, billionaires...


15 months and it sold for 1 billion. the company has 12 employees. one
founder will get $400mil when it vests. i don't know what the other one
will get or rest of the employees.

the question everyone is asking is *why*?
  #3  
Old April 17th 12, 06:47 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Laszlo Lebrun
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43
Default Blast to the past: Digital deliberately erasing the advancesof 100 years!

On 17/04/2012 02:23, nospam wrote:

the question everyone is asking is *why*?


A business model built on the stupidity of people has every chance to be
successful. The raw material is renewable ad libitum.
  #4  
Old April 17th 12, 07:16 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Blast to the past: Digital deliberately erasing the advances of 100 years!

In article alpine.DEB.2.02.1204171305080.1890@ryan-BigStorm, Ryan
McGinnis wrote:

The two guys who made that popular are now, after only two years of
business, billionaires...


15 months and it sold for 1 billion. the company has 12 employees. one
founder will get $400mil when it vests. i don't know what the other one
will get or rest of the employees.

the question everyone is asking is *why*?


Because the iPhone and Android platforms combined make up a large part of
photography equipment these days, and the Instagram app is one of the
most-used apps on these devices.


true, but how is it worth 1 billion?? that's a lot of money.

also, instagram was iphone only until a couple of weeks ago. the
android version just came out.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blast to the past: Digital deliberately erasing the advances of100 years! George Kerby Digital Photography 0 April 16th 12 04:19 PM
Blast from the past DMac Digital SLR Cameras 0 May 25th 09 10:55 PM
The Captain's cabin -- blast from the past! Julian. 35mm Photo Equipment 1 July 19th 07 10:47 AM
PAST Vs FUTURE, Digital? [email protected] Digital Photography 20 September 17th 06 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.