If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
aurora borealis
... and for a more unusual view of the Aurora Australis - without the
watermark - see: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOT...8&src=eoa-iotd http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ima...-58455_lrg.jpg Cheers, David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
aurora borealis
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:19:44 +0100, "David J Taylor"
wrote: .. and for a more unusual view of the Aurora Australis - without the watermark - see: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOT...8&src=eoa-iotd http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ima...-58455_lrg.jpg Cheers, David Damn, look at all the noise in that image. I get better images of aurora with my superzoom cameras. Someone should teach that idiot how to use a camera properly, there was no need for ISO6400 on aurora. Even dim aurora. Here's one I took up in BWCA (Boundary Waters Canoe Area) when exploring the region for a few months. (JPG degradation intentional.) http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4078/4888693180_aeea456d7e_z.jpg Climbed out of my sleeping bag to go take a **** in the middle of the night, and my dark-adapted eyes saw this rather dim aurora (note all the magnitude 4 and 5 stars easily visible through it). Sleepy and blurry-eyed, I grabbed the camera and handheld it on top of a stump to see what that superzoom could do. First time trying to capture aurora with that particular camera. I was impressed. Got tons more pics of aurora since then, after I realized how well it could image such dim subjects, noise-free, so easily. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
aurora borealis
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:21:42 -0500, Superzooms Still Win
wrote: : On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:19:44 +0100, "David J Taylor" : wrote: : : .. and for a more unusual view of the Aurora Australis - without the : watermark - see: : : http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOT...8&src=eoa-iotd : : http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ima...-58455_lrg.jpg : : Cheers, : David : : Damn, look at all the noise in that image. I get better images of aurora : with my superzoom cameras. Someone should teach that idiot how to use a : camera properly, there was no need for ISO6400 on aurora. Even dim aurora. : : Here's one I took up in BWCA (Boundary Waters Canoe Area) when exploring : the region for a few months. (JPG degradation intentional.) : : http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4078/4888693180_aeea456d7e_z.jpg : : Climbed out of my sleeping bag to go take a **** in the middle of the : night, and my dark-adapted eyes saw this rather dim aurora (note all the : magnitude 4 and 5 stars easily visible through it). Sleepy and blurry-eyed, : I grabbed the camera and handheld it on top of a stump to see what that : superzoom could do. First time trying to capture aurora with that : particular camera. I was impressed. Got tons more pics of aurora since : then, after I realized how well it could image such dim subjects, : noise-free, so easily. The only part of that yarn that I believe is that you once got up in the middle of the night to take a ****. Bob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
aurora borealis
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:18:08 -0400, Robert Coe wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:21:42 -0500, Superzooms Still Win wrote: : On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:19:44 +0100, "David J Taylor" : wrote: : : .. and for a more unusual view of the Aurora Australis - without the : watermark - see: : : http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOT...8&src=eoa-iotd : : http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ima...-58455_lrg.jpg : : Cheers, : David : : Damn, look at all the noise in that image. I get better images of aurora : with my superzoom cameras. Someone should teach that idiot how to use a : camera properly, there was no need for ISO6400 on aurora. Even dim aurora. : : Here's one I took up in BWCA (Boundary Waters Canoe Area) when exploring : the region for a few months. (JPG degradation intentional.) : : http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4078/4888693180_aeea456d7e_z.jpg : : Climbed out of my sleeping bag to go take a **** in the middle of the : night, and my dark-adapted eyes saw this rather dim aurora (note all the : magnitude 4 and 5 stars easily visible through it). Sleepy and blurry-eyed, : I grabbed the camera and handheld it on top of a stump to see what that : superzoom could do. First time trying to capture aurora with that : particular camera. I was impressed. Got tons more pics of aurora since : then, after I realized how well it could image such dim subjects, : noise-free, so easily. The only part of that yarn that I believe is that you once got up in the middle of the night to take a ****. Bob I'm sorry that your life hasn't been as adventurous and wondrous as mine. And that you haven't seen and photographed as amazing things as I have all my life. But that's your own sorry excuse of a life and pathetic fault. Try to not take out your regret of a life on those who haven't lived as sheltered and wuss of a life as you have lived. You've made that quite obvious. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
aurora borealis
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:33:20 -0500, George Kerby
wrote: On 8/14/10 3:18 PM, in article , "Robert Coe" wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:21:42 -0500, Superzooms Still Win wrote: : On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:19:44 +0100, "David J Taylor" : wrote: : : .. and for a more unusual view of the Aurora Australis - without the : watermark - see: : : http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOT...8&src=eoa-iotd : : http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ima.../ISS023-E-5845 5_lrg.jpg : : Cheers, : David : : Damn, look at all the noise in that image. I get better images of aurora : with my superzoom cameras. Someone should teach that idiot how to use a : camera properly, there was no need for ISO6400 on aurora. Even dim aurora. : : Here's one I took up in BWCA (Boundary Waters Canoe Area) when exploring : the region for a few months. (JPG degradation intentional.) : : http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4078/4888693180_aeea456d7e_z.jpg : : Climbed out of my sleeping bag to go take a **** in the middle of the : night, and my dark-adapted eyes saw this rather dim aurora (note all the : magnitude 4 and 5 stars easily visible through it). Sleepy and blurry-eyed, : I grabbed the camera and handheld it on top of a stump to see what that : superzoom could do. First time trying to capture aurora with that : particular camera. I was impressed. Got tons more pics of aurora since : then, after I realized how well it could image such dim subjects, : noise-free, so easily. The only part of that yarn that I believe is that you once got up in the middle of the night to take a ****. Bob Most likely he was so blind drunk that the Depends® flooded... I'm sorry that your life hasn't been as adventurous and wondrous as mine. And that you haven't seen and photographed as amazing things as I have all my life. But that's your own sorry excuse of a life and pathetic fault. Try to not take out your regret of a life on those who haven't lived as sheltered and wuss of a life as you have lived. You've made that quite obvious. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photographing Aurora ? | Bill Graham | 35mm Photo Equipment | 5 | January 14th 10 03:11 AM |
Photographing Aurora ? | Walter Banks | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | January 9th 10 09:00 PM |
Stereoscopic Aurora | tontoko | Digital Photography | 0 | December 27th 06 12:08 PM |
aurora | Don B | Digital Photography | 1 | January 24th 05 02:43 PM |