If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Physical reliability of mini-SD cards in a SD-carrier?
Steve wrote:
I have a 2GB mini SD card for my mobile phone that would be handy as temporary storage with other devices I use. How reliable are the full-size SD-carrier/adapters that would allow me to use it occasionally in my camera or as data backup for my laptop while out and about? Has anyone had a failure with such a combination? I've used the adapter and card for data and photos for years with no loss of data due to the adapter. The adapter is just a signal pass-through with no electronics: http://www.camerahacker.com/Digital/..._Adapter.shtml In other words, are the contacts reliable after repeated insertion of the card in the carrier/adapter? With the plummeting price of flash memory is it false economy to share cards between consumer products? Another £25 or so against losing an unrepeatable photo opportunity is probably trivial - yes? It is probably a false economy if you never have to share a single card with two or more devices. If you have two mobile devices that must share data, then you don't have much choice. As a supplementary, I recently bought a USB card reader rather than download pictures using the camera's (slower) USB umbilical interface. Is there a conclusive opinion on the robustness of reconnecting a mini USB cable to a camera rather than removing from, and re-inserting the SD card into the camera? It just strikes me that cables and sockets have better mechanical design than cards and card slots - and that the cable, if damaged, would be far simpler and cheaper to replace. I have tens of cards and several digital cameras, mobile devices, and computers. I have seen no failure with cables and card slots. I insert and remove cards all the time. I do have a few cards that just plainly died. So I've developed a philosophy to store photos and data on multiple cards, not just a single card: http://www.camerahacker.com/Digital/Eggs.shtml Chieh |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Physical reliability of mini-SD cards in a SD-carrier?
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 21:07:30 +0100, Steve wrote:
Good advice - I already backup my card(s) to a laptop on holidays where I can take it with me. What I want to do in addition is use a large SD card as second backup of the JPGs on the laptop when the card in the camera gets too full and I wipe that ready for more picture taking, if you follow me. The alternative is a stack of CD-Rs as my laptop can't burn DVDs. There a number of cameras (P&S and DSLR) that use two cards, usually one CF and one SD. When the just announced 8GB SD cards are available you could have a camera able to hold 16GB worth of pictures. They would hold as much as a stack of CD-Rs (two dozen) or about 3 1/2 DVDs. Some DSLRs can simultaneously store a RAW file on one card and a JPG on the other card. Because of file duplication you wouldn't be able to save as many unique images, but the card with the JPG files would be useful for quickly viewing images and also act as 'insurance' in case the main card used for the RAW files was damaged (in or out of the camera), lost or stolen. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Physical reliability of mini-SD cards in a SD-carrier?
ASAAR writes:
There a number of cameras (P&S and DSLR) that use two cards, usually one CF and one SD. When the just announced 8GB SD cards are available you could have a camera able to hold 16GB worth of pictures. Actually 24gb, you can get 16gb CF cards now. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Physical reliability of mini-SD cards in a SD-carrier?
On 06 Sep 2006 01:55:30 -0700, Paul Rubin
wrote: There a number of cameras (P&S and DSLR) that use two cards, usually one CF and one SD. When the just announced 8GB SD cards are available you could have a camera able to hold 16GB worth of pictures. Actually 24gb, you can get 16gb CF cards now. Neat! That helps equalize the number of shots each card can hold, assuming that RAW files saved on the CF card would be much larger than the JPG files saved on the SD card. I still like the idea of someday being able to use an SD card carrier that would allow a DSLR to hold 4, 6 or 8 SD cards. Not so much for the greater capacity, as for the much greater writing speed that could be possible using interleaved/simultaneous writes. This would be especially useful for nature or sports photography, where you could get long bursts of full resolution shots at video frame rates. Better have a good, fast, rugged, long lasting shutter though. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CF cards or photo bank? | Peter Wear | Digital SLR Cameras | 16 | June 16th 06 10:04 PM |
Reliability of off-brand memory cards | Zen Cohen | Digital Photography | 9 | May 15th 06 11:38 PM |
Dangers in copying pics from camera to computer | macca | Digital Photography | 184 | February 7th 06 11:40 PM |
Nikon D100 and Finepix S2 - suddenly Compact Flash Cards are not compatible | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 7 | January 21st 06 02:55 PM |
CF cards: Fit, finish, and ERRORS - Final Chapter | Frank ess | Digital Photography | 1 | February 19th 05 09:38 PM |