If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ufraw --size ignores 2nd dimension
The command:
ufraw-batch --out-type=jpeg --wb=camera --interpolation=ahd \ --size=3600,2000 --compression=85 dsc_0004.nef appears to ignore the "2000"; likewise if I change ',' to 'x'. The output size remains 3600,2387, as it is with the "3600" alone. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks, Mike. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ufraw --size ignores 2nd dimension
Mike -- Email Ignored wrote:
The command: ufraw-batch --out-type=jpeg --wb=camera --interpolation=ahd \ --size=3600,2000 --compression=85 dsc_0004.nef appears to ignore the "2000"; likewise if I change ',' to 'x'. The output size remains 3600,2387, as it is with the "3600" alone. Am I doing something wrong? The man page says the argument is "max(height,width)", but it is not at all obvious what that means. The argument SIZE is one single number, never a pair. The program is ignoring everything from the first non-numeric character in the argument (which could be called a bug because it should be clear that *any* non-numeric character is necessarily an indication that the argument is invalid). The SIZE number will be applied to whichever of the image height or width is the largest. Hence if you have a vertical image that is 1000x2000 (width x height) and use the argument "--size=300", the results will be an image that is 150x300. If the same argument is applied to a 2000x1000 image that is horizontal, the result will be output at 300x150. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ufraw --size ignores 2nd dimension
On Apr 6, 11:00 pm, (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:
Mike -- Email Ignored wrote: The command: ufraw-batch --out-type=jpeg --wb=camera --interpolation=ahd \ --size=3600,2000 --compression=85 dsc_0004.nef appears to ignore the "2000"; likewise if I change ',' to 'x'. The output size remains 3600,2387, as it is with the "3600" alone. Am I doing something wrong? The man page says the argument is "max(height,width)", but it is not at all obvious what that means. The argument SIZE is one single number, never a pair. The program is ignoring everything from the first non-numeric character in the argument (which could be called a bug because it should be clear that *any* non-numeric character is necessarily an indication that the argument is invalid). The SIZE number will be applied to whichever of the image height or width is the largest. Hence if you have a vertical image that is 1000x2000 (width x height) and use the argument "--size=300", the results will be an image that is 150x300. If the same argument is applied to a 2000x1000 image that is horizontal, the result will be output at 300x150. Yeah, I agree. That's a bug. Someone should file a bug report. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?grou...49&atid=709086 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ufraw with Nikon D40 | Fredrik Sandstrom | Digital Photography | 1 | July 3rd 07 10:58 PM |
ufraw on XP, no libgdk | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 3 | November 7th 06 04:06 PM |
Samsung Ignores Mac Users | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 10 | August 27th 06 11:46 PM |
UFraw - *.NEF file conversion | Frederick | Digital Photography | 0 | April 17th 05 03:51 AM |