If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
what I hate about film
I just looked at my 110, 126, and 35mm negs for family shots
my aunt wanted. all the negs besides 35mm were so small it was impossible to distinguish from one shot to the next if several were taken after each other. I am not surprised APS, 110, 126, and disk film died off. Why the hell would anyone want to store an APS canister with their photos instead of negs which are flat? APS film is smaller than 35mm and was a rip-off. Even on 35mm negs I couldnt tell who the hell the person was sometimes as I was missing the photo and the only way to see who that is is to develop the shot. The only reasons I dislike film photography a these awful negatives, film runs out too quickly, having to rewind film and then load new film which could cause me to miss a shot(s), exposure of film because camera opened, negs stick to each other and get stained and scratched, etc., inability to make multiple copies of original negs, (yes, photos could be scanned and burned to multiple CD-Rs) inability to preview shot taken&delete it, what I hate about digital: cameras are bigger than 35mm, P&S 6.1mp for $400 when I could get a film SLR for same price, (isnt 35mm 20-30mp?) P&S shutter lag & power on, (yes, there is burst mode, but for only 4 shots! no thanks) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Developwebsites" wrote in message ... The only reasons I dislike film photography a these awful negatives, film runs out too quickly, having to rewind film and then load new film which could cause me to miss a shot(s), exposure of film because camera opened, negs stick to each other and get stained and scratched, etc., inability to make multiple copies of original negs, (yes, photos could be scanned and burned to multiple CD-Rs) inability to preview shot taken&delete it, Yes, you are completely right! Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to place an online order for some film. Be seeing you! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Developwebsites" wrote in message ... The only reasons I dislike film photography a these awful negatives, film runs out too quickly, having to rewind film and then load new film which could cause me to miss a shot(s), exposure of film because camera opened, negs stick to each other and get stained and scratched, etc., inability to make multiple copies of original negs, (yes, photos could be scanned and burned to multiple CD-Rs) inability to preview shot taken&delete it, Yes, you are completely right! Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to place an online order for some film. Be seeing you! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Film sucks. It's so forgiving that you actually were able to use all
those stuck together little strips of film in goofball Consuelo Consumo formats and print recognizable images. It's too bad you didn't have electronic images back then, because they'd have been on tape cartridges or 9 track open reel or 8 inch or even 5 1/4 inch (hard sectored maybe) floppies and you would have had to go to a service bureau and pay money to even see if you had anything, and you'd have been too cheap, and those ****ty snapshots would have been completely forgotten and you'd have thrown them out. In 50 years, film that is 50 years old today, will often if not always be more usable than digital images taken today. If I gave you the _video tape_ from my sister's seventh grade play-which I still have-and you wanted to watch it, what would you do? It's on U-Matic. Know what that is?? Consuelo Consumo. She's really Caroline ****ley in a Best Buy jacket, you know. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Film sucks. It's so forgiving that you actually were able to use all
those stuck together little strips of film in goofball Consuelo Consumo formats and print recognizable images. It's too bad you didn't have electronic images back then, because they'd have been on tape cartridges or 9 track open reel or 8 inch or even 5 1/4 inch (hard sectored maybe) floppies and you would have had to go to a service bureau and pay money to even see if you had anything, and you'd have been too cheap, and those ****ty snapshots would have been completely forgotten and you'd have thrown them out. In 50 years, film that is 50 years old today, will often if not always be more usable than digital images taken today. If I gave you the _video tape_ from my sister's seventh grade play-which I still have-and you wanted to watch it, what would you do? It's on U-Matic. Know what that is?? Consuelo Consumo. She's really Caroline ****ley in a Best Buy jacket, you know. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is it Copal or copal? Then what is it? | Nick Zentena | Large Format Photography Equipment | 14 | July 27th 04 03:31 AM |
ALDEN-74 BULK FILM LOADER - This will be in 35mm and darkroom and no other postings | Richard Knoppow | In The Darkroom | 0 | July 14th 04 09:05 PM |
Insane new TSA rule for film inspection | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 94 | June 23rd 04 05:17 AM |
The first film of the Digital Revolution is here.... | Todd Bailey | Film & Labs | 0 | May 27th 04 08:12 AM |
Sixty-year-old undeveloped film | Mark | In The Darkroom | 13 | February 22nd 04 07:30 AM |