If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
R.I.P. Kodachrome
frank wrote:
Right. Its not only Kodachrome, friend of mine does prints from slides. Can't get it shipped from NY due to shipper restrictions, he finally found a source in the UK to do it. Last I checked, the UK had a fairly active community of photgraphers who thought that silver based photgraphy was something worth doing. My expectation is that most of the labs that print slides will just scan them and do digital print. If it's done on silver based paper then it is far better than an inkjet print. I doubt that it's as good as a direct optical print, but that won't last forever, scanning and printing technology keep getting better. Why not spin off the film and paper business to some subsidiary instead of killing it and saying we're going digital and producing the crap cameras nobody uses. They did. Remember when they went from the old Plus-X, etc to the new? What they did was cut a deal with Lucky in China where Lucky bought the old production equipment, formulas, training and assistance from Kodak. Kodak modified what products they kept to be produced on the their existing equipment which was set up for t-grained color film. Unfortunately it seems that Lucky did not perform as expected, at least outside of China, and their export film is nothing like the Kodak film. Kodak pulled out of that deal. Personaly, I don't think that made a change at all, Lucky produced mediocre film because that was what they were able to produce. Eventually they will produce film as good as or better than Kodak's, but it will take time. If you figure that it takes 5 years for them to catch up, in 10 they will be producing a better product at a lower price than Kodak. It seems their business model is make it hard to find, drop processors and plants, then say, there's no demand and kill it. My town has no camera store. Its that way in lots of places. Only place to buy film is Wal Mart except online. You have a much selection there if you're the last guy to get to the pile of C rations.... That was not Kodak's doing. Camera stores closed down because people no longer went to them to buy a camera and film. They bought them online and if they wanted to buy them in person, they went to Wal-Mart because they were cheap. It was not the first time, I remember when K-Mart started selling Canon AE-1 Program cameras for $115, and suddenly everyone had an SLR. By the late 1980's most Camera chain stores in the US were selling extended warranties as their main source of income. The market for cameras and film had become so cutthroat that they had to meet or beat any price including the discounters just to make a sale. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
R.I.P. Kodachrome | Max Perl | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | June 23rd 09 07:39 AM |
Kodachrome | ChrisQuayle | 35mm Photo Equipment | 39 | December 19th 06 10:57 PM |
Kodachrome and X-pan? | mr. chip | Film & Labs | 7 | November 18th 04 03:50 PM |
Kodachrome and X-pan | Stuart Droker | Film & Labs | 0 | November 9th 04 10:24 PM |
Kodachrome 120? | Lunaray | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 5 | February 24th 04 12:13 AM |