If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
Guys,
I've read a couple of opinions on the movie mode included in the new Nikon D90, and that many expect this to be a feature common to dSLRs moving forward. The opinions center on increased use of movie mode by action photographers, and editors then picking out the ideal photo from the movie clip. Knowing less than nothing about the movie mode, will this be a practical application for the amateur user? I'm asking as I'm really on the fence re the D90 vs. D300. I'm currently using a D70, and have been really happy w/ it. New features in a camera that interest me are the 3" LCD, ADR (or as Nikon calls it Active D-Lighting), Live View (how much I'll use it I'm not sure at this point). I know both the D90 and D300 have these features. What I'm not sure about is how much I'd use the movie mode in the D90, unless as I mentioned above the ability to pull stills from a video clip is practical. Jeff |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
Jeff Heyen wrote:
Guys, I've read a couple of opinions on the movie mode included in the new Nikon D90, and that many expect this to be a feature common to dSLRs moving forward. The opinions center on increased use of movie mode by action photographers, and editors then picking out the ideal photo from the movie clip. Knowing less than nothing about the movie mode, will this be a practical application for the amateur user? Not with the D90. Its movie mode is at a much lower resolution. The Casio EX-F1 does attempt to do something just like that, though. -- Ray Fischer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
"Jeff Heyen" wrote in message
. .. I've read a couple of opinions on the movie mode included in the new Nikon D90, and that many expect this to be a feature common to dSLRs moving forward. The opinions center on increased use of movie mode by action photographers, and editors then picking out the ideal photo from the movie clip. Knowing less than nothing about the movie mode, will this be a practical application for the amateur user? I'm asking as I'm really on the fence re the D90 vs. D300. I'm currently using a D70, and have been really happy w/ it. New features in a camera that interest me are the 3" LCD, ADR (or as Nikon calls it Active D-Lighting), Live View (how much I'll use it I'm not sure at this point). I know both the D90 and D300 have these features. What I'm not sure about is how much I'd use the movie mode in the D90, unless as I mentioned above the ability to pull stills from a video clip is practical. I am coming around to the idea of video on an SLR. I wasn't sure about having a movie mode initially because I would prefer to have other new features to improve still photography instead, such as built in ND filters (low ISO), auto focus points positioned in more useable places for when shooting moving subjects, etc. Also, when I first heard of a movie mode I visualised the type of movie clips you get from mobile phones and P&S cameras, which are pretty diabolical. If I want to shoot video, then I would use my camcorder. That said, I will only take either the still camera or the camcorder depending what I am planning to shoot, because juggling between the two doesn't work very well in practice. As I prefer still photography, this means that my camcorder gets left at home most of the time. So, it will do no harm to have a video function, after all you don't have to use it. What will be interesting is whether the video that is produced will be on the same/similar level as what you get out of a camcorder. If it's the same quality that you get out of P&S and mobile phones, then it would be a feature that I would never use. If it's on par with a camcorder, then it would be a feature that could have it's benefits. It will be interesting to know what happens to the noise levels in still images if you have been using it to shoot video beforehand and then switch to still. As for action photographers using the video on this camera instead of stills, I doubt it because of the low resolution. If they were going to do this, then they would use a proper video camera with a higher resolution instead (which I have seen paps using before). For this type of use I wonder if we will start to see more of the likes of this appearinghttp://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/0...es-aim-a.html). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
"Paul" wrote in message
... As for action photographers using the video on this camera instead of stills, I doubt it because of the low resolution. If they were going to do this, then they would use a proper video camera with a higher resolution instead (which I have seen paps using before). For this type of use I wonder if we will start to see more of the likes of this appearinghttp://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/0...es-aim-a.html). Sorry, I'm going to go slightly OT from the OP. Further to the above link regarding the Red DSLR killer, I also came across this (http://www.flickr.com/groups/twip/di...607215152834/). In this post it says "As Nikon and Canon release their 720P and 1080P, respectively, DSLRs with video capture... ". Where did they get the 1080P from? Has something been leaked about the 5D replacement? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
"Paul" wrote in message ... "Jeff Heyen" wrote in message . .. I've read a couple of opinions on the movie mode included in the new Nikon D90, and that many expect this to be a feature common to dSLRs moving forward. The opinions center on increased use of movie mode by action photographers, and editors then picking out the ideal photo from the movie clip. Knowing less than nothing about the movie mode, will this be a practical application for the amateur user? I'm asking as I'm really on the fence re the D90 vs. D300. I'm currently using a D70, and have been really happy w/ it. New features in a camera that interest me are the 3" LCD, ADR (or as Nikon calls it Active D-Lighting), Live View (how much I'll use it I'm not sure at this point). I know both the D90 and D300 have these features. What I'm not sure about is how much I'd use the movie mode in the D90, unless as I mentioned above the ability to pull stills from a video clip is practical. I am coming around to the idea of video on an SLR. I wasn't sure about having a movie mode initially because I would prefer to have other new features to improve still photography instead, such as built in ND filters (low ISO), auto focus points positioned in more useable places for when shooting moving subjects, etc. Also, when I first heard of a movie mode I visualised the type of movie clips you get from mobile phones and P&S cameras, which are pretty diabolical. If I want to shoot video, then I would use my camcorder. That said, I will only take either the still camera or the camcorder depending what I am planning to shoot, because juggling between the two doesn't work very well in practice. As I prefer still photography, this means that my camcorder gets left at home most of the time. So, it will do no harm to have a video function, after all you don't have to use it. What will be interesting is whether the video that is produced will be on the same/similar level as what you get out of a camcorder. If it's the same quality that you get out of P&S and mobile phones, then it would be a feature that I would never use. If it's on par with a camcorder, then it would be a feature that could have it's benefits. It will be interesting to know what happens to the noise levels in still images if you have been using it to shoot video beforehand and then switch to still. As for action photographers using the video on this camera instead of stills, I doubt it because of the low resolution. If they were going to do this, then they would use a proper video camera with a higher resolution instead (which I have seen paps using before). For this type of use I wonder if we will start to see more of the likes of this appearinghttp://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/0...es-aim-a.html). I have a 2 year old Sony Cybershot Point & Shoot Digital Camera with movie mode. I can shoot up to 60 minutes of video. The results are good enough to produce as an edited ( using Adobe Premier Elements) excellent DVD's in sound. The quality (video & sound) is good enough to show on my 19" monitor or 20" TV. It has a Zeiss Vario-Tessar 6.7-20.1mm lens. The Nikon D90 has got to be far superior to my old Sony with its tiny CMOS. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
"Frank Arthur" wrote in message
... I have a 2 year old Sony Cybershot Point & Shoot Digital Camera with movie mode. I can shoot up to 60 minutes of video. The results are good enough to produce as an edited ( using Adobe Premier Elements) excellent DVD's in sound. The quality (video & sound) is good enough to show on my 19" monitor or 20" TV. It has a Zeiss Vario-Tessar 6.7-20.1mm lens. The Nikon D90 has got to be far superior to my old Sony with its tiny CMOS. Just found an amateur clip. Image quality looks OK. (http://guykawasaki.typepad.com/DSC_0018.AVI) (32MB) You are however limited by 6 minutes of recording in HD. Also, the focus locks during recording, which is a bit of a shame, especially if you are using a big aperture lens. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:36:34 +0100, Paul wrote:
I can shoot up to 60 minutes of video. The results are good enough to produce as an edited ( using Adobe Premier Elements) excellent DVD's in sound. The quality (video & sound) is good enough to show on my 19" monitor or 20" TV. It has a Zeiss Vario-Tessar 6.7-20.1mm lens. The Nikon D90 has got to be far superior to my old Sony with its tiny CMOS. Just found an amateur clip. Image quality looks OK. (http://guykawasaki.typepad.com/DSC_0018.AVI) (32MB) You are however limited by 6 minutes of recording in HD. Also, the focus locks during recording, which is a bit of a shame, especially if you are using a big aperture lens. Rarely is more than 5 consecutive minutes of video really needed. If shooting your own personal documentary, the next 5 minute clip can be started almost immediately, or by shooting at less than HD resolution, longer clips are possible, up to the same 60 minutes according to the D90's manual. Also, are you sure that the focus locks? You may not be able to have the camera AF but MF should work, sacrificing convenience for control. Depending on the lens, many should also be able to override the lens's AF switch position and focus manually while shooting video. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
"ASAAR" wrote in message
... Just found an amateur clip. Image quality looks OK. (http://guykawasaki.typepad.com/DSC_0018.AVI) (32MB) You are however limited by 6 minutes of recording in HD. Also, the focus locks during recording, which is a bit of a shame, especially if you are using a big aperture lens. Rarely is more than 5 consecutive minutes of video really needed. If shooting your own personal documentary, the next 5 minute clip can be started almost immediately, or by shooting at less than HD resolution, longer clips are possible, up to the same 60 minutes according to the D90's manual. Also, are you sure that the focus locks? You may not be able to have the camera AF but MF should work, sacrificing convenience for control. Depending on the lens, many should also be able to override the lens's AF switch position and focus manually while shooting video. You are quite right with both of your comments. But, why have a 6 minute limit? What if for example you are shooting an interview, a speech, a music/theatrical scene, etc. or even a 'special' home movie? Why the restriction? Surely it's not to allow the sensor to cool down if you can start recording again immediately? Yeah, poor choice of words with saying lock. Of course you can manually focus, but again not very good. I would be quite an art zooming and manually focusing your kid playing football for example, especially if you are using a fast lens opened up. Yeah, I know, it's not a video camera, but would be nice if they thought about the above two limitations more. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
$1000 USD to shoot YouTube vids?
Here is the new 30 mp Pentax dSLR/HD108p http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=29385464 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
D90 & Movie Mode
For the vast majority of high quality amateur work you will not see a
difference in image qulaity regardless of sensor in the Nikon line-up (excepting at high ISOs) from cameras subsequent to the D70. **** and moan but that is a fact because of the way most amateurs shoot and print. However when you look through the D200/80/90/300 the difference in the viewing systems will justify any upgrade because the D70 has such a small, dim viewfinder. I have little interest in video per se but occasionally use my P&S or EVF for that purpose. Hence the inclusion of movie mode in the D90 may get me to buy this thing when I swore I would sit out at least two upgrade cycles. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
D90 D-Movie Mode | Maurice Blanchard[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | September 13th 08 09:19 PM |
D90 D-Movie Mode | Maurice Blanchard[_2_] | Digital Photography | 3 | September 9th 08 02:05 PM |
D90 D-Movie Mode | Maurice Blanchard[_2_] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | September 9th 08 02:05 PM |
640 x 480 (VGA) @ 15fps Vs 30 fps (Movie Mode) | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 7 | February 22nd 05 01:29 AM |
best movie mode | rt | Digital Photography | 14 | December 15th 04 12:27 AM |