If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quality of Adobe Premiere Elements slideshow output
I get low slide show image quality and shimmering effects on the edges
of all the higher contrast demarcations within most stills. Absolutely would covet your help that I may achieve full screen slideshow quality that matches the beautiful source stills. I'm an experienced photographer, Photoshop Elements editor, a power user of a hefty XP machine (knowing that a Mac would be better) and eventually want to incorporate digital camcorder motion video. I've been ransacking the Adobe Premiere online help documentation and this forum. I imported a few dozen 90dpi 1280x960 pngs (from 35mm scanned/edited transparencies and a 3mpixel camera) into Premier Elements, created average 2 second timings with fade transitions, added music, both enabled and disabled "optimize stills", both enabled and disabled "flicker removal", both enabled and disabled frame blend speed changes, outputed to avi for hard disk playback in WMP10 (also works with the newest Cyberlink PowerDVD program). Even tried some psd, tiff, and jpg images. WMV slideshow output from Photoshop Elements 3.0 DOES provide high quality images, but you can't customize the image/music timing as much as Premiere Elements and exploit other creative features (though it looks like you can time the images to within a tenth of a second). Are there any quality advantages with Ulead Studio 8, Pinnacle Studio 9, or Pro Show Gold? There certainly aren't superior results with MovieMaker or PhotoStory3. I achieve extremely high image quality and nice transitions with Powerpoint, but it doesn't create an single file with embedded music nor can you precisely synchronize the music with the image transitions. Adobe told me that Premier wouldn't produce higher quality than Premier Elements. I wasn't willing to shell out $40 minimum to receive suggestions from their technical support, even though there would be no cost to discuss global issues with Premier Elements. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adobe Photoshop Elements 3.0 | Joseph Meehan | Digital Photography | 24 | November 16th 04 05:28 PM |
First experiences with Adobe's DNG Converter | Gene Palmiter | Digital Photography | 80 | November 5th 04 10:55 AM |
Recommendations for online "labs" that do high quality output. lightjet, rowe (?), lambda, etc | Some Dude | In The Darkroom | 0 | August 19th 04 11:46 PM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | 35mm Photo Equipment | 274 | July 30th 04 12:26 AM |
Adobe Elements Question | DonB | Digital Photography | 6 | June 24th 04 07:51 AM |