![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() As part of documenting her work, my wife takes photos of patients' skin. In a dimly-lit room, she photographs the part of interest along with a paper ruler and a slip of paper containing the particulars. For this task she has been using a $90 Canon A-series P&S, using flash, in full auto mode. The A-series was of particular convenience value because of the ability to instantly replace dead AA batteries with fresh ones while doing rounds. Recently she asked if I had an old camera to spare, as she now has an assistant and thus a need for a second camera. Jumping at the excuse to upgrade something, I volunteered my trusty dusty Canon A710. I told her it should do as well or better, and also used disposable batteries. Set it for full automatic and matched the settings of the older P&S as best I could. A week or so later, she said "I still need a camera for work". When asked what was wrong with the A710, she told me the paper ruler and tag were so washed out that the text could not be read. So in her office I tried both of them side by side, using my arm and a paper memo as test subjects. Sure enough, using flash and full auto, the A710 could not properly expose the skin AND the paper, where the el-cheapo did just fine. I experimented with various metering modes (evaluative, spot, center-weighted) but in flash mode this seems to make little difference. I tried dialing down the exposure compensation a couple of stops, but then the skin was too dark. Worse, she told me that she doesn't have time to fiddle with settings, she wants to point and shoot, period, as she does with the el-cheapo. Why can the el-cheapo handle this situation but the better-equipped model fails? I suspect the flash on the A710 is more powerful and, at close range, simply produces too much light. Suggestions? I'm going to try attenuating the flash by taping something over it as my next step. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How should I have shot this picture so it isn't so washed out? | SHAKY HANDS | Digital Photography | 8 | August 1st 07 06:34 PM |
Washed out signs | Bob M | Digital Photography | 11 | November 6th 06 06:27 PM |
Please, why is sky washed out? | Celcius | Digital Photography | 54 | June 9th 06 05:08 PM |
External flash with Ewa-Marine housing: too close to the body? | Dmitri | Digital Photography | 5 | September 1st 04 05:02 AM |
Photo lab washed out images... what can I do? | Mike Jenkins | Film & Labs | 19 | August 23rd 04 07:09 PM |