If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Siddhartha Jain" wrote in message
oups.com... Why not put another small CCD/CMOS sensor that moves in place between the mirror and viewfinder's optical path when the movie mode is switched on? Just wondering aloud, don't really know much about dSLR construction. Because it would probably be much more cost effective to pocket a P&S camera instead. ) Dave |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
george wrote:
What a lower fps rate on a higher resolution camera (50% higher) proves is that memory cost would result in a significantly higher price and likely limit the camera's appeal to a much broader market most of which isn't professional sports photographers. No, what it proves is that the small extra cost for more high speed buffer memory would result in decreased sales for much more expensive Canon models. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
David Geesaman wrote:
"Siddhartha Jain" wrote in message oups.com... Why not put another small CCD/CMOS sensor that moves in place between the mirror and viewfinder's optical path when the movie mode is switched on? Just wondering aloud, don't really know much about dSLR construction. Because it would probably be much more cost effective to pocket a P&S camera instead. ) Dave Not sure about cost effectiveness but sure lets you sell a dSLR, P&S and handycam to the same guy ;-) - Siddhartha |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Siddhartha Jain" wrote in message
Was it really necessary to kill the onboard flash? YES! Finally you don't have to pay for something you'll never use. -- Mark Photos, Ideas & Opinions http://www.marklauter.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Beach Bum wrote:
"Siddhartha Jain" wrote in message Was it really necessary to kill the onboard flash? YES! Finally you don't have to pay for something you'll never use. I was wondering how they got the price so low. :-) -Mike |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Siddhartha Jain" wrote in message
ups.com... Alan Browne wrote: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos5d/ While not "cheap" at an MSRP of US$3300, the 2 Lb 5D does promise a lot: Finally a spot meter. Full frame. Large monitor. 0.3EV ISO steps. A few "odd" things: 6 "invisible assist AF points" within the spot meter circle... 1/200 sync. (v. 1/250 in the 20D, not that important). Viewfinder is 0.71x, but considering "full frame" that's understandable, should be bright. Dumped the AF assist light (or was it via the built in flash in the 20D?) 3 fps v 5 in the 20D. (Proving again that high fps is not that important) Was it really necessary to kill the onboard flash? Seems like an *afforadable* FF dSLR (when the price drops) but has it been crippled with 3fps rate and lack of AF assist? Will photo journalists be ok with that low frame rate? And where is the movie mode? ;-) - Siddhartha Onboard flash may have affected the viewfinder coverage, and most of the users won't miss it, we have shoe mount or off camera flashes, anyway. Frame rate is similar to 1Ds mkII, so that may be a function of the sensor size, not a "crippling." Canon probably feels it doesn't need AF assist, if you're shooting in low light, you'll probably have either a fast lens, or a flash mounted. Canon's flashes have their own AF assist lights, and better ones than are on the cameras. That being said, the old A2 had a very nice AF assist light, near IR, that worked very well. Canon hasn't produced one as nice since. And don't expect the price to drop much, or soon. Look at the price of the 1Ds mkII, not much change there, percentage wise, the 1D mkII has dropped, what, 200 bucks? 5%? As has the 20D, a year after its intro. -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"David Littlewood" wrote in message
... In article , Steve Franklin writes And where is the movie mode? ;-) - Siddhartha You know....I know you probably said that tongue in cheek...but I would love to have movie mode on the D70. To me it doesn't make the camera any less serious....and it's a bloody handy thing to have.... In fact, I would imagine that it would be huge selling point for any dSlr I have a lot of friends overseas and would love to be able to shoot a few little movies and send them... It should also help to solve my problems in getting precise focussing in using my 10D for photomicrography. With a poor screen (for manual focussing) and the inability to open the shutter to focus from the DV output, it really isn't as useful as it ideally should be. David -- David Littlewood The 5D is supposed to have an optional screen made for critical focusing... -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Skip M wrote:
"Siddhartha Jain" wrote in message ups.com... Alan Browne wrote: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos5d/ While not "cheap" at an MSRP of US$3300, the 2 Lb 5D does promise a lot: Finally a spot meter. Full frame. Large monitor. 0.3EV ISO steps. A few "odd" things: 6 "invisible assist AF points" within the spot meter circle... 1/200 sync. (v. 1/250 in the 20D, not that important). Viewfinder is 0.71x, but considering "full frame" that's understandable, should be bright. Dumped the AF assist light (or was it via the built in flash in the 20D?) 3 fps v 5 in the 20D. (Proving again that high fps is not that important) Was it really necessary to kill the onboard flash? Seems like an *afforadable* FF dSLR (when the price drops) but has it been crippled with 3fps rate and lack of AF assist? Will photo journalists be ok with that low frame rate? And where is the movie mode? ;-) - Siddhartha Onboard flash may have affected the viewfinder coverage, and most of the users won't miss it, we have shoe mount or off camera flashes, anyway. Frame rate is similar to 1Ds mkII, so that may be a function of the sensor size, not a "crippling." Canon probably feels it doesn't need AF assist, if you're shooting in low light, you'll probably have either a fast lens, or a flash mounted. Canon's flashes have their own AF assist lights, and better ones than are on the cameras. That being said, the old A2 had a very nice AF assist light, near IR, that worked very well. Canon hasn't produced one as nice since. After owning a dSLR for a year, I found my preference is to enjoy the flexibility offered by a dSLR alongwith the superior low-noise sensor but without carrying too much baggage around. So no onboard flash means no flash for me as I am very less likely to carry an external flash around. Ofcourse, your usage and preferences may vary. - Siddhartha |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
In article TEbPe.2493$sw6.523@fed1read05, Skip M
writes "David Littlewood" wrote in message ... In article , Steve Franklin writes And where is the movie mode? ;-) - Siddhartha You know....I know you probably said that tongue in cheek...but I would love to have movie mode on the D70. To me it doesn't make the camera any less serious....and it's a bloody handy thing to have.... In fact, I would imagine that it would be huge selling point for any dSlr I have a lot of friends overseas and would love to be able to shoot a few little movies and send them... It should also help to solve my problems in getting precise focussing in using my 10D for photomicrography. With a poor screen (for manual focussing) and the inability to open the shutter to focus from the DV output, it really isn't as useful as it ideally should be. David -- David Littlewood The 5D is supposed to have an optional screen made for critical focusing... Yes, I saw that. However, they mention (IIRC) a choice of 3, and I have a nasty feeling they will be something with split image wedges and microprisms. These are in my experience little better; what is required for critical focus in the kind of applications I have in mind is the old "I" screen, with a clear centre spot and cross hair. This is the only one which is really satisfactory on my 1n. Also, the advantage of focussing from the sensor is that it eliminates any possible errors from misalignment between the sensor and the focussing screen. The disadvantage may be lower resolution of the video output. At the moment, all too often, I have to fiddle around with focus bracketing. The margin for error in photomicrography is as near zero as makes no odds. David -- David Littlewood |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
In the "white paper:"
http://www.robgalbraith.com/public_f...hite_Paper.pdf it shows all three screens, the Ee-S Sharp focusing Screen shows not split image, and the write up says it has "finer microlenses than other two types, meant for lenses f2.8 or faster, with a steeper-than-normal parabola of focus for easier manual focusing." -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com "David Littlewood" wrote in message ... In article TEbPe.2493$sw6.523@fed1read05, Skip M writes "David Littlewood" wrote in message ... In article , Steve Franklin writes And where is the movie mode? ;-) - Siddhartha You know....I know you probably said that tongue in cheek...but I would love to have movie mode on the D70. To me it doesn't make the camera any less serious....and it's a bloody handy thing to have.... In fact, I would imagine that it would be huge selling point for any dSlr I have a lot of friends overseas and would love to be able to shoot a few little movies and send them... It should also help to solve my problems in getting precise focussing in using my 10D for photomicrography. With a poor screen (for manual focussing) and the inability to open the shutter to focus from the DV output, it really isn't as useful as it ideally should be. David -- David Littlewood The 5D is supposed to have an optional screen made for critical focusing... Yes, I saw that. However, they mention (IIRC) a choice of 3, and I have a nasty feeling they will be something with split image wedges and microprisms. These are in my experience little better; what is required for critical focus in the kind of applications I have in mind is the old "I" screen, with a clear centre spot and cross hair. This is the only one which is really satisfactory on my 1n. Also, the advantage of focussing from the sensor is that it eliminates any possible errors from misalignment between the sensor and the focussing screen. The disadvantage may be lower resolution of the video output. At the moment, all too often, I have to fiddle around with focus bracketing. The margin for error in photomicrography is as near zero as makes no odds. David -- David Littlewood |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If the Canon 5D is real... | Rox-off | Digital SLR Cameras | 322 | August 22nd 05 10:23 PM |
Comments on Maxxum D7 spec | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 23 | September 18th 04 05:03 AM |
Canon EOS 10D - Is This For Real! | Eddie | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 3 | September 11th 04 01:53 AM |
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) | Steven M. Scharf | Digital Photography | 104 | September 3rd 04 01:01 PM |
CANON - The Great Innovator (was: CANON – The Great Pretender) | Steven M. Scharf | 35mm Photo Equipment | 92 | September 3rd 04 01:01 PM |