Death of a 20D

Randall Ainsworth wrote:

In article , Alan Browne
wrote:


The Sigma SD9/10 are not as bad as we like to harp, and Sigma really screwed
up
by offering it in a proprietary mount. Had they offered it in Canon, Nikon,
Minolta, Pentax, Olympus,... mounts, they would have really cleaned out a
slice
of the market (esp. Minolta and Olympus).


No, they would still have sucked because of their oddball technology
resulting in strange colors.

Most images I've seen from the SD9 have had perfectly acceptable colors. The
only odd thing I've seen on SD9 images is strange aliasing in diagonal objects
.... and that only at full res on screen. Having said that it's not a camera I
would buy. I was only pointing out that Sigma really blew it by making it in a
proprietary mount.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- [SI] rulz: http://www.aliasimages.com/si/rulz.html
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.