If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Minilab negative scanning resolution
When I have film processed I get just the CD - no prints (usually).
Recently I took some negatives to the processor (using Kodak equipment) and asked them to do a high resolution scan and put the results on CD. All they can do is standard scan - about 1 MB jpg file. This is fine for a 4"x6" print, ok for a 5"x7" print, but not good enough for a 8"x10" print. Is this true of all minilab equipment, or is there something they can do but may not know about (the workers are usually min. wage people)? Ironically, they can scan the negative and produce a very nice 8"x10" print, but they can't get the data to CD. I know that there are places I can get scanning done, but that means mailing negatives, more time, more money, etc. Thanks, Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Minilab negative scanning resolution
In article ,
dave wrote: When I have film processed I get just the CD - no prints (usually). Recently I took some negatives to the processor (using Kodak equipment) and asked them to do a high resolution scan and put the results on CD. All they can do is standard scan - about 1 MB jpg file. This is fine for a 4"x6" print, ok for a 5"x7" print, but not good enough for a 8"x10" print. Is this true of all minilab equipment, or is there something they can do but may not know about (the workers are usually min. wage people)? Ironically, they can scan the negative and produce a very nice 8"x10" print, but they can't get the data to CD. I know that there are places I can get scanning done, but that means mailing negatives, more time, more money, etc. Thanks, Dave Minilabs are the ultimate in lowest-common-denomator equipment. They are designed and built to serve the 80% or so of the public who wants nothing more than 4" x 6" prints. If you are at a dedicated place like Ritz Camera they have higher-end scaners behind the counter to produce their roll-fed inkjet large-format prints. If you want something more usable than a standard minilab scan (low-rez) on a CD you will have to expect to pay more. Not nearly as much as a drum scan, of course, but more than the $0.10/picture they charge for minilab crap. Don't expect this from Costco, Walmart, etc. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Minilab negative scanning resolution
On 10-12-18 21:01 , dave wrote:
When I have film processed I get just the CD - no prints (usually). Recently I took some negatives to the processor (using Kodak equipment) and asked them to do a high resolution scan and put the results on CD. All they can do is standard scan - about 1 MB jpg file. This is fine for a 4"x6" print, ok for a 5"x7" print, but not good enough for a 8"x10" print. Is this true of all minilab equipment, or is there something they can do but may not know about (the workers are usually min. wage people)? Ironically, they can scan the negative and produce a very nice 8"x10" print, but they can't get the data to CD. Minilabs are not designed to produce scans for customers. The somewhat low res stuff they do produce is meant for people's monitors. I've asked for higher res scans of med format film and they were not able to do it (Fuji Frontier and Noritsu). What to do? You could go to a service bureau where the prices are quite high (here, about $20 - $25 for a single image from med format). Or get yourself a film scanner. There are a lot of used (and new) film scanners out there. Just don't be impressed by claims of high resolution. Round about 4000 - 5000 dpi is the limit for non-drum scanners. At that, the image quality on the film is not often up to more than about 2500 dpi or so. Make sure the scanner has "ICE" capability to deal with dirt and scratches. Used (and maybe new): Minolta 5600 (not the Mark II version) Nikon V, 5000. Some Canon's (older ones, probably lower resolution) had power supply noise issues that introduced banding into the scan. Before committing to a Canon film scanner check out the history on the scanner NG. Some flatbeds like the higher end Epson's are also quite capable, and can be used for most any sized negative or positive and documents as well. -- gmail originated posts filtered due to spam. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Minilab negative scanning resolution
On 12/18/2010 9:01 PM, dave wrote:
When I have film processed I get just the CD - no prints (usually). Recently I took some negatives to the processor (using Kodak equipment) and asked them to do a high resolution scan and put the results on CD. All they can do is standard scan - about 1 MB jpg file. This is fine for a 4"x6" print, ok for a 5"x7" print, but not good enough for a 8"x10" print. Is this true of all minilab equipment, or is there something they can do but may not know about (the workers are usually min. wage people)? Ironically, they can scan the negative and produce a very nice 8"x10" print, but they can't get the data to CD. I know that there are places I can get scanning done, but that means mailing negatives, more time, more money, etc. Thanks, Dave I have had decent results by talking to the employee, asking for a higher res scan. Of course I gave them a proper incentive. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scanning Color Negative Film -- Nikon Coolscan, Mac | Richard Karash | Digital Photography | 11 | July 31st 08 05:52 PM |
negative scanning | ANDREW CROSS | Digital Photography | 7 | April 28th 05 12:35 AM |
Scanning Negative Archive | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 12 | January 27th 05 12:42 AM |
Scanning resolution, printing resolution, and downsampling | hassy_user | Digital Photography | 22 | October 27th 04 08:18 PM |
Negative Holder for scanning | ice | Digital Photography | 5 | October 21st 04 04:59 PM |