|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 29th 05, 03:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Brit mag rates E-1 and 1DsMk 2 as best cameras
Amateur Photographer rated them according to various
things, but what it came down to was image quality with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc, also came into play. -Rich "Bittorrents are REFUNDS for all the BAD movie products Hollywood never gave us refunds for in the past" 
|
|
#2
August 29th 05, 09:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"RichA" wrote in message ... Amateur Photographer rated them according to various things, but what it came down to was image quality with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc, also came into play. -Rich ....and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005 rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy. 350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3 (lowest)
|
|
#3
August 29th 05, 12:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"dylan" wrote in message ... "RichA" wrote in message ... Amateur Photographer rated them according to various things, but what it came down to was image quality with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc, also came into play. -Rich ...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005 rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy. 350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3 (lowest) Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there you go.
|
|
#4
August 29th 05, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pete D" wrote in message ... "dylan" wrote in message ... "RichA" wrote in message ... Amateur Photographer rated them according to various things, but what it came down to was image quality with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc, also came into play. -Rich ...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005 rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy. 350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3 (lowest) Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there you go. They did comment in the 'Cons' column :- " Small size can prove uncomfortable for users with large hands ". Perhaps thats why it didn't get Best Buy.
|
|
#5
August 30th 05, 07:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"dylan" wrote in message ... "Pete D" wrote in message ... "dylan" wrote in message ... "RichA" wrote in message ... Amateur Photographer rated them according to various things, but what it came down to was image quality with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc, also came into play. -Rich ...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005 rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy. 350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3 (lowest) Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there you go. They did comment in the 'Cons' column :- " Small size can prove uncomfortable for users with large hands ". Perhaps thats why it didn't get Best Buy. I think they are uncomfortable for people with "standard" hands, seriously what were Canon thinking?.
|
|
#6
August 31st 05, 12:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 06:52:55 GMT, "Pete D" wrote:
I think they are uncomfortable for people with "standard" hands, seriously what were Canon thinking?. I buy gloves in 'large' size and used Olympus OM SLRs for over twenty years.The 350D is almost identical in height so to me it doesn't feel small. It's all down to what you're used to. Al -- [This space intentionally left blank]
|
|
#7
August 29th 05, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Size of the camera in this case would be a qualitative judgement, not
quantitative. Quality of the pics don't suffer, its just personal preference... /like my 350D and its size, and I'm 6'1, 200lbs.
|
|
#8
August 30th 05, 07:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... Size of the camera in this case would be a qualitative judgement, not quantitative. Quality of the pics don't suffer, its just personal preference... /like my 350D and its size, and I'm 6'1, 200lbs. Just think how happy you would be with a decent sized hand grip.
|
|
#9
August 30th 05, 10:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#10
August 29th 05, 06:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:02:04 GMT, "Pete D" wrote:
"dylan" wrote in message ... "RichA" wrote in message ... what it came down to was image quality with the 1DsMk2 and E-1 coming closest to good film compared to the other 10 DSLRs on test. Egonomics, etc, also came into play. ...and British magazine Practical Photography Film & Digital Sept 2005 rated Canon 20D Testers choice, Nikon D50 best buy. 350D, 20D & 1DSMkII got 5 stars whilst E-300, *ist DL & SD10 got 3 (lowest) Which is really strange because if I was rating them I would drop the 350D off alltogether because I think the ergonomics suck big time, but there you go. This only goes to prove that the only accurate review is the one done by the intended buyer/user. But then we already knew that..... ;-) Al -- [This space intentionally left blank]
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
