View Camera's Online Gallery

View Camera magazine is creating a space on our web site for images from
largeformat photographers. Here are the rules

-anyone can submit an image. The camera must be 6x9 or larger. In the image
area you must include the edges of the film. If you want the image cropped
indicate so on the image
-files must be smaller than 125K and should be in .jpg format
-anything deemed pornographic will be deleted
-you can include up to 50 words of info - location, camera, lens, film type,
exposure, filters, etc.
-if you want direct feedback include your e-mail address
-any antagonistic comments will be deleted and a second offense here will
result in the elimination of all of your images and your opportunity to post
anything else on the site

send images after March 8 to

steve simmons

In article ,
(Largformat) wrote:

View Camera magazine is creating a space on our web site for images from
largeformat photographers. Here are the rules

-anyone can submit an image. The camera must be 6x9 or larger. In the image
area you must include the edges of the film. If you want the image cropped
indicate so on the image
-files must be smaller than 125K and should be in .jpg format
-anything deemed pornographic will be deleted
-you can include up to 50 words of info - location, camera, lens, film type,
exposure, filters, etc.
-if you want direct feedback include your e-mail address
-any antagonistic comments will be deleted and a second offense here will
result in the elimination of all of your images and your opportunity to post
anything else on the site

send images after March 8 to

steve simmons

Very Cool !

Gee; though I wonder how long the usual group of
naysayers will take to appear.

Thanks.
Gb
--
LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank

In article ,
(Largformat) wrote:

-files must be smaller than 125K and should be in .jpg format

How very odd. LARGE FORMAT camera limits sizes to an utterly stupidly low
limit. Explain, please. What's it all about? How you you rationalize it?
Enlighten me or be ready for the wrath.

In article , Gregory W Blank
wrote:

Very Cool !

Intersting how quickly you jump to kiss ass before looking at the reality.

from John Stafford

How very odd. LARGE FORMAT camera limits sizes to an utterly stupidly low
limit. Explain, please. What's it all about? How you you rationalize it?
Enlighten me or be ready for the wrath.

How predictable. I have been waiting for your negativity to show up again.
Nothing good comes from you .Just hostility.

So, here is why

-the images are being sent e-mail
-they are appearing on a web site where the max useable resolution is 72dpi
-some people become concerned about things being lifted from web sites so a
small file size makes using anything lifted more difficult to use

OK John, go for it. Show your hostility once again. It is soooooo predictable.
You can't even see the glass being half empty. You can't even find the glass.

steve simmons

PS I've gotten about 100 e-mail notes thanking me for the idea and the effort.
Some have suggestions and we may make some changes based on these suggestions.
We always appreciate constructive criticism.

In article ,
(Largformat) wrote:

from John Stafford

How very odd. LARGE FORMAT camera limits sizes to an utterly stupidly low
limit. Explain, please. What's it all about? How you you rationalize it?
Enlighten me or be ready for the wrath.

How predictable. I have been waiting for your negativity to show up again.
Nothing good comes from you .Just hostility.

Largely because in this group, nothing you post is good.

So, here is why

-the images are being sent e-mail

No excuse.

-they are appearing on a web site where the max useable resolution is 72dpi

125K at 72dpi is pathetic.

-some people become concerned about things being lifted from web sites so a
small file size makes using anything lifted more difficult to use

That's downright foolish.

Subject: View Camera's Online Gallery
From: (jjs)
Date: 3/3/2004 6:06 PM Mountain Standard Time
Message-id:

In article ,
(Largformat) wrote:

from John Stafford

How very odd. LARGE FORMAT camera limits sizes to an utterly stupidly low
limit. Explain, please. What's it all about? How you you rationalize it?
Enlighten me or be ready for the
wrath.

How predictable. I have been waiting for your negativity to show up again.
Nothing good comes from you .Just hostility.

Largely because in this group, nothing you post is good.

So, here is why

-the images are being sent e-mail

No excuse.

-they are appearing on a web site where the max useable resolution is 72dpi

125K at 72dpi is pathetic.

-some people become concerned about things being lifted from web sites so a
small file size makes using anything lifted more difficult to use

That's downright foolish.


Lets see. Lots of people think this is a good idea and will participate.

If you don't like it why not just refuse to take part?

Or, why not make a constructive suggestion? I dare you! Can you do it???

steve simmons

In article ,
(jjs) wrote:

In article , Gregory W Blank
wrote:

Very Cool !

Intersting how quickly you jump to kiss ass before looking at the reality.


LOL

Hey John; if I wanted to kiss assss it would be yours as your
a much bigger target.

Its about as interesting as what a fricking imbecile you always
turnout to be.

Grow up and get a life and learn type, then again,... I guess it could be
that brain hemorrhoid of yours, that limits your judgement :-D
--
LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank

In article ,
(Largformat) wrote:

If you don't like it why not just refuse to take part?

Wouldn't it be funny if you learned that you published my work and didn't
know it. Ah, the 'web'. How fun.

Or, why not make a constructive suggestion? I dare you! Can you do it???

You make no constructive suggestions here. You always point to your web
site to sell something. I've read no words from you concerning direct
questions.

In article , Gregory W Blank
wrote:

Hey John; if I wanted to kiss assss it would be yours as your
a much bigger target.

You clearly have never seen me. I'm the picture of fitness.

Its about as interesting as what a fricking imbecile you always
turnout to be.

Perhpaps it is time to re-post all the venom you posted against Steve
under your pseudonym. Selective memory, Greg?