If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak DX6340 jpg size very small at max res.
Just a query for anyone with one of these 4MP cameras. The image size at max resolution is below 1MB. This has me a little puzzled as my 5MP Canon produces files typically over 2MB. I am wondering if Kodak's jpg image compression is more severe than most. Leading me into the question of to what detriment to picture quality. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Tony |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tony,
I have the same camera and with the resolution set to maximum (which is 3.2MP, not 4) I have noticed that file size varies. Some pics are less than 1MB, but some are larger than 1MB. I haven't figured out why this is yet. Quality seems the same. I have to look into this. I wonder, would pics taken vertically be different than horizontals in terms of file size? Mike "aussieworker" wrote in message ... Just a query for anyone with one of these 4MP cameras. The image size at max resolution is below 1MB. This has me a little puzzled as my 5MP Canon produces files typically over 2MB. I am wondering if Kodak's jpg image compression is more severe than most. Leading me into the question of to what detriment to picture quality. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Tony |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
aussieworker wrote:
Just a query for anyone with one of these 4MP cameras. The image size at max resolution is below 1MB. This has me a little puzzled as my 5MP Canon produces files typically over 2MB. I am wondering if Kodak's jpg image compression is more severe than most. Leading me into the question of to what detriment to picture quality. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Tony I have the 4MP DX6490. Kodak uses "very clever" jpeg compression algorithm which usually results in 500k file sizes. Occasionally I get 1.5MB files when there isn't much sky or grass. IMHO they overcompress sky, grass, and even skin tones if you're doing a close-up portrait. If you take a landscape with a lot of detail the compression is much less. -- -- Ben Thomas - Software Engineer - Melbourne, Australia My Digital World: Kodak DX6490, Canon i9950, Pioneer A05; Hitachi 37" HD plasma display, DGTEC 2000A, Denon 2800, H/K AVR4500, Whatmough Encore; Sony Ericsson K700i, Palm Tungsten T. Disclaimer: Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my employer shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have the same camera and with the resolution set to maximum (which is 3.2MP, not 4) I have noticed that file size varies. Some pics are less than 1MB, but some are larger than 1MB. I haven't figured out why this is yet. The amount of light and color increase the file size. When I take an astro picture with my telescope the file size is very small. Example a moon picture is under 200k and Saturn is about 50k. Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Small size, optical zoom, VGA with sound - camera recommendation wanted | Stu | Digital Photography | 2 | October 8th 04 09:33 PM |
Kodak Gold 100 vs Kodak Bright Sun vs Kodak High Definition Colour Film | Graham Fountain | 35mm Photo Equipment | 9 | October 5th 04 12:57 AM |
Is the Kodak DX7630 a decent camera? | Don R | Digital Photography | 0 | July 21st 04 03:08 AM |
Which is better - Sony P-100 or Kodak DX-7440 ? | NYC | Digital Photography | 7 | July 12th 04 01:15 AM |
Add Kodak Brown to KRST? | Mike | In The Darkroom | 12 | May 5th 04 09:33 AM |