The Files that Adobe Can't Handle

Adobe can't handle Canons Dual Pixel RAW, At least not yet:

http://www.cameraegg.org/adobe-doesn...dual-pixel-raw
/
--
teleportation kills

In article , android wrote:

Adobe can't handle Canons Dual Pixel RAW, At least not yet:

http://www.cameraegg.org/adobe-doesn...dual-pixel-raw

Dual pixel RAW is an idiotic idea to begin with. That said, third party
software can't handle any new camera raw until they ship out support for it.

And when they support DPR, they're probably only going to support them enough
to open them, not actually use the DPR data in any capacity. Which is fine, DPR
sucks anyway.

--
Sandman

In article ,
Sandman wrote:


Adobe can't handle Canons Dual Pixel RAW, At least not yet:

http://www.cameraegg.org/adobe-doesn...dual-pixel-raw

Dual pixel RAW is an idiotic idea to begin with.

it's a clever idea that has potential.

at least they're not calling it a 60mp camera, like sigma would have.

That said, third party
software can't handle any new camera raw until they ship out support for it.

obviously.

And when they support DPR, they're probably only going to support them enough
to open them, not actually use the DPR data in any capacity. Which is fine, DPR
sucks anyway.

they'll support it as much as possible. no reason not to.

In article ,
nospam wrote:

In article ,
Sandman wrote:


Adobe can't handle Canons Dual Pixel RAW, At least not yet:

http://www.cameraegg.org/adobe-doesn...dual-pixel-raw

Dual pixel RAW is an idiotic idea to begin with.

it's a clever idea that has potential.

It has the potential to create new headroom for highlights and such in
conjunction with the new analog to digital on chip converters.

at least they're not calling it a 60mp camera, like sigma would have.

That said, third party
software can't handle any new camera raw until they ship out support for
it.

obviously.

Way too hard for Adobe even if the tech weren't IP protected, right?

And when they support DPR, they're probably only going to support them
enough
to open them, not actually use the DPR data in any capacity. Which is fine,
DPR
sucks anyway.

they'll support it as much as possible. no reason not to.
--
teleportation kills

In article , android
wrote:

at least they're not calling it a 60mp camera, like sigma would have.

That said, third party
software can't handle any new camera raw until they ship out support for
it.

obviously.

Way too hard for Adobe even if the tech weren't IP protected, right?

the obstacles are often legal, not technical.

In article ,
nospam wrote:

In article , android
wrote:

at least they're not calling it a 60mp camera, like sigma would have.

That said, third party
software can't handle any new camera raw until they ship out support
for
it.

obviously.

Way too hard for Adobe even if the tech weren't IP protected, right?

the obstacles are often legal, not technical.

an insider remark, i presume...
--
teleportation kills

In article , android
wrote:

That said, third party
software can't handle any new camera raw until they ship out support
for
it.

obviously.

Way too hard for Adobe even if the tech weren't IP protected, right?

the obstacles are often legal, not technical.

an insider remark, i presume...

you presume wrong.