Ruffling feathers

In article 2017062122133487638-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2017-06-22 04:37:59 +0000, android said:

In article ,
Ron C wrote:

On 6/20/2017 6:37 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-06-20 22:25:09 +0000, PeterN said:

On 6/19/2017 11:49 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
There are two ways to ruffle feathers in this group:

1. Say that Apple products are over-priced, or,

2. Present an image post-processed a little differently:

https://photos.smugmug.com/Current/i.../2017-06-19-39.
jp
g



Not all that different. "fire at will."

Which one is Will?

It's an expression.
You've never heard of that?

He thought the he was responding to nospam...

Actually I was responding to PeterN.

Yes. You were, but was you aware of that? I don't think so...
--
teleportation kills

On 2017-06-22 13:49:28 +0000, android said:

In article 2017062122133487638-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2017-06-22 04:37:59 +0000, android said:

In article ,
Ron C wrote:

On 6/20/2017 6:37 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-06-20 22:25:09 +0000, PeterN said:

On 6/19/2017 11:49 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
There are two ways to ruffle feathers in this group:

1. Say that Apple products are over-priced, or,

2. Present an image post-processed a little differently:

https://photos.smugmug.com/Current/i.../2017-06-19-39.
jp
g



Not all that different. "fire at will."

Which one is Will?

It's an expression.
You've never heard of that?

He thought the he was responding to nospam...

Actually I was responding to PeterN.

Yes. You where, but was you aware of that? I don't think so...

In that case your thinking would be wrong.
--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2017-06-22 13:53:36 +0000, android said:

In article 2017062122133487638-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2017-06-22 04:37:59 +0000, android said:

In article ,
Ron C wrote:

On 6/20/2017 6:37 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-06-20 22:25:09 +0000, PeterN said:

On 6/19/2017 11:49 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
There are two ways to ruffle feathers in this group:

1. Say that Apple products are over-priced, or,

2. Present an image post-processed a little differently:

https://photos.smugmug.com/Current/i.../2017-06-19-39.
jp
g



Not all that different. "fire at will."

Which one is Will?

It's an expression.
You've never heard of that?

He thought the he was responding to nospam...

Actually I was responding to PeterN.

Yes. You were, but was you aware of that? I don't think so...

Even with your spelling correction your thinking is still wrong.
--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article 2017062207084739997-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2017-06-22 13:49:28 +0000, android said:

In article 2017062122133487638-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2017-06-22 04:37:59 +0000, android said:

In article ,
Ron C wrote:

On 6/20/2017 6:37 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-06-20 22:25:09 +0000, PeterN said:

On 6/19/2017 11:49 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
There are two ways to ruffle feathers in this group:

1. Say that Apple products are over-priced, or,

2. Present an image post-processed a little differently:

https://photos.smugmug.com/Current/i...O/2017-06-19-3
9.
jp
g



Not all that different. "fire at will."

Which one is Will?

It's an expression.
You've never heard of that?

He thought the he was responding to nospam...

Actually I was responding to PeterN.

Yes. You where, but was you aware of that? I don't think so...

In that case your thinking would be wrong.

The lady protests...
--
teleportation kills

In article 2017062207112454849-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2017-06-22 13:53:36 +0000, android said:

In article 2017062122133487638-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2017-06-22 04:37:59 +0000, android said:

In article ,
Ron C wrote:

On 6/20/2017 6:37 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-06-20 22:25:09 +0000, PeterN said:

On 6/19/2017 11:49 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
There are two ways to ruffle feathers in this group:

1. Say that Apple products are over-priced, or,

2. Present an image post-processed a little differently:

https://photos.smugmug.com/Current/i...O/2017-06-19-3
9.
jp
g



Not all that different. "fire at will."

Which one is Will?

It's an expression.
You've never heard of that?

He thought the he was responding to nospam...

Actually I was responding to PeterN.

Yes. You were, but was you aware of that? I don't think so...

Even with your spelling correction your thinking is still wrong.

The lady still protests to much...
--
teleportation kills

In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

On Thursday, 22 June 2017 05:05:03 UTC+1, Ron C wrote:
On 6/21/2017 10:51 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Jun 21, 2017, Ron C wrote
(in ):

On 6/20/2017 6:37 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-06-20 22:25:09 +0000, said:

On 6/19/2017 11:49 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
There are two ways to ruffle feathers in this group:

1. Say that Apple products are over-priced, or,

2. Present an image post-processed a little differently:

https://photos.smugmug.com/Current/i...O/2017-06-19-3
9.jp
g

Not all that different. "fire at will."

Which one is Will?
It's an expression.
You've never heard of that?

It was a joke.
You’ve never heard of those?

Announcer:
Take a closer look at GEICO.
Great savings and a whole lot more.

A spin on the same joke.

I believe it's an east cost ad thing.

Captain Sisko said "fire at will" when defending DS9 from the cardassians and
none of them were called Will, I had an uncle Will and tehy weren't firing at
him either.

The information retrieved after the battle was inconclusive. None of the
the bodies carried papers indicating that the bearer was a Will but OTOH
it could have been called that anyways or have had their documentation
destroyed in the battle. That special tattoo would have to have been
gone to then, of course or the body could have been lost into deep space
with ID and all.
We will never know...
--
teleportation kills