If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mike wrote:
Hi, I am looking into buying a polarizing filter to use on a Canon 10D. = ... You want a circular polarizer for a Canon 10D. ---Bob Gross--- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 02:18:43 +0100, "Mike"
wrote: Hi, I am looking into buying a polarizing filter to use on a Canon 10D. You need a circular one. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Polarizer advice
Mike wrote:
Hi, I am looking into buying a polarizing filter to use on a Canon 10D. I've been reading up about this aspect of photography on various websites and I came across one which mentions the difference between Linear and Circular polarizers. Here's what it says about Circular Polarizers: /CIRCULAR POLARIZER / /Provides the same filter effects as a Linear Polarizer, but is designed to work with auto focus cameras with beam splitting metering. The Circular Polarizer has linear polarizer construction plus a built-in "Wave Retardant" to ensure proper exposure. The linear element polarizes the light, and the wave retardant de-polarizes it, and then the beam-splitting meter polarizes the light again for proper exposure. The use of a Linear Polarizer with a beam-splitting meter will result in underexposure./ My question - does the 10D have "beam splitting metering?" I have never come across this phrase before and it looks like it would be a good idea for me to find out now rather than regret it when I buy the wrong kind of filter! Thanks. What all this means is that the light that reaches the auto-focus system has been directed there through a beam splitter: a partially silvered mirror, so some light passes through, and some light is reflected. A result is the light becomes partially linearly polarized. If you put 2 linear polarizers together and rotate them, the light becomes virtually 100% blocked (0% transmission) when the polarizers are at 90 degrees. Thus if you put a linear polarizer on these cameras, depending on the angle of the polarizer, it can affect autofocus, or light metering, or both. The circular polarizer is a linear polarizer plus a 1/4-wave plate which changes the phase of the linear polarization resulting in circular polarization, which will not be affected by the bean splitter in a way that will hurt camera operation. (I know that last part is technical, but that's the best I can do in a short paragraph). You can probably google search for circular polarizer technical details and get a clearer explanation. The bottom line is only use a circular polarizer on autofocus cameras. They cost more because of the added optical element, the 1/4-wave plate. Roger |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mike wrote:
Hi, I am looking into buying a polarizing filter to use on a Canon 10D. I've been reading up about this aspect of photography on various websites and I came across one which mentions the difference between Linear and Circular polarizers. Here's what it says about Circular Polarizers: /CIRCULAR POLARIZER / /Provides the same filter effects as a Linear Polarizer, but is designed to work with auto focus cameras with beam splitting metering. The Circular Polarizer has linear polarizer construction plus a built-in "Wave Retardant" to ensure proper exposure. The linear element polarizes the light, and the wave retardant de-polarizes it, and then the beam-splitting meter polarizes the light again for proper exposure. The use of a Linear Polarizer with a beam-splitting meter will result in underexposure./ My question - does the 10D have "beam splitting metering?" I have never come across this phrase before and it looks like it would be a good idea for me to find out now rather than regret it when I buy the wrong kind of filter! Thanks. What all this means is that the light that reaches the auto-focus system has been directed there through a beam splitter: a partially silvered mirror, so some light passes through, and some light is reflected. A result is the light becomes partially linearly polarized. If you put 2 linear polarizers together and rotate them, the light becomes virtually 100% blocked (0% transmission) when the polarizers are at 90 degrees. Thus if you put a linear polarizer on these cameras, depending on the angle of the polarizer, it can affect autofocus, or light metering, or both. The circular polarizer is a linear polarizer plus a 1/4-wave plate which changes the phase of the linear polarization resulting in circular polarization, which will not be affected by the bean splitter in a way that will hurt camera operation. (I know that last part is technical, but that's the best I can do in a short paragraph). You can probably google search for circular polarizer technical details and get a clearer explanation. The bottom line is only use a circular polarizer on autofocus cameras. They cost more because of the added optical element, the 1/4-wave plate. Roger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need recommendation - 67mm circular polarizer. | VJ | 35mm Photo Equipment | 4 | July 8th 04 03:23 PM |
Polarizer filter | Zsolt | Other Photographic Equipment | 25 | March 27th 04 12:49 AM |
Polarizer filter | Zsolt | General Photography Techniques | 3 | March 23rd 04 02:20 PM |
Polarizer filter | Zsolt | General Photography Techniques | 0 | March 21st 04 10:09 PM |