If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
D3200; time to lose the AA filters?
If you look at the D3200, the Sony NEX-7, the D800, you'll see that the
images from them at low ISO are soft. But, the D800E doesn't look soft, at least based on another comparison I saw. Compare the D7000 to the D3200. Look at the paperclips in the scene at 200 ISO. Notice how soft the D3200 and the Sony NEX-7 images are? Notice how sharp the D7000 image is by comparison? Same with the Olympus OM-D, it is sharp. Resolution is better on the 24mp cameras, but the images are not sharp-looking. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikond3200/6 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
D3200; time to lose the AA filters?
"Rich" wrote in message
... If you look at the D3200, the Sony NEX-7, the D800, you'll see that the images from them at low ISO are soft. But, the D800E doesn't look soft, at least based on another comparison I saw. Compare the D7000 to the D3200. Look at the paperclips in the scene at 200 ISO. Notice how soft the D3200 and the Sony NEX-7 images are? Notice how sharp the D7000 image is by comparison? Same with the Olympus OM-D, it is sharp. Resolution is better on the 24mp cameras, but the images are not sharp-looking. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikond3200/6 On the basis that the 36 MP D800 full-frame camera appears to be near to the resolution of many existing lenses - to a level where the AA filter isn't doing a lot, a 24 MP APS-C camera (particularly one which is designed more for use with lower end lenses) may also be at the point where the need for an AA filter is marginal. Do we know for sure that the D3200 /has/ an AA filter? David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
D3200; time to lose the AA filters?
"Rich" wrote in message
... If you look at the D3200, the Sony NEX-7, the D800, you'll see that the images from them at low ISO are soft. But, the D800E doesn't look soft, at least based on another comparison I saw. Compare the D7000 to the D3200. Look at the paperclips in the scene at 200 ISO. Notice how soft the D3200 and the Sony NEX-7 images are? Notice how sharp the D7000 image is by comparison? Same with the Olympus OM-D, it is sharp. Resolution is better on the 24mp cameras, but the images are not sharp-looking. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikond3200/6 I meant to add - for a fair comparison, should you not be looking at the images where the objects taken are are the same size, rather than at the different sizes shown in those comparisons? Oh, and taken with the same lens? I do see what you mean between the D3200 and NEX-7, though. David |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
D3200; time to lose the AA filters?
"RichA" wrote in message ... On Apr 28, 1:38 am, "David J Taylor" david- wrote: "Rich" wrote in message ... If you look at the D3200, the Sony NEX-7, the D800, you'll see that the images from them at low ISO are soft. But, the D800E doesn't look soft, at least based on another comparison I saw. Compare the D7000 to the D3200. Look at the paperclips in the scene at 200 ISO. Notice how soft the D3200 and the Sony NEX-7 images are? Notice how sharp the D7000 image is by comparison? Same with the Olympus OM-D, it is sharp. Resolution is better on the 24mp cameras, but the images are not sharp-looking. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikond3200/6 I meant to add - for a fair comparison, should you not be looking at the images where the objects taken are are the same size, rather than at the different sizes shown in those comparisons? Oh, and taken with the same lens? I do see what you mean between the D3200 and NEX-7, though. David Answering your other question, we don't know if the D3200 has an AA filter, but I presume it does, since not having one would apparently raise the cost (if the D800E is any guide, or maybe that's only because they are making few of them?) something you probably don't want to do with an entry-level camera. Ideally, you would want to use the same lens, but the images from the 16mp and 24mp cameras were both close enough so you can see (you have to look at a few areas in that scene, try the money) that the 24mp does have a resolution edge, but the images do not look sharp. As it is, the D800E is now the undisputed resolution benchmark in DSLRs and mirrorless cameras up to FF. I would like to add also the D3200 is noisy compared to the D7000 (check out the blue-green swatch or especially the reds of the Martini bottle at 800ISO or so, but cleaner than the NEX-7 in blue, and worse in red. The D3200 reds are very washed out, to the point of being orang. This holds true for RAW and Jpegs. Then again, since I'm getting much older and frailer, I might just say the hell with it all and get a Panasonic Lumix FZ150 and be done with it all as opposed to lugging around all the lenses and tripods etc....the price you pay... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
D3200; time to lose the AA filters?
In article
, RichA wrote: Answering your other question, we don't know if the D3200 has an AA filter, but I presume it does, it's virtually guaranteed to have one. since not having one would apparently raise the cost (if the D800E is any guide, or maybe that's only because they are making few of them?) leaving it out entirely would reduce the cost. what the d800e has is an antialias filter followed by an un-antialias filter, so that the optical length matches the d800 and the rest of the camera can remain the same. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
D3200; time to lose the AA filters?
On 2012-04-28 12:23:55 -0700, "Tim Conway" said:
"RichA" wrote in message ... On Apr 28, 1:38 am, "David J Taylor" david- wrote: "Rich" wrote in message ... If you look at the D3200, the Sony NEX-7, the D800, you'll see that the images from them at low ISO are soft. But, the D800E doesn't look soft, at least based on another comparison I saw. Compare the D7000 to the D3200. Look at the paperclips in the scene at 200 ISO. Notice how soft the D3200 and the Sony NEX-7 images are? Notice how sharp the D7000 image is by comparison? Same with the Olympus OM-D, it is sharp. Resolution is better on the 24mp cameras, but the images are not sharp-looking. http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikond3200/6 I meant to add - for a fair comparison, should you not be looking at the images where the objects taken are are the same size, rather than at the different sizes shown in those comparisons? Oh, and taken with the same lens? I do see what you mean between the D3200 and NEX-7, though. David Answering your other question, we don't know if the D3200 has an AA filter, but I presume it does, since not having one would apparently raise the cost (if the D800E is any guide, or maybe that's only because they are making few of them?) It seems the D3200 has what Nikon calls "an optical low pass" filter. So I guess it has an AA filter. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
D3200; time to lose the AA filters?
"Tim Conway" wrote in message
... [] Then again, since I'm getting much older and frailer, I might just say the hell with it all and get a Panasonic Lumix FZ150 and be done with it all as opposed to lugging around all the lenses and tripods etc....the price you pay... Some of the Panasonic super-zooms are quite good, I've used both their compact and larger-format variants. I do agree with you about "lugging around kit", which is why today I mostly use an 18-200 mm zoom with my compact Nikon DSLR, and get getter lens quality than the Panasonic, and the advantage of a high-ISO capability. No tripods, and no "etc." I've also been experimenting with the 5 Mpix camera in the iPad and find that it can produce reasonable images under good conditions, and acceptable images indoors. Cheers, David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
D3200; time to lose the AA filters?
In article
, RichA wrote: since not having one would apparently raise the cost (if the D800E is any guide, or maybe that's only because they are making few of them?) leaving it out entirely would reduce the cost. what the d800e has is an antialias filter followed by an un-antialias filter, so that the optical length matches the d800 and the rest of the camera can remain the same. Yes, I've read that, so if they decided to eliminate the effect of the AA filter, they would have to do the same with the D3200. no they wouldn't have to do the same. the only reason they do that is because there's two models, one with and one without an aa filter. if they're only making one model, they don't need to match anything else. just leave the aa filter out entirely. however, it's stupid to do that, especially on a low end camera. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
D3200; time to lose the AA filters? | Rich[_6_] | Digital Photography | 0 | April 28th 12 04:04 AM |
What Nikon has done with the D3200 | Douglas Johnson[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | April 20th 12 04:21 PM |
What Nikon has done with the D3200 | David Dyer-Bennet | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | April 20th 12 01:40 AM |
Time to dump moire filters? | Rich | Digital Photography | 1 | August 2nd 07 05:02 AM |
Newbie: Use of Contrast Filters and Exposure Time | KS | In The Darkroom | 12 | August 25th 04 02:44 PM |