If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Tinted glass
That's what i've been waiting for!
I have lenses and the knowledge waiting for this project: Digital large format camera... The fact that the CIS images obtained with these cheap CANON scanners are of low resolution is a none-issue for this proyect. What really bothers me if these scanners still work if the light source is taken away.. The fact that it is a B/W sensor is quite cool! This produces a very versatile B/W - COLOR scanner via multiple scans using any filter you like. This is perfect for IR- and alternative processes! I'll be hunting for a 600 DPI version of these Scanners. This should produce 30 MPIX images! Anyone can help me with model names and numbers? Tadeuz Raphael Bustin wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 03:52:37 -0300, Tadeuz Jalocha wrote: Hello Marv, It is'nt as easy it initially sounds, you need to remove the lens and the mirrors of the scanner an need to focus directly on the surface of the CCD. That's because if you leave the lens of the scanner in the optical path, you'll get only an visible image when the tree elements (CCD - lens of scanner - LF-Lens ) are in one line. Think of a very strong hot spot. This produces a new problem. Because the CCD's are shorter than the papers (flatbed) width they scan, you'll get a strong anamorphic effect if you achive to proyect correctly the image in the CCD of the stripped down scanner. That's because the scanner sees an image that is strongly compressed in vertical-to-travelling direction but not compressed at all at travelling direction. The scanner logic needs to adjust the data to give you an image with correct proportions. Does anyone know, if the sensors of the cheapest Canon scanners (LIDE techonlogy) are as long as the papers are wide? If so, this would be a perfect candidate! I have been talking with Agfa, forget about their scanners for such a proyect, the CCD are way too short. The Canons use CIS (contact image sensor) technology, where the sensor is indeed as wide as the scan bed -- but relatively low resolution. There is no "optical" system to speak of - no lens, no mirrors. Illumination of the target is by red/green/blue LEDs that also run the width of the target. Amazingly this is cheaper to build than the typical CCD scan bar. The sensor itself is monochrome; color is obtained by illuminating the target successively with the red/green/blue LEDs (as in the Nikon film scanners also.) The other type of scan head uses a CCD sensor that typically has only 30-40 mm optical width. In this kind of scan head there is an array of folded mirrors and a lens right in front of the CCD sensor. The CCD system yields much higher resolution, even though the sensor is much smaller. Illumination in this case is via cold cathode (fluorescent) embedded in the scan head. The sensor is "color" ie, there are three photosites per pixel, one each for red, green, and blue. CIS sensors are cheap, and allow for a very shallow scanner design. They are typically used in card readers, and fax machines. The majority of flatbed scanners use CCD scan heads. rafe b. http://www.terrapinphoto.com |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Tinted glass
Tadeuz:
You might check on Google for some of the other posted information. My search has turned up the slightly interesting idea that the CISs run "wide open" are essentially 600dpi devices and that upscaling the scan rate or down scaling it is really a multiple or fraction of that number. I will try throwing the CCD out the window tomorrow to see if I can make some sense of what the scanner is showing me. In addition, since most of these devices use TWAIN, get yourself a copy of the TWAIN Toolkit (free) at Twain.org. It allows you to drive the CCD without using a graphics program. Regards, Marv Tadeuz Jalocha wrote: That's what i've been waiting for! I have lenses and the knowledge waiting for this project: Digital large format camera... The fact that the CIS images obtained with these cheap CANON scanners are of low resolution is a none-issue for this proyect. What really bothers me if these scanners still work if the light source is taken away.. The fact that it is a B/W sensor is quite cool! This produces a very versatile B/W - COLOR scanner via multiple scans using any filter you like. This is perfect for IR- and alternative processes! I'll be hunting for a 600 DPI version of these Scanners. This should produce 30 MPIX images! Anyone can help me with model names and numbers? Tadeuz Raphael Bustin wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 03:52:37 -0300, Tadeuz Jalocha wrote: Hello Marv, It is'nt as easy it initially sounds, you need to remove the lens and the mirrors of the scanner an need to focus directly on the surface of the CCD. That's because if you leave the lens of the scanner in the optical path, you'll get only an visible image when the tree elements (CCD - lens of scanner - LF-Lens ) are in one line. Think of a very strong hot spot. This produces a new problem. Because the CCD's are shorter than the papers (flatbed) width they scan, you'll get a strong anamorphic effect if you achive to proyect correctly the image in the CCD of the stripped down scanner. That's because the scanner sees an image that is strongly compressed in vertical-to-travelling direction but not compressed at all at travelling direction. The scanner logic needs to adjust the data to give you an image with correct proportions. Does anyone know, if the sensors of the cheapest Canon scanners (LIDE techonlogy) are as long as the papers are wide? If so, this would be a perfect candidate! I have been talking with Agfa, forget about their scanners for such a proyect, the CCD are way too short. The Canons use CIS (contact image sensor) technology, where the sensor is indeed as wide as the scan bed -- but relatively low resolution. There is no "optical" system to speak of - no lens, no mirrors. Illumination of the target is by red/green/blue LEDs that also run the width of the target. Amazingly this is cheaper to build than the typical CCD scan bar. The sensor itself is monochrome; color is obtained by illuminating the target successively with the red/green/blue LEDs (as in the Nikon film scanners also.) The other type of scan head uses a CCD sensor that typically has only 30-40 mm optical width. In this kind of scan head there is an array of folded mirrors and a lens right in front of the CCD sensor. The CCD system yields much higher resolution, even though the sensor is much smaller. Illumination in this case is via cold cathode (fluorescent) embedded in the scan head. The sensor is "color" ie, there are three photosites per pixel, one each for red, green, and blue. CIS sensors are cheap, and allow for a very shallow scanner design. They are typically used in card readers, and fax machines. The majority of flatbed scanners use CCD scan heads. rafe b. http://www.terrapinphoto.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Heat absorbing glass or one-size-fits all glass carrier for 23CII negative popping problem | Phil Glaser | In The Darkroom | 2 | June 1st 04 01:47 PM |
Print stain from glass washing spray | Jerzy Łapiński | In The Darkroom | 7 | May 30th 04 04:44 PM |
Filter glass for Janpol enlarging lens? | Donald Qualls | In The Darkroom | 7 | May 29th 04 11:32 PM |
Flat Glass + Liquid Emulsion + A lotta heat | Some Dude | In The Darkroom | 3 | May 26th 04 03:56 AM |
Durst Glass Negative Carrier | Frank Calidonna | In The Darkroom | 1 | May 14th 04 06:05 AM |