|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
September 20th 04, 11:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Well said
If you can take decent photographs with a lens its a good lens. You can have the best lens in the world .. BUT if you have no idea how to use it then its the worst lens . lol blame the tools and get into the loop of buying more cameras and lens in the hope that your photographs might improve. So what? Does that make it a poor lens? (rhetorical questions, no answer sought or needed) 
|
|
#22
September 20th 04, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:41:19 -0700, DM wrote:
TP wrote in message . .. http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_06.htm Alas, it's yet another G lens. But it has VR, "Nano-Crystal" AR coating and a 'meniscus' protective glass element. Wow!?!?! Hm.. just about 5 years late compared to Canon's 300/2.8 IS? Hell, Canon folks can be so unforgiving. -- Dallas www.dallasdahms.com "Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded" - Sixto Rodriguez
|
|
#23
September 20th 04, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:41:19 -0700, DM wrote:
TP wrote in message . .. http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_06.htm Alas, it's yet another G lens. But it has VR, "Nano-Crystal" AR coating and a 'meniscus' protective glass element. Wow!?!?! Hm.. just about 5 years late compared to Canon's 300/2.8 IS? Hell, Canon folks can be so unforgiving. -- Dallas www.dallasdahms.com "Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded" - Sixto Rodriguez
|
|
#25
September 21st 04, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:58:35 +0800, Bruce Murphy wrote:
(DM) writes: TP wrote in message . .. http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_06.htm Alas, it's yet another G lens. But it has VR, "Nano-Crystal" AR coating and a 'meniscus' protective glass element. Wow!?!?! Hm.. just about 5 years late compared to Canon's 300/2.8 IS? Didn't nikon get their 70-200 VR out first? Doesn't really matter who was first, all that matters is whether the lens is good or not. -- Dallas www.dallasdahms.com "Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded" - Sixto Rodriguez
|
|
#26
September 21st 04, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:58:35 +0800, Bruce Murphy wrote:
(DM) writes: TP wrote in message . .. http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_06.htm Alas, it's yet another G lens. But it has VR, "Nano-Crystal" AR coating and a 'meniscus' protective glass element. Wow!?!?! Hm.. just about 5 years late compared to Canon's 300/2.8 IS? Didn't nikon get their 70-200 VR out first? Doesn't really matter who was first, all that matters is whether the lens is good or not. -- Dallas www.dallasdahms.com "Going down a dirty inner city side road I plotted Madness passed me by, she smiled hi, I nodded" - Sixto Rodriguez
|
|
#27
September 22nd 04, 02:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dallas writes:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:58:35 +0800, Bruce Murphy wrote: (DM) writes: TP wrote in message . .. http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_06.htm Alas, it's yet another G lens. But it has VR, "Nano-Crystal" AR coating and a 'meniscus' protective glass element. Wow!?!?! Hm.. just about 5 years late compared to Canon's 300/2.8 IS? Didn't nikon get their 70-200 VR out first? Doesn't really matter who was first, all that matters is whether the lens is good or not. Indeed, but just because something /matter/ doesn't really have any bearing on whether it's going to be discussed here. B
|
|
#28
September 22nd 04, 02:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dallas writes:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:58:35 +0800, Bruce Murphy wrote: (DM) writes: TP wrote in message . .. http://nikonimaging.com/global/news/2004/0916_06.htm Alas, it's yet another G lens. But it has VR, "Nano-Crystal" AR coating and a 'meniscus' protective glass element. Wow!?!?! Hm.. just about 5 years late compared to Canon's 300/2.8 IS? Didn't nikon get their 70-200 VR out first? Doesn't really matter who was first, all that matters is whether the lens is good or not. Indeed, but just because something /matter/ doesn't really have any bearing on whether it's going to be discussed here. B
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L vs Nikon 28-70mm f/2.8 AF-S | Dallas | 35mm Photo Equipment | 5 | July 28th 04 08:59 PM |
| Manual (or some help) for Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 lens | john | Digital Photography | 2 | July 12th 04 03:55 PM |
| Manual (or some help) for Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 lens | john | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | July 12th 04 06:03 AM |
Linear Mode
