If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
On Sat, 20 May 2017 11:06:47 +1200, Eric Stevens
wrote: I downloaded it once more and this time it works. Here is quick dash with Light Room. I used the dehaze filter and some fiddling with color temperature. https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kaynb57vi...-4603.jpg?dl=0 I understand that you just used dehaze and temperature adjustments, but the entire color balance seems out of whack to me. I also understand that you haven't visited Yosemite, and are not familiar with the character of the rock in the Sierra. The dehaze does a contrast push which emphasizes saturation. Then add, what to my eye is way too much warming, and it becomes unnatural and garish. When I said that is was a subdued, and overcast day I meant it. What about this one? I've touched nothing which directly affects the color. No dehaze. No saturation. Basically all that I affected was the luminance. https://www.dropbox.com/s/35bheu8pon...4603a.jpg?dl=0 And then for the fun of it I tried this one: https://www.dropbox.com/s/667qggx4dj...603PS.jpg?dl=0 I loaded it into Photoshop without any adjustments in ACR. The I created a duplicate layer and set the mode to overlay. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
On May 19, 2017, Ron C wrote
(in ): On 5/19/2017 7:21 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 23:06:47 +0000, Eric said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 22:21:45 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 04:55:46 +0000, Eric said: On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:43:07 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: On Wed, 17 May 2017 21:56:22 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-18 04:49:46 +0000, Bill said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 00:37:33 -0400, wrote: On 5/18/2017 12:07 AM, Bill W wrote: On Thu, 18 May 2017 15:55:30 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: There is more to it than that. The colors look slightly off and the lightin is peculiar. I have had a quick go at one of your shots with Photoshop although this required dabbling in unfamiliar territory. See https://www.dropbox.com/s/s6dbcdd34m...3-EES.jpg?dl=0 Now the sky is purple... Hmm. Talk about ambiguity. Song, or LGBT? Nah, I'm a boring person. It's neither, just an objective comment. I wish I could do better... Here is the RAF if you care to try. https://www.dropbox.com/s/pj7bmsr7vabc9dt/_DSF4603.raf For some reason none of my (up todate) Adobe CC software can open that file. :-( I downloaded it once more and this time it works. Here is quick dash with Light Room. I used the dehaze filter and some fiddling with color temperature. https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kaynb57vi...-4603.jpg?dl=0 I understand that you just used dehaze and temperature adjustments, but the entire color balance seems out of whack to me. I also understand that you haven't visited Yosemite, and are not familiar with the character of the rock in the Sierra. The dehaze does a contrast push which emphasizes saturation. Then add, what to my eye is way too much warming, and it becomes unnatural and garish. When I said that is was a subdued, and overcast day I meant it. What about this one? I've touched nothing which directly affects the color. No dehaze. No saturation. Basically all that I affected was the luminance. https://www.dropbox.com/s/35bheu8pon...4603a.jpg?dl=0 This is a rendition which to my eye works. As I said in another response to Peter, the haze/mist deep in the valley was an integral part of the scene that day and to try to fix all of the haze throws the entire image off balance. There is nothing with this rendition that appears to disturb the scene with regard to color balance, saturation, vibrance, or sharpening. I would say that if one would care to try for an "Adamsesque" B&W rendition, this version would be a pretty good starting point. I'm now wondering if a subdued color rendition could improve on a classic "Adamsesque" B&W rendition. [Um, no .. I'm not going to try.] Why not? All you need is the inclination, and the time. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
On Sat, 20 May 2017 11:47:05 +1200, Eric Stevens
wrote: On Sat, 20 May 2017 11:06:47 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: I downloaded it once more and this time it works. Here is quick dash with Light Room. I used the dehaze filter and some fiddling with color temperature. https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kaynb57vi...-4603.jpg?dl=0 I understand that you just used dehaze and temperature adjustments, but the entire color balance seems out of whack to me. I also understand that you haven't visited Yosemite, and are not familiar with the character of the rock in the Sierra. The dehaze does a contrast push which emphasizes saturation. Then add, what to my eye is way too much warming, and it becomes unnatural and garish. When I said that is was a subdued, and overcast day I meant it. What about this one? I've touched nothing which directly affects the color. No dehaze. No saturation. Basically all that I affected was the luminance. https://www.dropbox.com/s/35bheu8pon...4603a.jpg?dl=0 And then for the fun of it I tried this one: https://www.dropbox.com/s/667qggx4dj...603PS.jpg?dl=0 I loaded it into Photoshop without any adjustments in ACR. The I created a duplicate layer and set the mode to overlay. Looks much better than the other one. The sky still seems to have a purple tinge in that other one. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
On Fri, 19 May 2017 19:03:13 -0400, PeterN
wrote: On 5/19/2017 5:29 PM, Ron C wrote: On 5/19/2017 5:59 AM, PeterN wrote: On 5/18/2017 10:49 PM, Bill W wrote: On Thu, 18 May 2017 22:46:09 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 5/18/2017 10:35 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 02:26:04 +0000, PeterN said: On 5/18/2017 8:35 PM, Bill W wrote: snip Good to hear. I usually go for accuracy, but decided to just go with what I felt looked nice to my eye. I go for impression, rarely for accuracy. https://www.dropbox.com/s/t2quthg7matfxs8/Boron%20Botanical1filtered.jpg?dl=0 Your are, if nothing else, artistically predictable. ;-) My impression of a Chihuly. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r8w53i3y3m9cv8m/Dale%20Chihuly1.jpg?dl=0 That man belongs in art prison for fraud. You may not like it, but it is art. He has a major exhibit at the BBG. Darn, for a moment I thought this thread was going to drift in to the weird world of artistic impressions. I wouldn't want this hanging on my wall, yet I guess it is art. http://www.thefader.com/2017/05/18/jean-michel-basquiat-painting-sold-for-a-record-110-million This is not a comment on that particular piece, but let's face it, no matter what you come up with, somebody can find a way to call it art. Everything is art to someone, until there is an agreed upon rigid definition of art, which means everything is art forever. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
On May 19, 2017, Eric Stevens wrote
(in ): On Sat, 20 May 2017 11:06:47 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: I downloaded it once more and this time it works. Here is quick dash with Light Room. I used the dehaze filter and some fiddling with color temperature. https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kaynb57vi...-4603.jpg?dl=0 I understand that you just used dehaze and temperature adjustments, but the entire color balance seems out of whack to me. I also understand that you haven't visited Yosemite, and are not familiar with the character of the rock in the Sierra. The dehaze does a contrast push which emphasizes saturation. Then add, what to my eye is way too much warming, and it becomes unnatural and garish. When I said that is was a subdued, and overcast day I meant it. What about this one? I've touched nothing which directly affects the color. No dehaze. No saturation. Basically all that I affected was the luminance. https://www.dropbox.com/s/35bheu8pon...4603a.jpg?dl=0 And then for the fun of it I tried this one: https://www.dropbox.com/s/667qggx4dj...603PS.jpg?dl=0 I loaded it into Photoshop without any adjustments in ACR. The I created a duplicate layer and set the mode to overlay. Hmm... Interesting, though it gives it a somewhat washed out feel. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
On 5/19/2017 8:02 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On May 19, 2017, Ron C wrote (in ): On 5/19/2017 7:21 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 23:06:47 +0000, Eric said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 22:21:45 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 04:55:46 +0000, Eric said: On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:43:07 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: On Wed, 17 May 2017 21:56:22 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-18 04:49:46 +0000, Bill said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 00:37:33 -0400, wrote: On 5/18/2017 12:07 AM, Bill W wrote: On Thu, 18 May 2017 15:55:30 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: There is more to it than that. The colors look slightly off and the lightin is peculiar. I have had a quick go at one of your shots with Photoshop although this required dabbling in unfamiliar territory. See https://www.dropbox.com/s/s6dbcdd34m...3-EES.jpg?dl=0 Now the sky is purple... Hmm. Talk about ambiguity. Song, or LGBT? Nah, I'm a boring person. It's neither, just an objective comment. I wish I could do better... Here is the RAF if you care to try. https://www.dropbox.com/s/pj7bmsr7vabc9dt/_DSF4603.raf For some reason none of my (up todate) Adobe CC software can open that file. :-( I downloaded it once more and this time it works. Here is quick dash with Light Room. I used the dehaze filter and some fiddling with color temperature. https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kaynb57vi...-4603.jpg?dl=0 I understand that you just used dehaze and temperature adjustments, but the entire color balance seems out of whack to me. I also understand that you haven't visited Yosemite, and are not familiar with the character of the rock in the Sierra. The dehaze does a contrast push which emphasizes saturation. Then add, what to my eye is way too much warming, and it becomes unnatural and garish. When I said that is was a subdued, and overcast day I meant it. What about this one? I've touched nothing which directly affects the color. No dehaze. No saturation. Basically all that I affected was the luminance. https://www.dropbox.com/s/35bheu8pon...4603a.jpg?dl=0 This is a rendition which to my eye works. As I said in another response to Peter, the haze/mist deep in the valley was an integral part of the scene that day and to try to fix all of the haze throws the entire image off balance. There is nothing with this rendition that appears to disturb the scene with regard to color balance, saturation, vibrance, or sharpening. I would say that if one would care to try for an "Adamsesque" B&W rendition, this version would be a pretty good starting point. I'm now wondering if a subdued color rendition could improve on a classic "Adamsesque" B&W rendition. [Um, no .. I'm not going to try.] Why not? All you need is the inclination, and the time. Let's call that rhetorical. However, I might add that I've: [1] Never been to Yosemite [2] Haven't really seriously studied Adams [3] Don't really have the inclination (see [1]&[2] above) -- == Later... Ron C -- |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
On May 19, 2017, Ron C wrote
(in ): On 5/19/2017 8:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: On May 19, 2017, Ron C wrote (in ): On 5/19/2017 7:21 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 23:06:47 +0000, Eric said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 22:21:45 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 04:55:46 +0000, Eric said: On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:43:07 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: On Wed, 17 May 2017 21:56:22 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-18 04:49:46 +0000, Bill said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 00:37:33 -0400, wrote: On 5/18/2017 12:07 AM, Bill W wrote: On Thu, 18 May 2017 15:55:30 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: There is more to it than that. The colors look slightly off and the lightin is peculiar. I have had a quick go at one of your shots with Photoshop although this required dabbling in unfamiliar territory. See https://www.dropbox.com/s/s6dbcdd34m...3-EES.jpg?dl=0 Now the sky is purple... Hmm. Talk about ambiguity. Song, or LGBT? Nah, I'm a boring person. It's neither, just an objective comment. I wish I could do better... Here is the RAF if you care to try. https://www.dropbox.com/s/pj7bmsr7vabc9dt/_DSF4603.raf For some reason none of my (up todate) Adobe CC software can open that file. :-( I downloaded it once more and this time it works. Here is quick dash with Light Room. I used the dehaze filter and some fiddling with color temperature. https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kaynb57vi...-4603.jpg?dl=0 I understand that you just used dehaze and temperature adjustments, but the entire color balance seems out of whack to me. I also understand that you haven't visited Yosemite, and are not familiar with the character of the rock in the Sierra. The dehaze does a contrast push which emphasizes saturation. Then add, what to my eye is way too much warming, and it becomes unnatural and garish. When I said that is was a subdued, and overcast day I meant it. What about this one? I've touched nothing which directly affects the color. No dehaze. No saturation. Basically all that I affected was the luminance. https://www.dropbox.com/s/35bheu8pon...4603a.jpg?dl=0 This is a rendition which to my eye works. As I said in another response to Peter, the haze/mist deep in the valley was an integral part of the scene that day and to try to fix all of the haze throws the entire image off balance. There is nothing with this rendition that appears to disturb the scene with regard to color balance, saturation, vibrance, or sharpening. I would say that if one would care to try for an "Adamsesque" B&W rendition, this version would be a pretty good starting point. I'm now wondering if a subdued color rendition could improve on a classic "Adamsesque" B&W rendition. [Um, no .. I'm not going to try.] Why not? All you need is the inclination, and the time. Let's call that rhetorical. However, I might add that I've: [1] Never been to Yosemite [2] Haven't really seriously studied Adams [3] Don't really have the inclination (see [1]&[2] above) Fair enough. #3 is the controlling factor for now. With regard to #2, If you have any interest in one (or any) of our great photographic innovators consider several books; “Ansel Adams: The Camera”, “The Negative: Ansel Adams Photography”, “Examples; The Making of 40 photographs: Ansel Adams”, “Ansel Adams in The National Parks”, and “Ansel Adams in Color” all are available from Amazon, or via the Apple iBooks store. As to #1, if you have any sort of US travel bucket list I would highly recommend considering visits to a few of the Western National Parks such as Yosemite NP, Sequoia-Kings Canyon NP, Zion NP, North and South Rim of Grand Canyon NP, Death Valley NP. There are others, but try those for starters. https://www.nps.gov/findapark/index.htm I have another recommendation for any old farts over 62, who might be considering visiting National Parks anywhere in the US. Visit your closest NP as soon as possible and buy a *Senior Lifetime Pass*, it is currently a bargain at $10, but is soon going to be increased to $80. It has been the best $10 I have spent. Without that Senior lifetime pass, regular 7 day vehicle entry to the parks is $30, and an annual pass is $80. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
On 5/19/2017 8:57 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On May 19, 2017, Ron C wrote (in ): On 5/19/2017 8:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: On May 19, 2017, Ron C wrote (in ): On 5/19/2017 7:21 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 23:06:47 +0000, Eric said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 22:21:45 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 04:55:46 +0000, Eric said: On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:43:07 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: On Wed, 17 May 2017 21:56:22 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-18 04:49:46 +0000, Bill said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 00:37:33 -0400, wrote: On 5/18/2017 12:07 AM, Bill W wrote: On Thu, 18 May 2017 15:55:30 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: There is more to it than that. The colors look slightly off and the lightin is peculiar. I have had a quick go at one of your shots with Photoshop although this required dabbling in unfamiliar territory. See https://www.dropbox.com/s/s6dbcdd34m...3-EES.jpg?dl=0 Now the sky is purple... Hmm. Talk about ambiguity. Song, or LGBT? Nah, I'm a boring person. It's neither, just an objective comment. I wish I could do better... Here is the RAF if you care to try. https://www.dropbox.com/s/pj7bmsr7vabc9dt/_DSF4603.raf For some reason none of my (up todate) Adobe CC software can open that file. :-( I downloaded it once more and this time it works. Here is quick dash with Light Room. I used the dehaze filter and some fiddling with color temperature. https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kaynb57vi...-4603.jpg?dl=0 I understand that you just used dehaze and temperature adjustments, but the entire color balance seems out of whack to me. I also understand that you haven't visited Yosemite, and are not familiar with the character of the rock in the Sierra. The dehaze does a contrast push which emphasizes saturation. Then add, what to my eye is way too much warming, and it becomes unnatural and garish. When I said that is was a subdued, and overcast day I meant it. What about this one? I've touched nothing which directly affects the color. No dehaze. No saturation. Basically all that I affected was the luminance. https://www.dropbox.com/s/35bheu8pon...4603a.jpg?dl=0 This is a rendition which to my eye works. As I said in another response to Peter, the haze/mist deep in the valley was an integral part of the scene that day and to try to fix all of the haze throws the entire image off balance. There is nothing with this rendition that appears to disturb the scene with regard to color balance, saturation, vibrance, or sharpening. I would say that if one would care to try for an "Adamsesque" B&W rendition, this version would be a pretty good starting point. I'm now wondering if a subdued color rendition could improve on a classic "Adamsesque" B&W rendition. [Um, no .. I'm not going to try.] Why not? All you need is the inclination, and the time. Let's call that rhetorical. However, I might add that I've: [1] Never been to Yosemite [2] Haven't really seriously studied Adams [3] Don't really have the inclination (see [1]&[2] above) Fair enough. #3 is the controlling factor for now. With regard to #2, If you have any interest in one (or any) of our great photographic innovators consider several books; Ansel Adams: The Camera, The Negative: Ansel Adams Photography, Examples; The Making of 40 photographs: Ansel Adams, Ansel Adams in The National Parks, and Ansel Adams in Color all are available from Amazon, or via the Apple iBooks store. As to #1, if you have any sort of US travel bucket list I would highly recommend considering visits to a few of the Western National Parks such as Yosemite NP, Sequoia-Kings Canyon NP, Zion NP, North and South Rim of Grand Canyon NP, Death Valley NP. There are others, but try those for starters. https://www.nps.gov/findapark/index.htm I have another recommendation for any old farts over 62, who might be considering visiting National Parks anywhere in the US. Visit your closest NP as soon as possible and buy a *Senior Lifetime Pass*, it is currently a bargain at $10, but is soon going to be increased to $80. It has been the best $10 I have spent. Without that Senior lifetime pass, regular 7 day vehicle entry to the parks is $30, and an annual pass is $80. Thanks. Did not know about the *Senior Lifetime Pass* but not sure there's much value to the pass here in New Jersey. Also as to #1, I've never been big on travel. Though I have enjoyed the work related travels. [Usually sans camera. :-( ] Re #2, I tend to be more of a Peter Max than an Adams. I have absolute respect for Adam's work, but not my thing. -- == Later... Ron C -- |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
On May 19, 2017, Ron C wrote
(in ): On 5/19/2017 8:57 PM, Savageduck wrote: On May 19, 2017, Ron C wrote (in ): On 5/19/2017 8:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: On May 19, 2017, Ron C wrote (in ): On 5/19/2017 7:21 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 23:06:47 +0000, Eric said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 22:21:45 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-19 04:55:46 +0000, Eric said: On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:43:07 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: On Wed, 17 May 2017 21:56:22 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-18 04:49:46 +0000, Bill said: On Thu, 18 May 2017 00:37:33 -0400, wrote: On 5/18/2017 12:07 AM, Bill W wrote: On Thu, 18 May 2017 15:55:30 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: There is more to it than that. The colors look slightly off and the lightin is peculiar. I have had a quick go at one of your shots with Photoshop although this required dabbling in unfamiliar territory. See https://www.dropbox.com/s/s6dbcdd34m...3-EES.jpg?dl=0 Now the sky is purple... Hmm. Talk about ambiguity. Song, or LGBT? Nah, I'm a boring person. It's neither, just an objective comment. I wish I could do better... Here is the RAF if you care to try. https://www.dropbox.com/s/pj7bmsr7vabc9dt/_DSF4603.raf For some reason none of my (up todate) Adobe CC software can open that file. :-( I downloaded it once more and this time it works. Here is quick dash with Light Room. I used the dehaze filter and some fiddling with color temperature. https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kaynb57vi...-4603.jpg?dl=0 I understand that you just used dehaze and temperature adjustments, but the entire color balance seems out of whack to me. I also understand that you haven't visited Yosemite, and are not familiar with the character of the rock in the Sierra. The dehaze does a contrast push which emphasizes saturation. Then add, what to my eye is way too much warming, and it becomes unnatural and garish. When I said that is was a subdued, and overcast day I meant it. What about this one? I've touched nothing which directly affects the color. No dehaze. No saturation. Basically all that I affected was the luminance. https://www.dropbox.com/s/35bheu8pon...4603a.jpg?dl=0 This is a rendition which to my eye works. As I said in another response to Peter, the haze/mist deep in the valley was an integral part of the scene that day and to try to fix all of the haze throws the entire image off balance. There is nothing with this rendition that appears to disturb the scene with regard to color balance, saturation, vibrance, or sharpening. I would say that if one would care to try for an "Adamsesque" B&W rendition, this version would be a pretty good starting point. I'm now wondering if a subdued color rendition could improve on a classic "Adamsesque" B&W rendition. [Um, no .. I'm not going to try.] Why not? All you need is the inclination, and the time. Let's call that rhetorical. However, I might add that I've: [1] Never been to Yosemite [2] Haven't really seriously studied Adams [3] Don't really have the inclination (see [1]&[2] above) Fair enough. #3 is the controlling factor for now. With regard to #2, If you have any interest in one (or any) of our great photographic innovators consider several books; “Ansel Adams: The Camera”, “The Negative: Ansel Adams Photography”, “Examples; The Making of 40 photographs: Ansel Adams”, “Ansel Adams in The National Parks”, and “Ansel Adams in Color” all are available from Amazon, or via the Apple iBooks store. As to #1, if you have any sort of US travel bucket list I would highly recommend considering visits to a few of the Western National Parks such as Yosemite NP, Sequoia-Kings Canyon NP, Zion NP, North and South Rim of Grand Canyon NP, Death Valley NP. There are others, but try those for starters. https://www.nps.gov/findapark/index.htm I have another recommendation for any old farts over 62, who might be considering visiting National Parks anywhere in the US. Visit your closest NP as soon as possible and buy a *Senior Lifetime Pass*, it is currently a bargain at $10, but is soon going to be increased to $80. It has been the best $10 I have spent. Without that Senior lifetime pass, regular 7 day vehicle entry to the parks is $30, and an annual pass is $80. Thanks. Did not know about the *Senior Lifetime Pass* but not sure there's much value to the pass here in New Jersey. Is there a good reason to stick to NJ? I am sure that a little research should find someplace which might grab your interest. I don’t restrict myself to California, I look to most of the West in Oregon, Washington, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico as all fair game. If I head back East I have a few places I would like to visit, such as Acadia NP. Also as to #1, I've never been big on travel. Though I have enjoyed the work related travels. [Usually sans camera. :-( ] Of course the big part of work related travel is the light hit to the wallet. The choice is always yours, I just think there is so much to appreciate with what we have in this country, and it is sad to waste our good fortune by ignoring what is in our backyard. The question, if you are in reasonable health and are not otherwise occupied, is why not take a trip, any trip? What else is there to do? My next plan is to take the Coast Starlight for a train trip up to Seattle for a few days. Then of course there is the Rolex Monterey Motorsport Revival at Laguna Seca in August, but for me that is pretty much local. Re #2, I tend to be more of a Peter Max than an Adams. I have absolute respect for Adam's work, but not my thing. All well and good. However, there is no harm in a boardening of scope. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
X-T2 @ Yosemite Today SOOC
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: Also as to #1, I've never been big on travel. Though I have enjoyed the work related travels. [Usually sans camera. :-( ] Of course the big part of work related travel is the light hit to the wallet. true, but rarely any time for sightseeing. The choice is always yours, I just think there is so much to appreciate with what we have in this country, and it is sad to waste our good fortune by ignoring what is in our backyard. The question, if you are in reasonable health and are not otherwise occupied, is why not take a trip, any trip? What else is there to do? yep. My next plan is to take the Coast Starlight for a train trip up to Seattle for a few days. Then of course there is the Rolex Monterey Motorsport Revival at Laguna Seca in August, but for me that is pretty much local. at least you won't have to worry about bringing personal electronics on board a train. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For those Who Care to Play: Acros SOOC + RAF | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 113 | May 14th 17 02:51 PM |
SOOC pictures from Västerås city festival | Sandman | Digital Photography | 4 | July 5th 16 05:49 PM |
A SOOC JPEG vs RAW Comparison | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 3 | May 10th 16 07:54 PM |
Another SOOC JPEG | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 2 | April 23rd 16 03:48 AM |
Thoughts on SOOC | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 98 | March 11th 16 04:55 PM |