A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lensbaby Sponsored Selective Blur Photography Competition



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 21st 07, 09:06 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Wayne J. Cosshall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 826
Default Lensbaby Sponsored Selective Blur Photography Competition

LOLOL Hi Aaron, not sure I like the way you opened my quote but apart
from that, I agree.

Cheers,

Wayne

Wayne J. Cosshall
Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
Publisher, Experimental Digital Photography
http://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/



Aaron wrote:
And lo, Wayne J. Cosshall emerged from the ether
and spake thus:
It seems to me from what I am reading here, and it is obvious from prior
discussions, both here and elsewhere, is that there are two quite
fundamentally different approaches to photography:
1. do it in camera when you take the shot
2. do it afterwards to a 'clean' image

Which one we lean most towards impacts on our respond to gear like the
lensbaby. Some of the people posting would benefit from learning that
neither of these approaches is right or wrong, just different and that
they will suit different people or may suit you differently at different
times in your life.

Cheers,

Wayne


Let me add something else to that thought, Wayne. I generally agree,
but I also think that tightly zoomed pictures of flowers or your cat's
face are probably more aesthetically exciting through the eye of a
Lensbaby. If you take the photo "straight" with the best lens you have
and then manipulate it to death with software to get the effect, all
you've lost is time.

What's the point of having yet another crisply focused and completely
yawn-inspiring photograph of a yellow tulip or your pet iguana eating
up hard drive space? That's the question I pose to those who are
resistant to "creative" gobos and lenses, of which the Lensbaby 3G is
a very good example.

Putting some creative flavor between the sensor and a menagerie of
incredibly overdone and boring subjects can still create serious art.
It's not so much (for me) about saving money by using software instead
of a "gimmick" lens, it's about holding up the camera and seeing the
world in live-action selective focus; it can really give you ideas.

Here are a couple of things I've done with it.

"Remember, Remember the Fifth of November"
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3cpvl6

"Harkness and the Lensbaby"
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3d7z2n

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Infrared Photography Competition Wayne J. Cosshall Digital Photography 25 December 10th 06 07:38 AM
Infrared Photography Competition Wayne J. Cosshall Digital ZLR Cameras 24 December 10th 06 07:38 AM
Infrared Photography Competition Wayne J. Cosshall Photographing Nature 2 December 6th 06 04:03 AM
Selective file copy Bob Digital SLR Cameras 4 June 12th 06 06:12 AM
photography competition Jase Digital Photography 5 September 15th 04 09:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.